Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:46 am
With the key operative being, “to ensure work is not disrupted.”NiceDC wrote: ↑Thu Sep 24, 2020 9:00 am Yes, you have both labor and management preferring inaction. Factories are too cheap and lazy to care, and the labor wants to ensure work is not disrupted to make sure bills are paid. Sports have both sides wanting the same goal, making those billions, and I think both sides are amicable to ensuring that is happening.
Only party left is the government, and after March, nothing has been signed on COVID federally. I agree that the Fed should step in, but we can't even get the government funded as of now. America failed, and failed hard. Government after initial action has done nothing, businesses have pushed as hard as they can to open to the detriment to the public, and my MIL won't put on a mask because F U Obama.
It’s the team admin’s responsibility, as much and in many ways more so, than the lineman’s to make sure the lineman has a healthy practice and game day environment in which to work.
The difference between pro sports and pork is, I suppose, that management views meat packers as individually more fungible than pro athletes, who individually bring unique skill sets that may not be so easily replaced by the next proletariat sucker.