Oh, and that wasn't a critique of Polis from my perspective.
It probably brought on a relapse of Shirley's facial twitching, though.
And Lord knows what it might do to Sparky.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:22 am
by JKLivin
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:19 am
Not Whitmer.
She's imabalanced.
As a resident of Michigan, I can tell you that Whitmer is not liked by anyone outside of Detroit and Ann Arbor. Michigan is kind of like Kansas. In terms of square miles, 99% votes conservative, but the metropolitan high-density pockets like Douglas and Johnson counties in Kansas dictate who ends up as governor.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:32 am
by japhy
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:19 am
Not Whitmer.
She's imabalanced.
And convicted rapist trump would spend his residency fantasizing about fucking the daughters.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:37 am
by Overlander
randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:21 am
Spittin facts here
"Spittin facts here".
You wouldn't know a fact if it laid eggs in your tiny little ovaries.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:41 am
by Overlander
randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:21 am
Spittin facts here
Here is what an ACTUAL PhD responded to your "expert":
"What all this really means is the denialists are so desperate to find PhD level researchers with relevant training that they are using graduate students to promote their deeply flawed logic"
Bob Morris, MD, PhD.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:45 am
by defixione
Did anyone else see any facts in there? I only read undocumented statements and opinions.
randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:21 am
Spittin facts here
Here is what an ACTUAL PhD responded to your "expert":
"What all this really means is the denialists are so desperate to find PhD level researchers with relevant training that they are using graduate students to promote their deeply flawed logic"
Bob Morris, MD, PhD.
Hey, that's the guy who beat Kentucky in the first round of the NIT that one year
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:51 am
by jfish26
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:45 am
Did anyone else see any facts in there? I only read undocumented statements and opinions.
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:19 am
Not Whitmer.
She's imabalanced.
And convicted rapist trump would spend his residency fantasizing about fucking the daughters.
That is a legally inaccurate description, FTR. He's grotesque, to be sure, and violent and depraved and all the rest. But he is not a convicted rapist.
Besides, you would pay good money to watch "the daughters" deal with Trump -- assuming he could catch them.
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:19 am
Not Whitmer.
She's imabalanced.
And convicted rapist trump would spend his residency fantasizing about fucking the daughters.
That is a legally inaccurate description, FTR. He's grotesque, to be sure, and violent and depraved and all the rest. But he is not a convicted rapist.
Besides, you would pay good money to watch "the daughters" deal with Trump -- assuming he could catch them.
I mean - disagree if you want, but this has been legally settled to the contrary:
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 11:19 am
Not Whitmer.
She's imabalanced.
And convicted rapist trump would spend his residency fantasizing about fucking the daughters.
That is a legally inaccurate description, FTR. He's grotesque, to be sure, and violent and depraved and all the rest. But he is not a convicted rapist.
Besides, you would pay good money to watch "the daughters" deal with Trump -- assuming he could catch them.
Satan is not the devil, he is a fallen angel.
And kicking the ass of a degenerate con man really isn't going to do any good for my daughters or yours.
Save your but, but, but, technicalities for someone who deserves those efforts. We both know that trump deserves every slur anyone throws at him and some prison time to boot.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 12:56 pm
by Shirley
Sparko wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 12:24 pm
Whitmer it is then.
If only dems had this guy:
Today In: Mike so maverick!
Or,
Pence is working the wrong poll
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 12:57 pm
by jhawks99
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 10:45 am
if i was an illegal homeless drug addict i would get myself to california. be crazy not to.
Cuz all the "legal" ones are in Kentucky
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 1:01 pm
by DCHawk1
jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 12:23 pm
I mean - disagree if you want, but this has been legally settled to the contrary:
I don't disagree that he raped her. Gaia knows the man is capable of it and so much worse.
But -- and as a lawyer, you know this well -- he was NOT convicted of rape.
And convicted rapist trump would spend his residency fantasizing about fucking the daughters.
That is a legally inaccurate description, FTR. He's grotesque, to be sure, and violent and depraved and all the rest. But he is not a convicted rapist.
Besides, you would pay good money to watch "the daughters" deal with Trump -- assuming he could catch them.
Satan is not the devil, he is a fallen angel.
And kicking the ass of a degenerate con man really isn't going to do any good for my daughters or yours.
Save your but, but, but, technicalities for someone who deserves those efforts. We both know that trump deserves every slur anyone throws at him and some prison time to boot.
It's not my fault you never learned to self-edit. "Rapist" would have been a perfectly accurate description. But...as is the wont of the polemicist, you added words that both diluted your statement and challenged its accuracy.