Re: This Should Be Good.....
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 11:12 pm
Pistons come off exactly as they were.
Obviously meant to spark debate, but what about MJ's playoff performance while eating steak before games? MJ is way higher. MJ haters won't admit how much better he was in the playoffs after eating steak.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:12 am
Again, not saying LeBron is better....but it's closer than the LeBron haters will ever admit.
I'm not a LeBron "hater" and I don't see how anyone can't think it's "close".IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:12 am
Again, not saying LeBron is better....but it's closer than the LeBron haters will ever admit.
This was at the very end of Jordan's career. I think if Lebron retired at any point now, people would understand. If he retired in 2010 because he didn't like his coach, then sure it would be very odd. Jordan on his 3rd coach, and the Bulls were hanging around and staying together as long as they could, and were running out of steam. I think they would have won in 99 since the season was so short, but they wanted Phil to stay around and not to have to rebuild. They also publicly didn't like Krause for his organizations win championship comments, so they were either coming back all together or not at all. They barely got them all back together for the 98 team.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:56 am The last episode brings an interesting aspect of the debate when it comes to "GM LeBron". How would it be received if LeBron is out here publicly saying he won't play for that team anymore if a specific coach isn't coaching?
Nevermind Krause being an idiot and letting his ego get the best of him, that's not the point of discussion here. The point is, how would it be interpreted by MJ fans/LeBron haters if LeBron states he's not playing anymore unless Frank Vogel is the coach, then taking his ball and going home as soon as someone else is hired.
Good question! There indeed is a difference between saying you won't play for a team if a specific coach is NOT coaching and you won't play for a team if a specific coach IS coaching.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:56 am The last episode brings an interesting aspect of the debate when it comes to "GM LeBron". How would it be received if LeBron is out here publicly saying he won't play for that team anymore if a specific coach isn't coaching?
Nevermind Krause being an idiot and letting his ego get the best of him, that's not the point of discussion here. The point is, how would it be interpreted by MJ fans/LeBron haters if LeBron states he's not playing anymore unless Frank Vogel is the coach, then taking his ball and going home as soon as someone else is hired.
This very well could be true, but we both know, along with everyone else, that LeBron would be railroaded for eternity if he said the same things MJ said about that situation and conveniently hung it up when those things did happen.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:10 am I don’t think Jordan had any intention of playing in ‘99. Lockout, team break-up, etc. The Phil thing made it even easier and was a nice concise way of getting the media off of him.
MJ was on a one year deal. I may be misremembering, but I thought each of his last 2 contracts were one year deals.Grandma wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:19 amGood question! There indeed is a difference between saying you won't play for a team if a specific coach is NOT coaching and you won't play for a team if a specific coach IS coaching.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:56 am The last episode brings an interesting aspect of the debate when it comes to "GM LeBron". How would it be received if LeBron is out here publicly saying he won't play for that team anymore if a specific coach isn't coaching?
Nevermind Krause being an idiot and letting his ego get the best of him, that's not the point of discussion here. The point is, how would it be interpreted by MJ fans/LeBron haters if LeBron states he's not playing anymore unless Frank Vogel is the coach, then taking his ball and going home as soon as someone else is hired.
The thing people will rightfully bring up is Paul Silas, Brendan Malone, Mike Brown, Dave Blatt, and Luke Walton were Lebron "casualties".
Was MJ's contract up when Phil left? I believe it was. So he really didn't actually do specifically the exact scenario you are asking about.
I think his contract was up too. If it wasn't I doubt the media would always be asking about his plans for next year. It didn't play out EXACTLY like I mentioned, but it wasn't far off. He was heavily implying he would be back if Phil was. When they moved on from Phil, he walked away. He never really talked about the idea of retirement again, just that he wouldn't be back if Phil wasn't. That's as close to "quitting when you don't get your way" as it gets.Grandma wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:19 amGood question! There indeed is a difference between saying you won't play for a team if a specific coach is NOT coaching and you won't play for a team if a specific coach IS coaching.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:56 am The last episode brings an interesting aspect of the debate when it comes to "GM LeBron". How would it be received if LeBron is out here publicly saying he won't play for that team anymore if a specific coach isn't coaching?
Nevermind Krause being an idiot and letting his ego get the best of him, that's not the point of discussion here. The point is, how would it be interpreted by MJ fans/LeBron haters if LeBron states he's not playing anymore unless Frank Vogel is the coach, then taking his ball and going home as soon as someone else is hired.
The thing people will rightfully bring up is Paul Silas, Brendan Malone, Mike Brown, Dave Blatt, and Luke Walton were Lebron "casualties".
Was MJ's contract up when Phil left? I believe it was. So he really didn't actually do specifically the exact scenario you are asking about.
You are right. He got paid those last 2 years. It wasn't a forgone conclusion he was playing in 97-98 although it seemed likely they'd try to 3-Peat again.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:26 amMJ was on a one year deal. I may be misremembering, but I thought each of his last 2 contracts were one year deals.Grandma wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:19 amGood question! There indeed is a difference between saying you won't play for a team if a specific coach is NOT coaching and you won't play for a team if a specific coach IS coaching.NDballer13 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:56 am The last episode brings an interesting aspect of the debate when it comes to "GM LeBron". How would it be received if LeBron is out here publicly saying he won't play for that team anymore if a specific coach isn't coaching?
Nevermind Krause being an idiot and letting his ego get the best of him, that's not the point of discussion here. The point is, how would it be interpreted by MJ fans/LeBron haters if LeBron states he's not playing anymore unless Frank Vogel is the coach, then taking his ball and going home as soon as someone else is hired.
The thing people will rightfully bring up is Paul Silas, Brendan Malone, Mike Brown, Dave Blatt, and Luke Walton were Lebron "casualties".
Was MJ's contract up when Phil left? I believe it was. So he really didn't actually do specifically the exact scenario you are asking about.
It's a great article.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:06 am Lebron belongs on the other thread.
Good article on Kukoc. Always thought people forgot how good he was. Krause with another feather in the cap.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/2907 ... cago-bulls
A big takeaway I've had from the doc thus far is that I'm shocked he even came back for 97-98 given all of the stuff that was going on. It's no surprise he commanded an astronomical salary for the time.LVCHawk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:31 amYou are right. He got paid those last 2 years. It wasn't a forgone conclusion he was playing in 97-98 although it seemed likely they'd try to 3-Peat again.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:26 amMJ was on a one year deal. I may be misremembering, but I thought each of his last 2 contracts were one year deals.Grandma wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:19 am
Good question! There indeed is a difference between saying you won't play for a team if a specific coach is NOT coaching and you won't play for a team if a specific coach IS coaching.
The thing people will rightfully bring up is Paul Silas, Brendan Malone, Mike Brown, Dave Blatt, and Luke Walton were Lebron "casualties".
Was MJ's contract up when Phil left? I believe it was. So he really didn't actually do specifically the exact scenario you are asking about.
but haven't those things all happened?NDballer13 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:19 amThis very well could be true, but we both know, along with everyone else, that LeBron would be railroaded for eternity if he said the same things MJ said about that situation and conveniently hung it up when those things did happen.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Apr 27, 2020 9:10 am I don’t think Jordan had any intention of playing in ‘99. Lockout, team break-up, etc. The Phil thing made it even easier and was a nice concise way of getting the media off of him.