DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 2:37 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 2:27 pm
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 2:20 pm
Because it's only natural to assume that the cocaine found in the White House belongs to the recovering coke addict who (more or less) lives there right now.
Just because it's highly unlikely to be his doesn't mean that it's especially out of line to wonder if it is.
And I suspect you know that.
This is an enormously silly* (not to mention bad-faith) conclusion to jump to. Especially for someone who should know better, about the effect on some that amplifying silly bad-faith conclusions has.
And you know that.
* I trust I need not explain that someone with Hunter’s track record - let alone profile - is not the sort who would get caught in this way.
As I said, I think you know better. It is hardly "silly." It is perfectly understandable in our typically superficial news environment. As I said, it's exceptionally unlikely and inarguably based on zero evidence, but none of that counters our natural desire for salaciousness in our "news."
* I trust I need not explain that addicts sometimes do amazingly stupid things -- like get strippers pregnant, for example.
Mileage varies, I guess. I think it’s extremely irresponsible for a smart person to, with only
incredibly tenuous circumstantial evidence, amplify conspiracy theories that have clearly infected people you know will read what you’re amplifying.
And of course that’s why you’re seeing pre-buttals of the “but Don Jr” angle. People irresponsibly making a Hunter connection here KNOW that what they’re doing is silly and wrong, and they’re already battening down the hatches.