Page 10 of 60

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
by seahawk
Hadn't thought about it until your screeds against this young woman, who I believe has a degree in international relations and economics and graduated cum laude from Boston University. I just realized she had to be admired for her ability to figure out how to get ahead in the somewhat competitive world that is politics.

She was smart enough to know not to cross Nancy Pelosi.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:42 pm
by HouseDivided
Geezer wrote: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:58 pm She's quite an idiot.
FYP

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:14 am
by chiknbut
Absolutely shocking that Psych and Tdub think that a well-educated and successful woman is an "idiot."

Shocking, I tell you!

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:33 am
by seahawk
Republicans seem like the idiots for bothering with her, as it ties them in knots. We don't ever have to take anything Psych says about working class men and women seriously as he's revealed exactly how much he disdains those folks, like "waitresses."

Republicans claim AOC is wrong for saying people are working 2 or 3 jobs, which undercuts their arguments against Obamacare. And watching all those old white male Republicans yesterday, they're idiots for letting millennials know just how much they dislike a Latina woman, even if she's well-educated.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:00 am
by HouseDivided
chiknbut wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:14 am Absolutely shocking that Psych and Tdub think that a well-educated and successful woman is an "idiot."

Shocking, I tell you!
And I, in turn, am shocked at how low you set the bar for "well-educated" and "successful". Apparently, all you require is two x chromosomes and the ability to form words.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:08 am
by Geezer
never mind, pointless...

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:09 am
by TDub
chiknbut wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:14 am Absolutely shocking that Psych and Tdub think that a well-educated and successful woman is an "idiot."

Shocking, I tell you!
Has nothing to do with woman, success, or education. Weve been over this.

You think people who want to live in the wilderness have mental instabilities and that all rock climbers are on the autism spectrum. I'm not too worried about what you think of me, you've obviously got a bit of stereotyping and error in your character judgement.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:57 am
by ousdahl
Was gonna post in the Fox and friends thread, but I’d rather hear you guys’s opinions rather than parrot theirs...so what to think of the case with the Montana mom who wants to use public school vouchers to pay for her kid’s private Christian school?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 8:04 am
by Shirley
ousdahl wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:57 am Was gonna post in the Fox and friends thread, but I’d rather hear you guys’s opinions rather than parrot theirs...so what to think of the case with the Montana mom who wants to use public school vouchers to pay for her kid’s private Christian school?
I started to post about that a couple of hours ago, but it's too depressing. The one thing it isn't, is a surprise. @MoscowMItch knew exactly what he was doing when he stole that seat. Fuck him. Forever.

American tax dollars going to pay for an education built around a convenient comforting fantasy, rather than facts. smfh

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:38 pm
by Deleted User 62
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:00 am
chiknbut wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:14 am Absolutely shocking that Psych and Tdub think that a well-educated and successful woman is an "idiot."

Shocking, I tell you!
And I, in turn, am shocked at how low you set the bar for "well-educated" and "successful". Apparently, all you require is two x chromosomes and the ability to form words.
I can only speak for myself, but having a degree should qualify someone as "well educated".

I also would consider a Congressperson "successful" as well.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:39 pm
by Deleted User 62
ousdahl wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 7:57 am Was gonna post in the Fox and friends thread, but I’d rather hear you guys’s opinions rather than parrot theirs...so what to think of the case with the Montana mom who wants to use public school vouchers to pay for her kid’s private Christian school?
Isn't that exactly what DeVoss wanted?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:56 pm
by HouseDivided
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:38 pm
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:00 am
chiknbut wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:14 am Absolutely shocking that Psych and Tdub think that a well-educated and successful woman is an "idiot."

Shocking, I tell you!
And I, in turn, am shocked at how low you set the bar for "well-educated" and "successful". Apparently, all you require is two x chromosomes and the ability to form words.
I can only speak for myself, but having a degree should qualify someone as "well educated".

I also would consider a Congressperson "successful" as well.
Apparently you have never listened to The Waitress speak in public. I would be shocked if her IQ broached the triple digits.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:59 pm
by seahawk
You've always whined about under appreciated your enormous intellect and talent are. Certainly says something that at such a young age, she has enough smarts to get a lot further than you have in many more years on the planet.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:23 pm
by Deleted User 62
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:56 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:38 pm
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:00 am

And I, in turn, am shocked at how low you set the bar for "well-educated" and "successful". Apparently, all you require is two x chromosomes and the ability to form words.
I can only speak for myself, but having a degree should qualify someone as "well educated".

I also would consider a Congressperson "successful" as well.
Apparently you have never listened to The Waitress speak in public. I would be shocked if her IQ broached the triple digits.
JFC, just go ahead and come out.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:34 pm
by HouseDivided
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:23 pm
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:56 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:38 pm

I can only speak for myself, but having a degree should qualify someone as "well educated".

I also would consider a Congressperson "successful" as well.
Apparently you have never listened to The Waitress speak in public. I would be shocked if her IQ broached the triple digits.
JFC, just go ahead and come out.
I don’t follow. She’s an imbecile, therefore . . . what, exactly?!?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:45 pm
by ousdahl
is she at least prompt about topping off yer coffee?

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:46 pm
by Deleted User 62
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:34 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:23 pm
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:56 pm

Apparently you have never listened to The Waitress speak in public. I would be shocked if her IQ broached the triple digits.
JFC, just go ahead and come out.
I don’t follow. She’s an imbecile, therefore . . . what, exactly?!?
She isn't an imbecile. You know it.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:52 pm
by HouseDivided
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:46 pm
HouseDivided wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:34 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:23 pm

JFC, just go ahead and come out.
I don’t follow. She’s an imbecile, therefore . . . what, exactly?!?
She isn't an imbecile. You know it.
She is very much an imbecile. Of that I am quite certain.

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:53 pm
by HouseDivided
ousdahl wrote: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:45 pm is she at least prompt about topping off yer coffee?
I wouldn't even trust her with something as simple as a coffee order. She's still integrating the amazing fact that vegetables, like, grow out of the ground, y'all!

Re: SCOTUS

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:57 pm
by ousdahl
I bet she also thinks Mericans invented the wheel!