Kansas Crimson

Seahawk... tampons in the girls room is where tampons make sense lol

Ignorant rant tho seahawk. Your inserting a ridiculous amount of assumptions in there. The whole point was tampons are not needed in the MENS room.

No, the whole point is WHY DO YOU CARE SO MUCH ABOUT TAMPONS.

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 9:48 pm Seahawk... tampons in the girls room is where tampons make sense lol

And that is where they are

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:00 pm Ignorant rant tho seahawk. Your inserting a ridiculous amount of assumptions in there. The whole point was tampons are not needed in the MENS room.

Just keep revealing what an extreme misogynist you are--it's okay with me. And what an ignorant woman hater you are. The legislation indicates making menstrual products available to those who are menstruating. Not a group usually found in the boys bathroom. And indeed, the fact checkers and the journalists have not found menstrual products in boys bathrooms.

So your ignorant rant would seem of the "Look There's a Squirrel" variety, designed to move the discussion away from the "Bring Back Polio" sicko RFK Jr, who I saw on TV this week talking about his plan under a new Trump regime to get rid of vaccines in public schools. Also saw that there's a campaign to vaccinate children in Gaza, where polio has made a reappearance, so I guess it's better to lie and lie and lie about tampons in boys bathrooms than have to answer questions about the dead bear, deliberately drove wife to suicide weirdo who signed on with the golden escalator guy.

And if you want to talk about wasting money--the cost of tampons has gone up by 41% since 2019. Why aren't you as concerned about that instead of your fake assertions about boys bathrooms? Well, I think we can guess why.

They want a policy debate alright. Idiot MAGA morons.

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:00 pm Ignorant rant tho seahawk. Your inserting a ridiculous amount of assumptions in there. The whole point was tampons are not needed in the MENS room.

Speaking of ridiculous amount of assumptions, you really don't have any idea of how big of an idiot you are on the subject. Or are you just being an asshole on purpose? Either way, you suck! While kids are getting blown away in schools on an unfathomable level - you seem to be more concerned with your false assumptions about tampons being forced to be put in boys/mens rooms in schools in Minnesota and blaming Tim Walz for it.
Meanwhile, this morning there are multiple families making funeral arrangements and mourning the lives of their loved ones, and a lot more families comforting their loved ones because of the horror they witnessed. But hey, why the fuck should you care? They aren't your loved ones and there are more important things for you to be outraged about - such as there may be tampons in the boys/mens bathroom in some schools in Minnesota.

seahawk wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:00 pm

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:00 pm Ignorant rant tho seahawk. Your inserting a ridiculous amount of assumptions in there. The whole point was tampons are not needed in the MENS room.

Just keep revealing what an extreme misogynist you are--it's okay with me. And what an ignorant woman hater you are. The legislation indicates making menstrual products available to those who are menstruating. Not a group usually found in the boys bathroom. And indeed, the fact checkers and the journalists have not found menstrual products in boys bathrooms.

So your ignorant rant would seem of the "Look There's a Squirrel" variety, designed to move the discussion away from the "Bring Back Polio" sicko RFK Jr, who I saw on TV this week talking about his plan under a new Trump regime to get rid of vaccines in public schools. Also saw that there's a campaign to vaccinate children in Gaza, where polio has made a reappearance, so I guess it's better to lie and lie and lie about tampons in boys bathrooms than have to answer questions about the dead bear, deliberately drove wife to suicide weirdo who signed on with the golden escalator guy.

And if you want to talk about wasting money--the cost of tampons has gone up by 41% since 2019. Why aren't you as concerned about that instead of your fake assertions about boys bathrooms? Well, I think we can guess why.

And yet seahawk, you just went full "look there is a squirrel" with rfkj. Have you heard his own words on how he feels about vaccines? He isn't anti vaccine. Clearly you've heard propaganda. He's pro information. There is a lot of data and negative vaccine side effects out there that big pharma has swept under the rug for years. He's anti big pharma profiteering and using the system against the people. He also has made a point of bringing the discussion about our food system in general, and the poison they are feeding us in processed foods

Call me names if you want, doesn't matter. You don't know me. I'm not a hater of anyone, and making fun of the politics of putting tampons in a men's room does not equate to that

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 1:32 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:00 pm Ignorant rant tho seahawk. Your inserting a ridiculous amount of assumptions in there. The whole point was tampons are not needed in the MENS room.

Speaking of ridiculous amount of assumptions, you really don't have any idea of how big of an idiot you are on the subject. Or are you just being an asshole on purpose? Either way, you suck! While kids are getting blown away in schools on an unfathomable level - you seem to be more concerned with your false assumptions about tampons being forced to be put in boys/mens rooms in schools in Minnesota and blaming Tim Walz for it.
Meanwhile, this morning there are multiple families making funeral arrangements and mourning the lives of their loved ones, and a lot more families comforting their loved ones because of the horror they witnessed. But hey, why the fuck should you care? They aren't your loved ones and there are more important things for you to be outraged about - such as there may be tampons in the boys/mens bathroom in some schools in Minnesota.

Good thing the school resource officer was there to step in, or there would have been more. Should probably do more to protect ourselves, since we live in a deranged society these days

And BTW the tampon issue was just poking fun at walz. It's not a hill anyone should wanna die on. It's a silly political gesture, but in the grand scheme of things, some extra hygiene products floating around aren't changing much

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 6:19 am

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 1:32 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2024 10:00 pm Ignorant rant tho seahawk. Your inserting a ridiculous amount of assumptions in there. The whole point was tampons are not needed in the MENS room.

