Kansas Crimson

seahawk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:26 am You keep attacking me for being proud of being a KU grad, on a KU forum. Weird.

Actually, I believe he (I think HD is a he) is "attacking" you for continuously falsely accusing people of being racist and misogynists. That and your putting down and discounting people's opinions based on whether or not they attended KU - regarding things that have nothing to do with KU.
Of course I could be wrong.

seahawk wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:47 pm

TDub wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:13 pm Just using the logic you've explicitly laid out for us Sea.

Perhaps you don't remember the lyrics of the Mouse Club song, which had a refrain, M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E Donald Trump, Mickey Mouse, Donald Trump. Or something like that.

Y'know. Ive been respectful in my posts to you. Ive been honest in my answers to your questions. Ive asked direct questions to you in an attempt to have a discussion. Your responses have been nothing but insults and silliness like above. Not once have you attempted to answer the questions or have an actual discussion. Why other posters here rush to defend you when someone calls out your antics is beyond me. But whatever, i think im done conversing with you. Congratulations you win?

lobster wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:35 pmShe used logic?

Oh, the irony.

youtube, logic, tomato tomahto.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:27 am You're a Texas fan anyway. I grew up a Jayhawk fan. Didn't need to get accepted into my 2nd choice of school for my love to start.

Unlike a child of privilege like you, I'm a firster, who had to figure out where to go on my own and what my family could afford. I could have gone to UT, but chose KU. Had some scholarship thing from KState, but chose KU.

Do the voices in your head tell you stuff like, I'm a Texas fan?

Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:37 am

seahawk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:26 am You keep attacking me for being proud of being a KU grad, on a KU forum. Weird.

Actually, I believe he (I think HD is a he) is "attacking" you for continuously falsely accusing people of being racist and misogynists. That and your putting down and discounting people's opinions based on whether or not they attended KU - regarding things that have nothing to do with KU.
Of course I could be wrong.

No, you would be absolutely correct.

seahawk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:33 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:27 am You're a Texas fan anyway. I grew up a Jayhawk fan. Didn't need to get accepted into my 2nd choice of school for my love to start.

Unlike a child of privilege like you, I'm a firster, who had to figure out where to go on my own and what my family could afford. I could have gone to UT, but chose KU. Had some scholarship thing from KState, but chose KU.

Do the voices in your head tell you stuff like, I'm a Texas fan?

You applied to KState? Gross.

Makes sense though.

What weird trolling. As I said, unlike you, I didn't have parents or relatives who were alums of any college, so a high school teacher suggested that as I had the grades and test scores that I apply for a scholarship and I did, but still chose KU. Unlike you, who claim to have been a longtime KU fan but went somewhere else.

Why exactly am I being trolled on a KU forum for having attended KU?

Psych, it's pretty obvious to everyone that you're a virulent racist and a malignant misogynist who won't even call women by their actual names. Living far away, I'm maybe more aware than most that people look at online forums and as I never found KU students or alums to be as viciously racist or sexist as you, I point out that you didn't attend our alma mater, you're just someone who obsessively trolls the KU forums and spews out your poisonous opinions.

For a couple of years, I actually paid to read The Slant to follow football without your and Illy's toxic input.

Speak for yourself -- Psych is not a racist or misogynist.

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:35 pm Speak for yourself -- Psych is not a racist or misogynist.

you have any reason to believe that?

Geezer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:37 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:35 pm Speak for yourself -- Psych is not a racist or misogynist.

you have any reason to believe that?

If he's ever posted anything racist or misogynistic, please call it to my attention.

It’s 2020. If you don’t like somebody. Or if you disagree with someone. You just accuse them of being racist.

It’s the fallback.

Please excuse my attempt to get back on topic, but this is kind of interesting. One more female politician that Bernie Sanders has found the need to try and damage her career. I don't even like AOC and have to say, "You go, Girl."

AOC’S SPEECH SNUB, ICE REMARKS RANKLE BERNIE SANDERS CAMPAIGN

Ocasio-Cortez has undeniably been a boon to the Sanders campaign—she endorsed him in October, as he recovered from his heart attack, which was crucial to him regaining his momentum. But Ocasio-Cortez’s star power and independence make her a wild card. In Iowa, while AOC didn’t exactly go rogue, her performance stoked some tensions between herself and the Sanders campaign.

Following Ocasio-Cortez’s three-day stint, Sanders’s campaign manager, Faiz Shakir, texted AOC’s campaign manager to express his dissatisfaction with aspects of her performance, according to a source familiar with the exchange. Specifically, the Sanders campaign was miffed that Ocasio-Cortez didn’t mention Sanders by name when she closed out a campaign event at the University of Iowa on a Friday night at the end of last month—a fact that Fox News picked up on. (The Sanders campaign noted that this was one of the first campaign events Ocasio-Cortez did without Sanders, who she typically would introduce at the end of her remarks but he was in Washington, D.C. for the impeachment trial. Any reminder to mention the Senator was “good natured ribbing,” according to the campaign.)

snip

But Ocasio-Cortez’s value to the Sanders campaign is undeniable. “No one can deny the bounce that AOC gave to Bernie’s campaign when she decided to endorse him. And since she decided to endorse him, she has been out there multiple times—in Iowa, in New Hampshire—and just validating him in a way that has been enormously helpful to the Sanders campaign,” Rebecca Katz, a progressive Democratic strategist, told me. “I think she has done tremendous work for him.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/02 ... paign-iowa

Yeah. You go girl!

Really pretty fascinating how these two decrepit old guys, Trump and Sanders are trying to use Ocasio-Cortez for their own purposes. Trump wants to gain the votes of misogynists who think she's too young and pretty, by making her the face of the Democratic Party, as we've seen on this thread.

Bernie wants her around to pretend that he can appeal to young people and to act as if he isn't the very ill, very frail old man who should have withdrawn from the campaign when he had his heart attack.

Mostly seems to contrast how sick looking both men are.

Dudes like hot chicks. Nothing fascinating about that.

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:42 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:37 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:35 pm Speak for yourself -- Psych is not a racist or misogynist.

you have any reason to believe that?

If he's ever posted anything racist or misogynistic, please call it to my attention.

you serious, clark?

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:35 pm Speak for yourself -- Psych is not a racist or misogynist.

She's been saying that for fifteen years now. Anyone who disagrees with her is racist and misogynist. Let it go. I have.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 2:02 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2020 12:35 pm Speak for yourself -- Psych is not a racist or misogynist.

She's been saying that for fifteen years now. Anyone who disagrees with her is racist and misogynist. Let it go. I have.

Anyone who has been reading Psych's racist and misogynistic posts for 15 years would be lying if they pretended they didn't agree with seahawk.