Kansas Crimson

But between doing nothing, seizing guns, or offering ways for people to find some spirituality... lol

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:37 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:32 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:28 am He's saying guns do not commit violence on their own. But the mental health of this country needs repaired. A problem that nobody has found a good easy solution to, but the left is using as am excuse to begin disarming the people

You don’t need to tell me what he’s saying, it’s right there on video and in his tweet. He believes in institutionalizing mentally ill people. And, as a bonus, to not just medicate them, but to use faith-based programs. Which of course the government has no fucking business doing!

Is it a perfect solution? No. I'm not religious, but faith has saved a lot of people. Something to believe in is a good thing. I think he's trying to address the root of an issue, and offer positive influences. Instead of celebrating and promoting mental illness and letting it take deeper root in our society

Positive influences like locking Jack up because he wants to be called Jill.

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:38 am But between doing nothing, seizing guns, or offering ways for people to find some spirituality... lol

Lies as usual.

No one on the left wants to do nothing. That’s your side’s deal; it’s never the right time to talk about guns.

No one serious on the left wants to “seize guns” either. But of course it’s very important that that straw man stay out there for ya.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:38 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:37 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:32 am

You don’t need to tell me what he’s saying, it’s right there on video and in his tweet. He believes in institutionalizing mentally ill people. And, as a bonus, to not just medicate them, but to use faith-based programs. Which of course the government has no fucking business doing!

Is it a perfect solution? No. I'm not religious, but faith has saved a lot of people. Something to believe in is a good thing. I think he's trying to address the root of an issue, and offer positive influences. Instead of celebrating and promoting mental illness and letting it take deeper root in our society

Positive influences like locking Jack up because he wants to be called Jill.

That was never said.

Did it need to be?

He considers trans people mentally ill.

He is in favor of forced institutionalization of mentally ill people.

It’s not hard to pick up what he’s laying down. Particularly when he attaches faith-based approaches to the “institutionalize the mentally ill” plan.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 9:31 am He did every single one of those things. Do we need to go through them one by one?

Trump said don't believe your eyes and ears, only believe what I tell you, and rando swallowed it.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 7:45 pm

japhy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 5:15 pm For the numbers; Tuckie and trump love them some numbers. Expect a comparison of apples and oranges in a few days to show that Tuckie/Elon had higher ratings than Fox.

Looks like Randy’s your huckleberry.

This was the single most predictable outcome of last night. trump and Tucker don't really care if anyone watched them slobber on each other's knobs, it was all about numbers that they could post on the internet the next day for VINDICATION! In the meantime they knew the rubes were going to lap that slop up because they are VINDICATED when their Emperor God is VINDICATED!

For a bunch that likes to say they are not sheeple, they do spend a lot of time trying to convince everyone else that they are part of a vast number of followers. One of many many ironies in their belief system.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:48 am Did it need to be?

He considers trans people mentally ill.

He is in favor of forced institutionalization of mentally ill people.

It’s not hard to pick up what he’s laying down. Particularly when he attaches faith-based approaches to the “institutionalize the mentally ill” plan.

It's easy for you to assume dumb shit. You've mastered the act. Did vivek say he was gonna go door to door locking up anyone deemed mentally ill? No.

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:54 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:48 am Did it need to be?

He considers trans people mentally ill.

He is in favor of forced institutionalization of mentally ill people.

It’s not hard to pick up what he’s laying down. Particularly when he attaches faith-based approaches to the “institutionalize the mentally ill” plan.

It's easy for you to assume dumb shit. You've mastered the act. Did vivek say he was gonna go door to door locking up anyone deemed mentally ill? No.

But think about what you’re saying.

In the most charitable possible interpretation of what Vivek said out loud, he is letting people who want trans people locked up think he’s their guy.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:57 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:54 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:48 am Did it need to be?

He considers trans people mentally ill.

He is in favor of forced institutionalization of mentally ill people.

It’s not hard to pick up what he’s laying down. Particularly when he attaches faith-based approaches to the “institutionalize the mentally ill” plan.

It's easy for you to assume dumb shit. You've mastered the act. Did vivek say he was gonna go door to door locking up anyone deemed mentally ill? No.

But think about what you’re saying.