Speaking of ridiculous amount of assumptions, you really don't have any idea of how big of an idiot you are on the subject. Or are you just being an asshole on purpose? Either way, you suck! While kids are getting blown away in schools on an unfathomable level - you seem to be more concerned with your false assumptions about tampons being forced to be put in boys/mens rooms in schools in Minnesota and blaming Tim Walz for it.
Meanwhile, this morning there are multiple families making funeral arrangements and mourning the lives of their loved ones, and a lot more families comforting their loved ones because of the horror they witnessed. But hey, why the fuck should you care? They aren't your loved ones and there are more important things for you to be outraged about - such as there may be tampons in the boys/mens bathroom in some schools in Minnesota.

Good thing the school resource officer was there to step in, or there would have been more. Should probably do more to protect ourselves, since we live in a deranged society these days

And BTW the tampon issue was just poking fun at walz. It's not a hill anyone should wanna die on. It's a silly political gesture, but in the grand scheme of things, some extra hygiene products floating around aren't changing much

Yes, good thing the "resource officer was there to step in". Or you (and my guess is most others) ASSUME (probably rightfully so - but potentially not) "there would have been more".
STILL, 4 people are dead and more wounded. DESPITE a "resource officer" being there. I guess it wasn't really a deterrent and I 100% know it didn't prevent those 4 innocent people from being shot and killed and the others being injured. Let alone the psychological toll it will take on people who were there and witnessed it.

Yes, unfortunately, "should probably do more to protect ourselves". My question is - what exactly should we do?

Yes, "we we live in a deranged society these days" but then there are people such as yourself who are not at all deranged. .
For the 19,453rd time, I am going to say, of course we are not going to get rid of guns but..... A "deranged" person isn't going to shoot and injure and kill people if a "deranged" person doesn't have a gun.
So why the fuck would ANYONE have a problem with making it harder for a "deranged" person to get a gun? Of course we aren't going to stop all "deranged" people from being able to get guns but if one less "deranged" person has a gun then there is one less chance innocent people get shot and killed. That's a bad thing?

Getting to "the tampon issue". Go ahead and "poke fun" at Walz but it makes you come off as ignorant by doing as such.
1. "A hill to die on or not", there are many other "things I feel are wasteful and/or foolish. Not too sure why you choose tampons being made available to students (and faculty) to be something you are so passionate about. Is it possible it's the person more than the subject matter that you have an issue with?
2. I disagree that it's a silly political gesture but actually really don't have a problem with your feeling as such.
3. RIGHT!!!! "some extra hygiene products floating around aren't changing much". So if Walz and the State of Minnesota want them to be available to students who may need them, then why do you give a damn/darn about it as much as you do? Or at least did?
If you are upset that you feel taxpayer money is paying for them, then I ask - are you upset that tax payer money pays for other medical supplies in schools? What about tax payer money paying for water fountains in schools? Shouldn't/couldn't the kids bring water from home? What about tax payer money paying for etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.? Here is one, how much if any tax payer money is spent on "resource officers" who are not needed and how much is spent on those who are needed and who gets to ultimately decide where they are needed or not needed?

Quite a lot of noisy dying going on on this non-dying hill.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 7:50 am Quite a lot of noisy dying going on on this non-dying hill.

You libs need to quit bringing this up

Well someday you libs might get your way. Enough government propaganda will continue to convince enough people we need to further restrict guns or get rid of them all together. And when the shootings continue we will be even more defenseless as a population. Murder laws already exist. Most these school shooters go into these shooters as a suicide mention. I don't see them caring about gun laws. And there are other ways they can commit mass violence that don't involve guns

(Not to mention the tyranny and government overreach it will allow)

I do wish these acts of violent would stop, and I know you mean well. I just don't see how changing the rights of law abiding citizens is going to stop criminals that don't follow the laws anyway.

We live in a broken society, we need to address the root cause. Gun violence is a symptom, not a cause

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 8:22 am Well someday you libs might get your way. Enough government propaganda will continue to convince enough people we need to further restrict guns or get rid of them all together. And when the shootings continue we will be even more defenseless as a population. Murder laws already exist. Most these school shooters go into these shooters as a suicide mention. I don't see them caring about gun laws. And there are other ways they can commit mass violence that don't involve guns

(Not to mention the tyranny and government overreach it will allow)

If I were you, and got my “facts” where you get them, I might chill on references to “propaganda” for a bit.

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 8:22 am Well someday you libs might get your way. Enough government propaganda will continue to convince enough people we need to further restrict guns or get rid of them all together. And when the shootings continue we will be even more defenseless as a population. Murder laws already exist. Most these school shooters go into these shooters as a suicide mention. I don't see them caring about gun laws. And there are other ways they can commit mass violence that don't involve guns

(Not to mention the tyranny and government overreach it will allow)

Misson - not mention.
Of course they don't care about gun laws. But as I said, if a gun law made it tougher for one single school shooter to obtain a gun - why/how the fuck can anyone think that would be a bad thing?
Yes, there are other ways to commit mass violence. And? So you feel we shouldn't give a fuck about guns being in the hands of people who use them to shoot INNOCENT others because there are other ways they can commit mass violence?

PLUS.... It doesn't take "government propaganda" to convince ME we need to future restrict guns. I saw my best friend laying dead with bullet holes in his body. I had a family friend get "blown to pieces" at a fucking 4th of July parade (as well as someone else I know who had her achilles and ankle destroyed by a bullet/s), I have read about and seen on tv and in videos - people who have been shot and killed. EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY!
Dumbfucks believe more guns is the answer - or at least a solution.

good ‘ol randy…still ok with kids being murdered so he can be free to play gijoe

pos

ban books, but not guns

KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 9:28 am good ‘ol randy…still ok with kids being murdered so he can be free to play gijoe

pos

ban books, but not guns

I'm not for banning books, guns, or abortion

Hey! Get back to work! That fryer basket isn't going to load itself!