Kansas Crimson

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:13 pm

Feral wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 3:56 pm

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 3:50 pm I’d vote for mittens.

That's because you, Mich, are a great American.

Or, something.

Remember when he put his dog on the roof of the car? And when he picked on the gay kid in high school?

Good times.

If there's one thing we can be sure of, Trump would never have made fun of a gay person. But he probably did worse things to a dog.

zsn wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:17 pm It's not a reflection of how high Mitt has risen, but one of how low the other Republicans have sunk

So say you, a non-Republican voter who doesn’t want them to act in the best interests of their party. I’m guessing they don’t really care what you think.

Biden is so all over the place in this town hall.

He did handle the Rush question very well, and I can't say I disagree with him on much of it.

Not so funny how the most "qualified" candidate may be toast.
I strongly believe if the guy ran in 2016 he would be our President today.
I also strongly believe we are going to see 4 more years of Trump. Well, at least see Trump elected to serve for 4 more years.
Yep, this is America in 2020. Sad.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:13 pm

zsn wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:17 pm It's not a reflection of how high Mitt has risen, but one of how low the other Republicans have sunk

So say you, a non-Republican voter who doesn’t want them to act in the best interests of their party. I’m guessing they don’t really care what you think.

This seems to sum up the modern gop well.

Act only in the best interests of the party. Who cares what anyone else thinks?

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:23 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:13 pm

zsn wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:17 pm It's not a reflection of how high Mitt has risen, but one of how low the other Republicans have sunk

So say you, a non-Republican voter who doesn’t want them to act in the best interests of their party. I’m guessing they don’t really care what you think.

This seems to sum up the modern gop well.

Act only in the best interests of the party. Who cares what anyone else thinks?

Oh for christ sakes, that's exactly what both sides always do during impeachments...well, except for the 1 republican who crossed party lines (and good for him if he truly thought that's what his verdict should have been).

Stop acting like holding party lines is unique to the GOP.

The Dems have been set on overturning this election since the night the outcome became clear. They even have said so. It's not legitimate and won't be legitimate if he wins again. CNN said that.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:23 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:13 pm

zsn wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 4:17 pm It's not a reflection of how high Mitt has risen, but one of how low the other Republicans have sunk

So say you, a non-Republican voter who doesn’t want them to act in the best interests of their party. I’m guessing they don’t really care what you think.

This seems to sum up the modern gop well.

Act only in the best interests of the party. Who cares what anyone else thinks?

exactly...party over country

or better yet, re-election over country

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:52 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:23 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 6:13 pm

So say you, a non-Republican voter who doesn’t want them to act in the best interests of their party. I’m guessing they don’t really care what you think.

This seems to sum up the modern gop well.

Act only in the best interests of the party. Who cares what anyone else thinks?

exactly...party over country

or better yet, re-election over country

How does removing a duly-elected sitting President who has committed no criminal acts benefit the country? I think you are conflating soothing butthurt libs with benefitting the country as a whole.

The re-election over country is the interesting part.

Republicans have bet the farm on Trump. They better hope he doesn’t fuck it up between now and November.

No more than Dems bet the farm on Hilary.

There will be 2 options. Each side bets the farm on their candidate. In every single fucking election. Good lord. It's hard to believe the hysteria is getting worse, but it is. And all signs point to reelection at this point it seems.

Biden washed up, in part because of innuendos re Ukraine. Put a fork in him.

Biden is the only candidate who will guarantee a Trump re-election.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:01 am How does removing a duly-elected sitting President who has committed no criminal acts benefit the country?

You may want to check with Sen Alexander and Rubio before making that statement - the "no criminal acts" part. Stay with the party line here, sport: the latest one is "So #^$ what". "No criminal acts" was so December.

zsn wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 10:45 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:01 am How does removing a duly-elected sitting President who has committed no criminal acts benefit the country?

You may want to check with Sen Alexander and Rubio before making that statement - the "no criminal acts" part. Stay with the party line here, sport: the latest one is "So #^$ what". "No criminal acts" was so December.

Lulz.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:01 am

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:52 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:23 am

This seems to sum up the modern gop well.

Act only in the best interests of the party. Who cares what anyone else thinks?

exactly...party over country

or better yet, re-election over country

How does removing a duly-elected sitting President who has committed no criminal acts benefit the country? I think you are conflating soothing butthurt libs with benefitting the country as a whole.

The GAO announced in January that Trump's decision to freeze the release of security assistance to Ukraine violated the law.

Of course they did.

LOL

Campaign finance violations are against the law right?

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:52 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 9:01 am

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:52 am
exactly...party over country

or better yet, re-election over country

How does removing a duly-elected sitting President who has committed no criminal acts benefit the country? I think you are conflating soothing butthurt libs with benefitting the country as a whole.

The GAO announced in January that Trump's decision to freeze the release of security assistance to Ukraine violated the law.

What law, Trump doesn’t need any stinkin’ Laws!

More and more, I think dems are best to go all in on Pete.

He’s not over 70. He has that small town midwestern thing going for him. And if and when Trump’s campaign rhetoric turns to red meat for the base, that seems more likely to backfire than any other of the inevitable personal attacks.

i’d vote for pete