In the most charitable possible interpretation of what Vivek said out loud, he is letting people who want trans people locked up think he’s their guy.

I've never heard a single person before say anything about locking trans people up. This is your delusion. If someone wants to be trans, go be trans. Just don't demand people play along with your delusional. They are going to still recognize your original gender

Just keep your ideas away from our kids. That's all anyone wants. Stop pushing weird propaganda on children who are still trying to develop and learn about the world. Don't confuse kids who otherwise wouldn't be

quite the boogie man

get help

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:02 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:57 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:54 am

It's easy for you to assume dumb shit. You've mastered the act. Did vivek say he was gonna go door to door locking up anyone deemed mentally ill? No.

But think about what you’re saying.

In the most charitable possible interpretation of what Vivek said out loud, he is letting people who want trans people locked up think he’s their guy.

I've never heard a single person before say anything about locking trans people up. This is your delusion. If someone wants to be trans, go be trans. Just don't demand people play along with your delusional. They are going to still recognize your original gender

Just keep your ideas away from our kids. That's all anyone wants. Stop pushing weird propaganda on children who are still trying to develop and learn about the world. Don't confuse kids who otherwise wouldn't be

Again, the MOST charitable way to interpret the words Vivek said out loud in his job interview is that he is open to institutionalizing trans people.

Maybe that’s not how he actually feels. But if one wanted to hear it, one could hear it. And he knows that - he is CLEARLY an excellent orator. He does not get to hide behind any sort of ambiguity.

He is courting the same scum that Trump courted. On this issue and so many others. The fact that he’s a little more Model UN Try-Hard about it doesn’t make it better; in a way it makes it much scarier.

you hear what you want to hear.

Once Vivek gets to that 25% mark, Trump will VP him, and with Trumps (alleged) 75%....there is no point in even having an election.

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:14 am you hear what you want to hear.

We all do. That’s the point.

And not by accident, Vivek lets people who want to hear “let’s lock up the trannies” hear that he’d lock up the trannies.

And again that’s the MOST benign explanation.

Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:16 am Once Vivek gets to that 25% mark, Trump will VP him, and with Trumps (alleged) 75%....there is no point in even having an election.

I think Vivek’s strategy is to spend the first part of the cycle getting in Trump’s good graces (so as to get the VP slot), and then be there to step into the big chair if, one way or the other, Trump is forced off the board.

if you don’t recognize dog whistles, there’s a pretty good chance you’re their target

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:20 am

Overlander wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:16 am Once Vivek gets to that 25% mark, Trump will VP him, and with Trumps (alleged) 75%....there is no point in even having an election.

I think Vivek’s strategy is to spend the first part of the cycle getting in Trump’s good graces (so as to get the VP slot), and then be there to step into the big chair if, one way or the other, Trump is forced off the board.

I think that could be said of anyone not named Chris or Asa.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:08 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:02 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 10:57 am

But think about what you’re saying.

In the most charitable possible interpretation of what Vivek said out loud, he is letting people who want trans people locked up think he’s their guy.

I've never heard a single person before say anything about locking trans people up. This is your delusion. If someone wants to be trans, go be trans. Just don't demand people play along with your delusional. They are going to still recognize your original gender

Just keep your ideas away from our kids. That's all anyone wants. Stop pushing weird propaganda on children who are still trying to develop and learn about the world. Don't confuse kids who otherwise wouldn't be

Again, the MOST charitable way to interpret the words Vivek said out loud in his job interview is that he is open to institutionalizing trans people.

Maybe that’s not how he actually feels. But if one wanted to hear it, one could hear it. And he knows that - he is CLEARLY an excellent orator. He does not get to hide behind any sort of ambiguity.

He is courting the same scum that Trump courted. On this issue and so many others. The fact that he’s a little more Model UN Try-Hard about it doesn’t make it better; in a way it makes it much scarier.

Did he even mention trans people??? Lol

The question was about gun violence

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:18 am

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:14 am you hear what you want to hear.

We all do. That’s the point.

And not by accident, Vivek lets people who want to hear “let’s lock up the trannies” hear that he’d lock up the trannies.

And again that’s the MOST benign explanation.

You might be the only person on the planet that got that out of a question about gun violence where no mention of trans people was in either the question or response