Kansas Crimson

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:28 am

Grandma wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:20 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:46 am What i do find sort of funny is that after months of hearing the president say "soon or within weeks" and then hearing CNN say no chance it'll be middle of 2021....now it is going to be by the end of December. Shocker? This thing has become such a political tool that it is sickening. 250k-ish lives lost is not a tool. The tone is instantly changing in the media. Suddenly the articles are mostly about hope and not doom and gloom.

I am going to ask this question because I admit I am thoroughly confused.
Trump repeatedly said a vaccine is coming soon.
Jr. is now tweeting this shit -
"The timing of this is pretty amazing. Nothing nefarious about the timing of this at all right?"
He added a face with rolling eyes emoji.
So does he even know if he is coming or going? His head is spinning so fast these days he continues to make himself be seen as a clueless asshole on a minute by minute basis - and he's getting off on it.

He just tweeted this - "I do I do. Turns out it’s only deranged sociopaths on the left that burn down cities when they don’t get their way".
These fuckers (the Trumps) are STILL trying their best to DIVIDE the country as much as possible - and do it in a manner which PROVES they are completely clueless/ignorant.

I blame Trump for his fair share absolutely...i was simply talking about the media in that particular post

I don't really see why i would blame trump jr. I don't follow him on twitter because he is an idiot. He is also not the president....but he certainly doesn't help his followers be any more reasonable that is for sure.


As far as the divide, the trumps aren't forcing anyone to be hateful. That is their own choice. It is why the sudden calls for unity give some an eyeroll. All the hate from each side the last 4 years was not because trump made them say mean things to each other. It is because the people doing it are hateful. Right or wrong, nobody makes you be something you're not. You choose that.

Kindness doesn't begin and end with the president. The president doesn't have the power to make you hateful towards others.

First, safety: as mRNA is a non-infectious, non-integrating platform, there is no potential risk of infection or insertional mutagenesis. Additionally, mRNA is degraded by normal cellular processes, and its in vivo half-life can be regulated through the use of various modifications and delivery methods9,10,11,12. The inherent immunogenicity of the mRNA can be down-modulated to further increase the safety profile

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:18 am Here's a good review on mRNA based vaccines if anyone is curious.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.243

For those concerned about safety:

First, safety: as mRNA is a non-infectious, non-integrating platform, there is no potential risk of infection or insertional mutagenesis. Additionally, mRNA is degraded by normal cellular processes, and its in vivo half-life can be regulated through the use of various modifications and delivery methods9,10,11,12. The inherent immunogenicity of the mRNA can be down-modulated to further increase the safety profile

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:21 am

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:18 am Here's a good review on mRNA based vaccines if anyone is curious.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.243

For those concerned about safety:

First, safety: as mRNA is a non-infectious, non-integrating platform, there is no potential risk of infection or insertional mutagenesis. Additionally, mRNA is degraded by normal cellular processes, and its in vivo half-life can be regulated through the use of various modifications and delivery methods9,10,11,12. The inherent immunogenicity of the mRNA can be down-modulated to further increase the safety profile

in short you feel very confident they will be safe?

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:57 am 90% figure comes with a pretty significant asterisk.

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 11:11 am

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:57 am 90% figure comes with a pretty significant asterisk.

duration of protection?

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:06 am It would be someone like Ben Carson.

TDub wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 3:36 pm Rough. Sorry fish

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 3:59 pm Utah finally instituted mask mandate as of 9:30 last night, along with no social gatherings outside of household...except for, ya know, sporting events

smfh