Page 8 of 19
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:59 pm
by jfish26
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:53 pm
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:04 pm
this is a really weird thread bringing out the worst in people.
i didn't realize there was a split down party lines as it relates to teenage girls being kidnapped and sold off to russia or china to work as sex slaves.
i would have figured this was a topic we could all agree on. i guess not.
We all know it's because the lefties are so desperate to avoid admitting that their people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking. Their precious intelligence agencies, the epsteins of the world, and people like the Clinton's, bidens etc
They are so desperate to actually address the issue, that they would rather do stupid shit like argue the semantics of how long Ashton Kutcher stepped away from acting
"Knock it off!"
Sincerely,
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:00 pm
by pdub
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:55 pm
Apparently if you vote Democrat, you are willing to over look government officials being involved or aware of child sex trafficking operations
Because fuck the pubs. Can't give em anything
"You can give the pubs money."
- Anton Lazzaro
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:05 pm
by KUTradition
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:07 pm
by KUTradition
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:07 pm
by KUTradition
did someone say “every accusation”?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:10 pm
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:55 pm
Apparently if you vote Democrat, you are willing to over look government officials being involved or aware of child sex trafficking operations
Because fuck the pubs. Can't give em anything
Eh, OK.
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/ ... ped-230770
And I fully support ANY government official (or non-government official or any human in general) who is guilty of assaulting an underage child being arrested and prosecuted to the full extent of the law, no matter what political party they represent or vote for.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:10 pm
by jfish26
KUTradition wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:07 pm
did someone say
“every accusation”?
Or “for me but not for thee” (or the inverse, depending on context).
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:12 pm
by KUTradition
i thought randy was “libertarian”
already gave up on that charade?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:16 pm
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:53 pm
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:04 pm
this is a really weird thread bringing out the worst in people.
i didn't realize there was a split down party lines as it relates to teenage girls being kidnapped and sold off to russia or china to work as sex slaves.
i would have figured this was a topic we could all agree on. i guess not.
We all know it's because the lefties are so desperate to avoid admitting that their people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking. Their precious intelligence agencies, the epsteins of the world, and people like the Clinton's, bidens etc
They are so desperate to actually address the issue, that they would rather do stupid shit like argue the semantics of how long Ashton Kutcher stepped away from acting
What people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking? Specifically, what people? Besides "they" of course. Real names. Did I miss a news cycle? What am I so desperate to avoid admitting? Did you share some sort of big reveal and forget to hit the "Submit" button? Or do we all have to wait the infamous "two weeks" before the big reveal happens that we're all so scared of?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:18 pm
by jfish26
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:55 pm
Apparently if you vote Democrat, you are willing to over look government officials being involved or aware of child sex trafficking operations
Because fuck the pubs. Can't give em anything
What exactly are the pubs supposed to be given here? What is being withheld from the pubs here?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:19 pm
by jfish26
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:16 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:53 pm
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:04 pm
this is a really weird thread bringing out the worst in people.
i didn't realize there was a split down party lines as it relates to teenage girls being kidnapped and sold off to russia or china to work as sex slaves.
i would have figured this was a topic we could all agree on. i guess not.
We all know it's because the lefties are so desperate to avoid admitting that their people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking. Their precious intelligence agencies, the epsteins of the world, and people like the Clinton's, bidens etc
They are so desperate to actually address the issue, that they would rather do stupid shit like argue the semantics of how long Ashton Kutcher stepped away from acting
What people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking? Specifically, what people? Besides "they" of course. Real names. Did I miss a news cycle? What am I so desperate to avoid admitting? Did you share some sort of big reveal and forget to hit the "Submit" button? Or do we all have to wait the infamous "two weeks" before the big reveal happens that we're all so scared of?
