Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2023 3:45 pm
PDub:
Clean up on aisle zsn...
Clean up on aisle zsn...
zsn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 3:14 pmI don’t want to be that guy who quotes his own post. However, this is a very apropos finding. Here’s the US team which competed in the recently concluded International Chemistry Olympiad: Mingwen Dian (CT), Alice Liu (MO), Anurag Sodhi (MD), Phoenix Wu (TX), Sebastian Kumar (WA) and Brian Li (MA). Two Indian Americans, three Chinese Americans and one likely Chinese (maybe Vietnamese).
Da fuq?zsn wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 3:14 pmI don’t want to be that guy who quotes his own post. However, this is a very apropos finding. Here’s the US team which competed in the recently concluded International Chemistry Olympiad: Mingwen Dian (CT), Alice Liu (MO), Anurag Sodhi (MD), Phoenix Wu (TX), Sebastian Kumar (WA) and Brian Li (MA). Two Indian Americans, three Chinese Americans and one likely Chinese (maybe Vietnamese).
What you're saying, then, is "you will not replace us!"zsn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 10:10 am Sorry, that was not my intent at all. Or eugenics or anything. I’m sure now, whatever my point was, was lost in the fray.
We’re running the risk of not expanding our talent base in STEM by not providing opportunities and role models for the largest possible population. I was merely trying to point out that the pool is shrinking rapidly, as opposed to expanding. Affirmative action in secondary and post-secondary education is one of the tools to help address this. I’m not in favor of AA in employment.
We have a far-too-large portion of the white population teaching their children that education is bad and should not be trusted while we have the vast majority of Chinese and Indian Americans rightly teaching their children that education is their best path to success. It's not about "expanding our talent base". We have more potential for talent than any nation in the world. We just have too many people who are not taking advantage of the opportunities provided to them. Yes, we also need to continue to financially support education, particularly in STEM but when so many people are out here championing the "ignorance is to be celebrated" movement then it looks like we're going the wrong direction.zsn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 10:10 am Sorry, that was not my intent at all. Or eugenics or anything. I’m sure now, whatever my point was, was lost in the fray.
We’re running the risk of not expanding our talent base in STEM by not providing opportunities and role models for the largest possible population. I was merely trying to point out that the pool is shrinking rapidly, as opposed to expanding. Affirmative action in secondary and post-secondary education is one of the tools to help address this. I’m not in favor of AA in employment.
I’m saying exactly the opposite. Regardless of the underlying reason (many theories are proposed) the Spelling Bee, Chemistry Olympiad etc are dominated by Asian Americans (Indian, Chinese and other East-/ South Asian origin kids). If it’s purely based on grades and accomplishments similar outcomes would result in most institutions of higher education (legacy admissions notwithstanding).
Who knows, 100 years from now white people might need Affirmative Action to help boost their college attendance numbers.zsn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:52 pmI’m saying exactly the opposite. Regardless of the underlying reason (many theories are proposed) the Spelling Bee, Chemistry Olympiad etc are dominated by Asian Americans (Indian, Chinese and other East-/ South Asian origin kids). If it’s purely based on grades and accomplishments similar outcomes would result in most institutions of higher education (legacy admissions notwithstanding).
I was facetiously insinuating that maybe that’s Vivek’s not-so-secret intention, to have Indian Americans dominate everything
I think Vivek’s contention is that life should be primarily merit-based. I think the world would be much better that way.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:13 pmWho knows, 100 years from now white people might need Affirmative Action to help boost their college attendance numbers.zsn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:52 pmI’m saying exactly the opposite. Regardless of the underlying reason (many theories are proposed) the Spelling Bee, Chemistry Olympiad etc are dominated by Asian Americans (Indian, Chinese and other East-/ South Asian origin kids). If it’s purely based on grades and accomplishments similar outcomes would result in most institutions of higher education (legacy admissions notwithstanding).
