Page 89 of 320

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:52 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
Overlander wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:46 pm
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:39 pm
Overlander wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:17 pm

In this one, Ivanka has a “call the police” vibe about her.

Maybe because her Daddy and Jeffrey Epstein just pimped her out? Probably not. I'm just asking.
If we were to make assumptions why not conclude she looks repulsed and drugged out in this photo?


Image
Or, that difficult age where she is able to think “should my dad have his finger THERE?”

Hey kids, let's hang out with Uncle Jeffrey!

Image

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:24 pm
by japhy
He Uncle Joe might have done it too!

Of course the two people who stole personal belongings are now convicted felons waiting for sentencing and James O'Keefe was kicked out of Project "Veritas" for being skeezy. Let that sink in, James O'Keefe is too skeezy to be around the Project "Veritas" office. And that same skeeze had determined that the "authenticity" of the diary was too questionable for Project "Veritas" to publish. Wuuuut, even skeezy James O'Keefe think something is too skeezy to publish. But the "excerpts" being passed around are authentic enough for the the beta cultboys.

Somebody let me know when they get receipts.

trumpty dumpty proudly posed for the receipts of his skeeze. Cuz all publicity, regardless of how skeezy, is good publicity.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:33 pm
by japhy
Overlander wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:17 pm
japhy wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 4:33 pm Image
Holy fuck!
Pretty standard father and daughter in bed photo.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:33 pm
by JKLivin
japhy wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:24 pm He Uncle Joe might have done it too!

Of course the two people who stole personal belongings are now convicted felons waiting for sentencing and James O'Keefe was kicked out of Project "Veritas" for being skeezy. Let that sink in, James O'Keefe is too skeezy to be around the Project "Veritas" office. And that same skeeze had determined that the "authenticity" of the diary was too questionable for Project "Veritas" to publish. Wuuuut, even skeezy James O'Keefe think something is too skeezy to publish. But the "excerpts" being passed around are authentic enough for the the beta cultboys.

Somebody let me know when they get receipts.

trumpty dumpty proudly posed for the receipts of his skeeze. Cuz all publicity, regardless of how skeezy, is good publicity.
And yet, James O’Keefe is flourishing on his own and Project Veritas is shutting its doors. What is it they say about karma?

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:46 pm
by DCHawk1
Sparko wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:32 pm Refuse the help offered. Do not partake of graciousness. Deride good works. No way for anyone to live Psych. Or DC. Being wrong leaves a mark on your own lives. Being willfully blind, you can't see it. Sad.
What are you even talking about?

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:48 pm
by DCHawk1
japhy wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:24 pm He Uncle Joe might have done it too!

Of course the two people who stole personal belongings are now convicted felons waiting for sentencing and James O'Keefe was kicked out of Project "Veritas" for being skeezy. Let that sink in, James O'Keefe is too skeezy to be around the Project "Veritas" office. And that same skeeze had determined that the "authenticity" of the diary was too questionable for Project "Veritas" to publish. Wuuuut, even skeezy James O'Keefe think something is too skeezy to publish. But the "excerpts" being passed around are authentic enough for the the beta cultboys.

Somebody let me know when they get receipts.

trumpty dumpty proudly posed for the receipts of his skeeze. Cuz all publicity, regardless of how skeezy, is good publicity.
I mean, lulz.

Re: 2024

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:23 pm
by Overlander
japhy wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:33 pm
Overlander wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:17 pm
japhy wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 4:33 pm Image
Holy fuck!
Pretty standard father and daughter in bed photo.
Yeah, nothing to see here….

Re: 2024

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2023 10:17 pm
by ousdahl

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:45 am
by jfish26
The Post itself is expressing doubt about that poll.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:47 am
by DCHawk1
jfish26 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:45 am The Post itself is expressing doubt about that poll.
Which is hilarious.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:14 am
by Shirley
DCHawk1 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:47 am
jfish26 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:45 am The Post itself is expressing doubt about that poll.
Which is hilarious.
It is hilarious, but if they were going to release the results, it was the right thing to do.

And, regrettably, if the point of a poll is to attract eyes, mission accomplished.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:19 am
by jfish26
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:14 am
DCHawk1 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:47 am
jfish26 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:45 am The Post itself is expressing doubt about that poll.
Which is hilarious.
It is hilarious, but if they were going to release the results, it was the right thing to do.

And, regrettably, if the point of a poll is to attract eyes, mission accomplished.
They had to release the results.

Even though - I hope you're sitting down - the logic wouldn't hold up, you can just imagine the screeching from the MAGAverse if the Amazon Washington Post had SUPPRESSED facts PROVING that Donald Trump is FAR AND AWAY leading Sleepy Joe in the polls.

