Page 8 of 79

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:18 pm
by Deleted User 307
https://www.npr.org/sections/coronaviru ... mal-record

With the 6.65 million new people filing for unemployment last week, have we reached that peak, or will there be even more numbers soon? That's 10 million people out of work in a two weeks. Employment report comes out tomorrow morning, but may not reflect everything.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:10 pm
by Deleted User 307
Geezer wrote: Fri Mar 20, 2020 1:56 pm https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Good source and constantly updated.
Officially over a million cases per this source.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:18 am
by Shirley



Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:33 am
by ousdahl
man, how is the service sector ever gonna fully recover?

between the pathogen concerns, and the increases in automation, dang.

on a related note, are cam girl revenues way up? I can only imagine, considering how many strippers are suddenly out of work, and how many patrons have nowhere else to see a naked chick dance around.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:43 am
by Deleted User 307
Feral wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:18 am
15% Unemployment is also very optimistic. I could see if going into the 20s easily.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:08 am
by Deleted User 307
Image

Seems like this thing hasn't hit Manhattan too hard, although people work in the city, and live in the outer boroughs

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:09 am
by jfish26
There is going to be a very, very stark distinction in outcomes on race/income lines.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:18 am
by DCHawk1
Vega wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:43 am
15% Unemployment is also very optimistic. I could see if going into the 20s easily.
Anything less than 30% is a victory.

Fucking brutal.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:03 pm
by PhDhawk
Yeah, 30% was what I saw in most projections, and that was based on last weeks numbers.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2020 4:47 pm
by Deleted User 307
Vega wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:24 pm God, those numbers are bad. So to use her numbers, .04% of folks died from H1N1. Meaning Covid-19 is 50x deadlier. Also, using her 7,500 deaths per day, that means that at the very least, 1% of deaths in the US are because of Covid-19 right now. And this thing is just starting.
About 1350 reported deaths yesterday of COVID in US. So about 18% of deaths using that 7,500 number. 18x increase in 8 days.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:14 pm
by TDub
Cuomo says on CNN today that deaths are declining. Hope hes right, NY on pace to have more of both cases and deaths today than yesterday. 630 deaths yesterday Already 594 new deaths today...its 1:15pm there

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:16 am
by Deleted User 307

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:40 am
by Shirley
Yikes:



Solid!



In other news, Wells Fargo also stopped opening accounts for people who didn't know they had them:


Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:04 am
by HouseDivided
[quote=Feral post_id=108064 time=1586187615 user_id=161]
Yikes:



Yay! Mission accomplished?!?

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:07 am
by Shirley
What's the over/under that Psych is relieved every time dolomite/Imzcount passes through, because at least, temporarily, he won't come across as the most whacko-brained conspiracy theorist here?

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:19 am
by DCHawk1
The idea that anyone would treat Yellen -- or Bernanke or Powell or, hell, even Greenspan -- as an honest observer or a voice of authority any longer simply amazes me.

And so now, for a report on the Great Chicago Fire, we go live to Mrs. O'Leary's Cow...

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:21 am
by Shirley

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:24 am
by Shirley
DCHawk1 wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:19 am The idea that anyone would treat Yellen -- or Bernanke or Powell or, hell, even Greenspan -- as an honest observer or a voice of authority any longer simply amazes me.

And so now, for a report on the Great Chicago Fire, we go live to Mrs. O'Leary's Cow...
Multiply that by 10, and you'll get some idea of how we've felt since shortly after republicans started forcing supply side economics down our throats, 4 decades ago.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:29 am
by DCHawk1
Oh.

Re: COVID-19 numbers

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:49 am
by HouseDivided
Feral wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:07 am What's the over/under that Psych is relieved every time dolomite/Imzcount passes through, because at least, temporarily, he won't come across as the most whacko-brained conspiracy theorist here?
You're the one who keeps celebrating every time a new wave of horrible financial news comes through. There's really not another rational explanation for that kind of behavior.