Page 82 of 235
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:08 pm
by PhDhawk
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:45 pm
If regular students can work without restrictions on what type of work, who they're working for, or how much they're getting paid, then athletes should have the same opportunities.
There are restrictions for lots of students.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:09 pm
by PhDhawk
Geezer wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:37 pm
You have a job in your field of study?
What's your point?
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:15 am
by Deleted User 310
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:08 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:45 pm
If regular students can work without restrictions on what type of work, who they're working for, or how much they're getting paid, then athletes should have the same opportunities.
There are restrictions for lots of students.
Such as?
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:29 am
by PhDhawk
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:15 am
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:08 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:45 pm
If regular students can work without restrictions on what type of work, who they're working for, or how much they're getting paid, then athletes should have the same opportunities.
There are restrictions for lots of students.
Such as?
Lots of private schools limit the number of hours you can work often to 10-15 hours. Law students have restrictions from the ABA. There are also gov't approved programs that allow some retail jobs to pay college students less than minimum wage under the guise it's good for them.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:34 am
by Deleted User 310
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:29 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 12:15 am
PhDhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:08 pm
There are restrictions for lots of students.
Such as?
Lots of private schools limit the number of hours you can work often to 10-15 hours. Law students have restrictions from the ABA. There are also gov't approved programs that allow some retail jobs to pay college students less than minimum wage under the guise it's good for them.
Appreciate the info. I had no idea any of those restrictions existed.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:03 am
by sdoyel
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:35 am
by NDballer13
For the people who think this is a preview of what to expect, at the least, for KU please remember OSU had a smoking gun in their case. Also that this is an NCAA punishment and not dealt with by the independent panel. Still not a promising sign to see one of the FBI schools go down.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:42 am
by pdub
So...Cade Cunningham?
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:17 pm
by NDballer13
One can only assume he played a role in them getting this ban. If he tries to opt out of his LOI, I would think a lot of schools would stay away from him due to eligibility concerns. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if he announces he's going the G League route by the end of the weekend.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:25 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
I don't think he was the subject of anything at Evans's trial.
And, I'd take him in Lawrence in a heartbeat.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:27 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:38 pm
by jfish26
Cooperating with the NCAA is about as smart as a crackhead responding to one of those meth inspection, contact-your-local-police facebook ads.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 1:45 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:29 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
So, basically punt the football defense and keep the defense team's focus on basketball.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:28 am
by jfish26
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:29 pm
So, basically punt the football defense and keep the defense team's focus on basketball.
Yes.
I found it interesting, in KU's filing supporting referral to the IARP, to see them articulate an argument that evidence introduced in the FBI criminal trials is being applied here "in the least favorable light" to KU. I think that, along with the ridiculousness of establishing that shoe company employees
are "boosters", is a strong argument.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:50 am
by CrimsonNBlue
This is public at this point, but little birdies have been telling me KU and KUAC are rapidly bleeding money. More furlough talk.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:57 am
by jfish26
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:50 am
This is public at this point, but little birdies have been telling me KU and KUAC are rapidly bleeding money. More furlough talk.
Would be interesting to know how this particular fight is funded.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:03 am
by CrimsonNBlue
I highly doubt KU is funding. All KUAC.
It may have just eaten up a retainer.
KUAC, maybe not so surprisingly, reported they came out in the black for 2019-20.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:43 am
by CrimsonNBlue
JFC. The irony and bad faith of this is too much to handle.
Re: F the NCAA
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 10:49 am
by holidaysmore
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 9:50 am
This is public at this point, but little birdies have been telling me KU and KUAC are rapidly bleeding money. More furlough talk.
On top of the furloughs they have already announced?