Something something Epstein something something.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:48 pm
by twocoach
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:19 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:16 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:53 pm
We all know it's because the lefties are so desperate to avoid admitting that their people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking. Their precious intelligence agencies, the epsteins of the world, and people like the Clinton's, bidens etc
They are so desperate to actually address the issue, that they would rather do stupid shit like argue the semantics of how long Ashton Kutcher stepped away from acting
What people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking? Specifically, what people? Besides "they" of course. Real names. Did I miss a news cycle? What am I so desperate to avoid admitting? Did you share some sort of big reveal and forget to hit the "Submit" button? Or do we all have to wait the infamous "two weeks" before the big reveal happens that we're all so scared of?
Something something Epstein something something.
I would have NO PROBLEM with Bill Clinton, or anyone else, being arrested and charged for this if there is enough evidence to justify it. None whatsoever.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:57 pm
by defixione
#39 dropped charges. Thirty-nine is a lot. Are there more?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:09 pm
by JKLivin
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:48 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:19 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:16 pm
What people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking? Specifically, what people? Besides "they" of course. Real names. Did I miss a news cycle? What am I so desperate to avoid admitting? Did you share some sort of big reveal and forget to hit the "Submit" button? Or do we all have to wait the infamous "two weeks" before the big reveal happens that we're all so scared of?
Something something Epstein something something.
I would have NO PROBLEM with Bill Clinton, or anyone else, being arrested and charged for this if there is enough evidence to justify it. None whatsoever.
There’s a reason why Epstein died. When you have information that incriminates powerful people, you tend to cease to live.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:34 pm
by randylahey
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:19 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:16 pm
randylahey wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 2:53 pm
We all know it's because the lefties are so desperate to avoid admitting that their people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking. Their precious intelligence agencies, the epsteins of the world, and people like the Clinton's, bidens etc
They are so desperate to actually address the issue, that they would rather do stupid shit like argue the semantics of how long Ashton Kutcher stepped away from acting
What people are being exposed for being in the know or even involved in child sex trafficking? Specifically, what people? Besides "they" of course. Real names. Did I miss a news cycle? What am I so desperate to avoid admitting? Did you share some sort of big reveal and forget to hit the "Submit" button? Or do we all have to wait the infamous "two weeks" before the big reveal happens that we're all so scared of?
Something something Epstein something something.
The fact you don't understand the gravity of the epstein situation makes you look like a damn fool
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:18 pm
by twocoach
JKLivin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 5:09 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:48 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:19 pm
Something something Epstein something something.
I would have NO PROBLEM with Bill Clinton, or anyone else, being arrested and charged for this if there is enough evidence to justify it. None whatsoever.
There’s a reason why Epstein died. When you have information that incriminates powerful people, you tend to cease to live.
There are lots of plausible reasons as to why Epstein died. Countless pedos who don't have any info over powerful people have chosen suicide over the prospect of getting ass raped in prison for the rest of their lives. I know it's not as much fun as your story but we see actual examples of it all the time.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ful ... sltb.12749
"Eighteen articles were included in the review, with eleven studies meeting criteria for quality assessment. The risk of suicide in perpetrators of CSA and IIOC might be over 100 times that of the general population, although estimates vary widely between studies. Several complex, interlinking factors were identified as associated with risk, including shame, unique demographic characteristics of the offenders, absence of prior criminal contact, and the impact of a criminal investigation."
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:20 pm
by twocoach
defixione wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 3:57 pm
#39 dropped charges. Thirty-nine is a lot. Are there more?
I don't know what you're referring to.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 8:42 pm
by defixione
From the article posted:
"A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13-year-old aspiring teen model has again dropped a federal lawsuit over the alleged assaults.
The accuser, identified in the lawsuit by the pseudonym “Jane Doe,” was expected to appear at a news conference in Los Angeles Wednesday, but that appearance was abruptly canceled."
---Also known as #39.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2023 9:33 pm
by japhy
I recognize the guy on the right, he is the one who talks to his aides about how he would fuck his own daughter. Seems like a decent guy.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 9:16 am
by jfish26
japhy wrote: ↑Fri Jul 21, 2023 9:33 pm
I recognize the guy on the right, he is the one who talks to his aides about how he would fuck his own daughter. Seems like a decent guy.
Least racist president ever, to boot.