I was facetiously insinuating that maybe that’s Vivek’s not-so-secret intention, to have Indian Americans dominate everything
I don't necessarily disagree. I have been fine with Affirmative Action going away for a while now. It will just be interesting to see how much "merit-based" ability the portion of our nation currently vilifying teachers and education have in another generation or two.JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 6:59 pmI think Vivek’s contention is that life should be primarily merit-based. I think the world would be much better that way.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:13 pmWho knows, 100 years from now white people might need Affirmative Action to help boost their college attendance numbers.zsn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 4:52 pm
I’m saying exactly the opposite. Regardless of the underlying reason (many theories are proposed) the Spelling Bee, Chemistry Olympiad etc are dominated by Asian Americans (Indian, Chinese and other East-/ South Asian origin kids). If it’s purely based on grades and accomplishments similar outcomes would result in most institutions of higher education (legacy admissions notwithstanding).
I was facetiously insinuating that maybe that’s Vivek’s not-so-secret intention, to have Indian Americans dominate everything
If schools refocused on education and de-emphasized social indoctrination, the vilification would evaporate in no time. Kids might get smarter, too.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:32 pmI don't necessarily disagree. I have been fine with Affirmative Action going away for a while now. It will just be interesting to see how much "merit-based" ability the portion of our nation currently vilifying teachers and education have in another generation or two.
^^^jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:51 pm I don't think anyone's against a purely merit-based utopia.
I think the devil of course is in the details - namely that we're not, in my opinion, remotely close to a place where opportunity is equal such that candidates are competing on a level playing field.
Clearly no one has found a good answer for what to do here, because this is one area where each individual game is zero sum; give preference to Profile X, and you're obviously disadvantaging Profiles Y and Z.
I can say I'd be significantly more aligned with the right's efforts to end Affirmative Action-type programs if the right was ALSO more aligned with progressive policies designed to actually help lower- and lower-middle-class kids and families (like free, universal pre-K, etc.).
People who complain about everything seem to always find something to complain about. Sorry, but this "de-emphasized social indoctrination" shtick is obscenely overstated.JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:43 pmIf schools refocused on education and de-emphasized social indoctrination, the vilification would evaporate in no time. Kids might get smarter, too.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:32 pmI don't necessarily disagree. I have been fine with Affirmative Action going away for a while now. It will just be interesting to see how much "merit-based" ability the portion of our nation currently vilifying teachers and education have in another generation or two.
Agreed. It's kinda hard to compete in a race when one kid only has to run a 50 meter dash while others have to run 100 meters. It would be a lot easier to take the "it's all about the kids" and "let's focus on education" people seriously if they invested in better schools for the communities around them.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:51 pm I don't think anyone's against a purely merit-based utopia.
I think the devil of course is in the details - namely that we're not, in my opinion, remotely close to a place where opportunity is equal such that candidates are competing on a level playing field.
Clearly no one has found a good answer for what to do here, because this is one area where each individual game is zero sum; give preference to Profile X, and you're obviously disadvantaging Profiles Y and Z.
I can say I'd be significantly more aligned with the right's efforts to end Affirmative Action-type programs if the right was ALSO more aligned with progressive policies designed to actually help lower- and lower-middle-class kids and families (like free, universal pre-K, etc.).
I have had three kids go through the public schools. I don't know how many you have had, but I found the undermining of the values taught at home to be alarming and disgraceful, as was the lack of time and attention to important matters like reading, spelling, math, and writing. My fourth child will not be in public school, even if I have to home school her myself.twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 8:25 amPeople who complain about everything seem to always find something to complain about. Sorry, but this "de-emphasized social indoctrination" shtick is obscenely overstated.JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:43 pmIf schools refocused on education and de-emphasized social indoctrination, the vilification would evaporate in no time. Kids might get smarter, too.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:32 pm
I don't necessarily disagree. I have been fine with Affirmative Action going away for a while now. It will just be interesting to see how much "merit-based" ability the portion of our nation currently vilifying teachers and education have in another generation or two.