Kansas Crimson

You could just turn it off and go do something you enjoy instead of continuing to get worked up over a tv station.

Tv program. Whatever.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:57 pm poor poor keeds in their maga hats.

The subtext of your position is that anyone wearing a MAGA hat deserves to have bad things happen to them. Surely you can see how hypocritical that idea is.

I do enjoy it. And I’m not worked up, at least not in any more than a giggly way.

And if you think my Fox News consumption is bothersome, what to think of the millions of Mericans who take this shit seriously?!

I watch it with a sense of satire. Most other viewers watch in a sincere way that overwhelmingly influences their national and world views.

Just ask my dad michhawk!

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 11:09 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:57 pm poor poor keeds in their maga hats.

The subtext of your position is that anyone wearing a MAGA hat deserves to have bad things happen to them. Surely you can see how hypocritical that idea is.

All I’ll say about this right now is, actually I don’t want bad things to happen to anyone.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2020 10:57 pm poor poor keeds in their maga hats.

What's the most important word in that sentence?

I’ll guess one of the poors, but I can’t decide which.

so close...

Okay - keeds?

I guess I get that angle, I guess. But it still seems like kind of a cop out. And I still struggle to believe they’re just a bunch of little angels.

I mean what does smartassedly staring down and smirking at an injun have to do with a pro-life rally?

Do you actually still think that's what happened?

Epistemic closure.

Do you actually think those keeds are little angels?

And okay okay. Last guess: the most important word in that sentence was obviously MAGA

That's not the only other option.

What’s the other option?

Ugh. I’m quitting this thread, and Fox News.

But first, if we may discuss Ted Cruz:

“The senate will actually allow the president to present his case and defend himself, unlike house democrats.”

Yes.

And?

i thought the house invited him...

no?

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 14, 2020 9:09 am Yes.

And?

...and did the House prevent the potus from presenting a case and defend himself?

Uhh...yes?

That's not where these defenses are made.

How so?

So, Trump is welcome to testify, but no one else?

Seems legit.