So instead, just like in the Menendez situation (vis a vis Democrats and the DOJ), the MAGAverse is now punishing the Post for doing the right thing.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:34 am
by Shirley
I agree, they did have to.

My POV immediately went to basic scientific research, where anyone whose integrity loses out to a hoped-for, preconceived result, is anathema to the entire process.

“Research is the process of going up alleys to see if they are blind.” — Marston Bates (1950)

Which is to say, all research is valuable including your "negative" results, because it helps other researchers avoid wasting their time.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:39 am
by jfish26
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:34 am I agree, they did have to.

My POV immediately went to basic scientific research, where anyone whose integrity loses out to a hoped-for, preconceived result, is anathema to the entire process.

“Research is the process of going up alleys to see if they are blind.” — Marston Bates (1950)

Which is to say, all research is valuable including your "negative" results, because it helps other researchers avoid wasting their time.
(Of course, it's important to remember that the MAGAverse can ALWAYS find something to screech about. So the next thing will be screeching over this errant poll being ELECTION INTERFERENCE because it's mobilizing the Ds.)

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:09 am
by Shirley
jfish26 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:39 am
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:34 am I agree, they did have to.

My POV immediately went to basic scientific research, where anyone whose integrity loses out to a hoped-for, preconceived result, is anathema to the entire process.

“Research is the process of going up alleys to see if they are blind.” — Marston Bates (1950)

Which is to say, all research is valuable including your "negative" results, because it helps other researchers avoid wasting their time.
(Of course, it's important to remember that the MAGAverse can ALWAYS find something to screech about. So the next thing will be screeching over this errant poll being ELECTION INTERFERENCE because it's mobilizing the Ds.)
Haha!

And sometimes I think I’m cynical.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:39 am
by jfish26
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:09 am
jfish26 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:39 am
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 10:34 am I agree, they did have to.

My POV immediately went to basic scientific research, where anyone whose integrity loses out to a hoped-for, preconceived result, is anathema to the entire process.

“Research is the process of going up alleys to see if they are blind.” — Marston Bates (1950)

Which is to say, all research is valuable including your "negative" results, because it helps other researchers avoid wasting their time.
(Of course, it's important to remember that the MAGAverse can ALWAYS find something to screech about. So the next thing will be screeching over this errant poll being ELECTION INTERFERENCE because it's mobilizing the Ds.)
Haha!

And sometimes I think I’m cynical.
"Cynical" is an interesting word, because of the DNA it shares with the shift from geocentrism to heliocentrism, etc.

MAGAverse's many seemingly-inexplicable logical failures actually make sense when you consider the Trump-centric worldview; if Trump is always right, then it's everything else that's always wrong.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:02 pm
by Shirley
Maybe I'm not as opposed to republicans shutting the government down, again, as I thought:

RBC Capital Markets:

U.S. equities tend to be turbulent heading into extended government shurdowns, but half the typical damage has already been done since July. U.S. equity markets have tended to rebound meaningfully after the pullbacks associated with extended shutdowns, with 12-month forward gains of 18-19% on an average and median basis.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:20 pm
by jfish26
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:02 pm Maybe I'm not as opposed to republicans shutting the government down, again, as I thought:

RBC Capital Markets:

U.S. equities tend to be turbulent heading into extended government shurdowns, but half the typical damage has already been done since July. U.S. equity markets have tended to rebound meaningfully after the pullbacks associated with extended shutdowns, with 12-month forward gains of 18-19% on an average and median basis.
We've done this silly dance so many times that it's been normalized.

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 1:47 pm
by Shirley
jfish26 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:20 pm
Shirley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:02 pm Maybe I'm not as opposed to republicans shutting the government down, again, as I thought:

RBC Capital Markets:

U.S. equities tend to be turbulent heading into extended government shurdowns, but half the typical damage has already been done since July. U.S. equity markets have tended to rebound meaningfully after the pullbacks associated with extended shutdowns, with 12-month forward gains of 18-19% on an average and median basis.
We've done this silly dance so many times that it's been normalized.
I misspoke. "Republicans" aren't shutting the government down", "congress" is shutting the government down.

My bad

Damn you, liberal MSM!

Re: 2024

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 4:35 pm
by Shirley
In the last few days:

"Jeb Bush got us into the Middle East."

"Joe Biden is going to get us into World War II"

"Windmills are making whales batty."

"I'm up in the polls against Obama."


Trump confused, says Jeb Bush got us into the middle east.