Kansas Crimson

Cascadia wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:23 am I would think "sticking it to the man" and "owning the libs" would bolster his career rather than jeopardize it.

^^

sdoyel wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:16 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 7:45 am soo when do we get to subpoena Hannity?!?!?!!!

When does he get fired (like Cuomo did) ???

Am i missing something like usual? Why would he get fired for trying to do the right thing?

If he wasn’t in the wrong, now’s his chance to set the record straight.

What way did Hannity know Trump was “being told” Jan. 6 would happen? Why didn’t he think things would go down that way?

Lemme both sides this for you guys:

If congress had text messages from Rachel Maddow like “I just don’t see BeNgHaZi going down the way Hilldog is being told” would you still be so eager to just shrug that one off too?

Your only real concern would still be Rachel Maddow’s personal career earning potential, right?

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:13 pm If he wasn’t in the wrong, now’s his chance to set the record straight.

What way did Hannity know Trump was “being told” Jan. 6 would happen? Why didn’t he think things would go down that way?

I am interpreting that part way differently than you apparently.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:13 pm If he wasn’t in the wrong, now’s his chance to set the record straight.

What way did Hannity know Trump was “being told” Jan. 6 would happen? Why didn’t he think things would go down that way?

Because it was all out in the open.

Plenty of people were saying that what happened would happen. That's the problem with this whole investigation. It's looking for a conspiracy. I would guess the closest they could get to that is the Trump/Byrne/Powell/Flynn meeting, but multiple parties have already discussed that, so it's already out in the open.

All of it is out in the open. The problem is that by January 8th, one side just didn't care about it anymore.

Weren't almost all of us very concerned about Jan 6 before it happened? I don't think many of us thought the gathering was going to be a good thing.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:15 pm Lemme both sides this for you guys:

If congress had text messages from Rachel Maddow like “I just don’t see BeNgHaZi going down the way Hilldog is being told” would you still be so eager to just shrug that one off too?

Your only real concern would still be Rachel Maddow’s personal career earning potential, right?

Illy, that you? You asked why Hannity might defy a subpoena, and when an answer was given you act like we're the ones who brought it up and are defending him

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:20 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:13 pm If he wasn’t in the wrong, now’s his chance to set the record straight.

What way did Hannity know Trump was “being told” Jan. 6 would happen? Why didn’t he think things would go down that way?

I am interpreting that part way differently than you apparently.

Now do “we good”

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:30 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:20 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:13 pm If he wasn’t in the wrong, now’s his chance to set the record straight.

What way did Hannity know Trump was “being told” Jan. 6 would happen? Why didn’t he think things would go down that way?

I am interpreting that part way differently than you apparently.

Now do “we good”

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:30 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:20 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:13 pm If he wasn’t in the wrong, now’s his chance to set the record straight.

What way did Hannity know Trump was “being told” Jan. 6 would happen? Why didn’t he think things would go down that way?

I am interpreting that part way differently than you apparently.

Now do “we good”

LOL

Come on man. If Self didn't know what was going on he had absolutely no reason to talk to that guy or facilitate relationships between him and players handlers.

And tbh, I'd be more worried if Self didn't know what Gasnola was doing since they were/are close friends.

Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:24 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:15 pm Lemme both sides this for you guys:

If congress had text messages from Rachel Maddow like “I just don’t see BeNgHaZi going down the way Hilldog is being told” would you still be so eager to just shrug that one off too?

Your only real concern would still be Rachel Maddow’s personal career earning potential, right?

Illy, that you? You asked why Hannity might defy a subpoena, and when an answer was given you act like we're the ones who brought it up and are defending him

Do you NOT mean to defend him?

Here we have what very well may be one of the biggest and most ridiculous national security issues in Merican history, and your biggest concern seems to be whether a journalist can cash in on it?

Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:24 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:15 pm Lemme both sides this for you guys:

If congress had text messages from Rachel Maddow like “I just don’t see BeNgHaZi going down the way Hilldog is being told” would you still be so eager to just shrug that one off too?

Your only real concern would still be Rachel Maddow’s personal career earning potential, right?

Illy, that you? You asked why Hannity might defy a subpoena, and when an answer was given you act like we're the ones who brought it up and are defending him

He got you with the loaded question.

Qusdahl101

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:33 pm

Mjl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:24 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:15 pm Lemme both sides this for you guys:

If congress had text messages from Rachel Maddow like “I just don’t see BeNgHaZi going down the way Hilldog is being told” would you still be so eager to just shrug that one off too?

Your only real concern would still be Rachel Maddow’s personal career earning potential, right?

Illy, that you? You asked why Hannity might defy a subpoena, and when an answer was given you act like we're the ones who brought it up and are defending him

Do you NOT mean to defend him?

Here we have what very well may be one of the biggest and most ridiculous national security issues in Merican history, and your biggest concern seems to be whether a journalist can cash in on it?

My biggest concern? YOU brought him up!

Oh, sorry, I didn’t realize the Jan. 6 riot was not a concern to you.

Carry on.

#MAGA

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:33 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:30 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:20 pm
I am interpreting that part way differently than you apparently.

Now do “we good”

LOL

Come on man. If Sean didn't know what was going on he had absolutely no reason to talk to that guy or facilitate relationships between him and Trump’s handlers.

And tbh, I'd be more worried if Sean didn't know what Trump was doing since they were/are close friends.

Fyp?

If only overthrowing democracy was as big a deal as shoe money.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:47 pm Oh, sorry, I didn’t realize the Jan. 6 riot was not a concern to you.

Carry on.

#MAGA

Holy shit, you've gone full Illy.

I'm concerned about it. I'm not concerned about minor details about it like "What did Hannity know?". YOU brought him up. What the fuck is wrong with you? You bring him up and then say when I dismiss him that I am the one that cares about only the very thing I'm dismissing. Fucking bizarre world.

I didn’t bring him up tho.

Congress did.

They tried to overthrow an election right out there in the open. That should be the major concern. Relative to that who gives a fuck about some texts from Sean Hannity, unless you're just looking for a massive conspiracy

You’re the one bringing up conspiracy.

And to answer your question about who gives a fuck about texts from Sean Hannity - Congress does.

Now I honestly didn’t intend to trigger anyone or turn this too into yet another shit throwing contest, so maybe we should all just chill out and have a cup of chamomile or sumptin.