Page 8 of 60
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:46 pm
by Deleted User 62
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:01 pm
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:48 am
most popular dem in the country?
link?
Dumb, loud, and entitled.
Oh boy......
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:50 pm
by HouseDivided
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:46 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:01 pm
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:48 am
most popular dem in the country?
link?
Dumb, loud, and entitled.
Oh boy......
KFC?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:28 pm
by TDub
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:46 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 2:01 pm
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 11:48 am
most popular dem in the country?
link?
Dumb, loud, and entitled.
Oh boy......
Hes not wrong. If we're still talking about AOC.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:30 pm
by Deleted User 62
TDub wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:28 pm
Hes not wrong. If we're still talking about AOC.
I was thinking of Cheeto Mussolini
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:03 pm
by HouseDivided
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:30 pm
TDub wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:28 pm
Hes not wrong. If we're still talking about AOC.
I was thinking of Cheeto Mussolini
Unlike The Waitress, however, he has actually had a real job and made real money and accomplished real things in life. He's obnoxious and arrogant, sure, but he at least has some accomplishments to point to.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:40 pm
by Shirley
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:03 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:30 pm
TDub wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:28 pm
Hes not wrong. If we're still talking about AOC.
I was thinking of Cheeto Mussolini
Unlike The Waitress, however, he has actually had a real job and made real money and accomplished real things in life. He's obnoxious and arrogant, sure, but he at least has some accomplishments to point to.
How telling that you imagine labeling a representative to the United States congress,
"The Waitress", somehow, someway, reflects badly on her, because it's not
"a real job".
Working as a "waitress" is not a "real job"?
You are such a piece of shit, my heart goes out to you.
(Pro tip: It says more about you than it does about her.)
And, as someone who was too young to wait tables but worked busing them for years in Jr. High and High School, I'd likely be a little offended, if not for the source.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:58 pm
by TDub
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:30 pm
TDub wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:28 pm
Hes not wrong. If we're still talking about AOC.
I was thinking of Cheeto Mussolini
I know you were. But speaks to my earlier post about them having similarities.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:11 pm
by Deleted User 89
wonder what aoc might have done had she been born into the wealth and privilege little donnie was
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:17 pm
by HouseDivided
Feral wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:40 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 6:03 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 3:30 pm
I was thinking of Cheeto Mussolini
Unlike The Waitress, however, he has actually had a real job and made real money and accomplished real things in life. He's obnoxious and arrogant, sure, but he at least has some accomplishments to point to.
How telling that you imagine labeling a representative to the United States congress,
"The Waitress", somehow, someway, reflects badly on her, because it's not
"a real job".
Working as a "waitress" is not a "real job"?
You are such a piece of shit, my heart goes out to you.
(Pro tip: It says more about you than it does about her.)
And, as someone who was too young to wait tables but worked busing them for years in Jr. High and High School, I'd likely be a little offended, if not for the source.
I’m stunned by your response. Who’d a thunk it?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:57 pm
by DCHawk1
Everyone, everywhere should work in service at some point -- wait tables, tend bar, etc.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:09 pm
by HouseDivided
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:57 pm
Everyone, everywhere should work in service at some point -- wait tables, tend bar, etc.
Agreed, but you’d ideally have some substantive experience in something else before running for Congress. Jussayin.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:14 pm
by Geezer
Retail is another good one.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:15 pm
by Geezer
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:57 pm
Everyone, everywhere should work in service at some point -- wait tables, tend bar, etc.
Agreed, but you’d ideally have some substantive experience in something else before running for Congress. Jussayin.
Like born rich?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:24 pm
by HouseDivided
Geezer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:15 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:57 pm
Everyone, everywhere should work in service at some point -- wait tables, tend bar, etc.
Agreed, but you’d ideally have some substantive experience in something else before running for Congress. Jussayin.
Like born rich?
You bet. That’s the sum total of his work experience. Well-summarized.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:29 pm
by DCHawk1
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:57 pm
Everyone, everywhere should work in service at some point -- wait tables, tend bar, etc.
Agreed, but you’d ideally have some substantive experience in something else before running for Congress. Jussayin.
I dunno.
Citizen-legislators.
Fine by me.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:16 pm
by Geezer
We have Muslim citizens, Hindu, agnostic, rich, poor, middle class, all deserve representation.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2019 9:50 pm
by Deleted User 62
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:24 pm
Geezer wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:15 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:09 pm
Agreed, but you’d ideally have some substantive experience in something else before running for Congress. Jussayin.
Like born rich?
You bet. That’s the sum total of his work experience. Well-summarized.
Seems to be as many or more failure than success in Trumpland.
Oh well, when you are playing with bank money...who cares, right?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:43 am
by ousdahl
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:29 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:09 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 7:57 pm
Everyone, everywhere should work in service at some point -- wait tables, tend bar, etc.
Agreed, but you’d ideally have some substantive experience in something else before running for Congress. Jussayin.
I dunno.
Citizen-legislators.
Fine by me.
^^^^
when did psych become such an ivory tower elitist?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:35 am
by TDub
Especially considering one of the good things about trump is that he wasnt a career politician and was supposed to bring a different approach to politics to get us away from the institution of democratic monarchy with the Bush and clinton dynasties.
I'm fine with non politician leaders. But, I still think AOC is an awful example of that working, as is Trump.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:50 am
by ousdahl
While I’m sure plenty of detractors have plenty of substantive reasons to dislike AOC, why is it also so not surprising that modern conservatives would despise someone who is young, female, brown, and has one of those drug-dealing rapist names?
Oh, and who can forget that ShRiLL VoiCe!