Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2023 1:28 pm
Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:50 pmIt is?
[/https://www.aclu.org/documents/human-tr ... ted-states
Page 10 of 19
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2023 1:41 pm
Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:50 pmIt is?
https://wisevoter.com/state-rankings/hu ... -by-state/
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2023 10:29 pm
dolomite wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 1:41 pmDidn’t need a synopsis of what human trafficking is, I am former law enforcement.Overlander wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:50 pmIt is?
https://wisevoter.com/state-rankings/hu ... -by-state/
I do appreciate you providing “documentation” that it definitely is more prevalent in GOP controlled populace though.
I guess prayer and guns have not had much of an impact?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 11:19 am
I seriously doubt if the GOP has a monopoly on sexual slavery.
Everyone should realize there isn’t a treatment (even prayer) that cures pedophilia.
Everyone should realize there isn’t a treatment (even prayer) that cures pedophilia.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2023 11:23 am
I agree 100%. So isn't the Sound of Freedom-related talking point - that any criticism of how the movie is being used sounds in PRO CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING - just a distraction?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2023 6:26 pm
This go here?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2023 8:46 pm
lol
(except it’s sad, not funny)
(except it’s sad, not funny)
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:38 am
Sorry, haters:
Anheuser Busch InBev ABI +2.90% on Thursday reported second-quarter earnings that beat expectations, despite taking a significant hit to its U.S. sales as some drinkers boycotted its Bud Light beer brand.
AB InBev (ticker: BUD) reported underlying earnings of 72 cents a share for the quarter to the end of June, on revenue of $15.12 billion.
Analysts had expected AB InBev to earn 68 cents a share on revenue of $15.38 billion.
Revenue was up 7.2%...
Anheuser Busch InBev ABI +2.90% on Thursday reported second-quarter earnings that beat expectations, despite taking a significant hit to its U.S. sales as some drinkers boycotted its Bud Light beer brand.
AB InBev (ticker: BUD) reported underlying earnings of 72 cents a share for the quarter to the end of June, on revenue of $15.12 billion.
Analysts had expected AB InBev to earn 68 cents a share on revenue of $15.38 billion.
Revenue was up 7.2%...
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 8:56 am
What’s the rube explanation for this going to be?
Bad apple?
Politicized law enforcement?
Free speech?
Fake news?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:01 am
Fish thinks this is some big own but it really takes nothing away from the movie
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:02 am
Just brings up a lot of weird questions. How closely was this guy connected to the movie? One of a group of people funding is the closest I could connect him. Not like he was closely tied to it. But why was he helping fund this movie while being a weirdo at the same time?
Was it just an investment?
Guilty conscious?
Was he trying to throw people off his trail?
Make it make sense lol
Was it just an investment?
Guilty conscious?
Was he trying to throw people off his trail?
Make it make sense lol
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:06 am
Nothing related to pedos makes sense.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:02 am Just brings up a lot of weird questions. How closely was this guy connected to the movie? One of a group of people funding is the closest I could connect him. Not like he was closely tied to it. But why was he helping fund this movie while being a weirdo at the same time?
Was it just an investment?
Guilty conscious?
Was he trying to throw people off his trail?
Make it make sense lol
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:10 am
You have tried to tell us that anyone who says anything negative about this movie is pro child sex trafficking. I and others here have pointed out that there are serious issues with the movie - who is behind it and why, and what people on the right are using it for, and what can and does happen in real life because of fear porn like this.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:02 am Just brings up a lot of weird questions. How closely was this guy connected to the movie? One of a group of people funding is the closest I could connect him. Not like he was closely tied to it. But why was he helping fund this movie while being a weirdo at the same time?
Was it just an investment?
Guilty conscious?
Was he trying to throw people off his trail?
Make it make sense lol
This piece of data suggests those concerns we have raised - which you have repeatedly minimized and deflected - are quite warranted. I would be surprised if this is the only wart on the movie’s ass.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:56 am
No it doesn't. You're just searching for validation.jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:10 amYou have tried to tell us that anyone who says anything negative about this movie is pro child sex trafficking. I and others here have pointed out that there are serious issues with the movie - who is behind it and why, and what people on the right are using it for, and what can and does happen in real life because of fear porn like this.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:02 am Just brings up a lot of weird questions. How closely was this guy connected to the movie? One of a group of people funding is the closest I could connect him. Not like he was closely tied to it. But why was he helping fund this movie while being a weirdo at the same time?
Was it just an investment?
Guilty conscious?
Was he trying to throw people off his trail?
Make it make sense lol
This piece of data suggests those concerns we have raised - which you have repeatedly minimized and deflected - are quite warranted. I would be surprised if this is the only wart on the movie’s ass.
The movie isn't even the point. The point is the left pretends to care about so many issues, yet child sex trafficking is never one. They almost take the opposite approach of trying to hide the issue and normalize grooming children
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:01 am
you sure it isn’t the deep state?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 11:16 am
I don’t need validation. But following the money is often a good place to unpack motivations. And yes, it does matter if people financing and promoting this fear porn project are themselves abusers.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:56 amNo it doesn't. You're just searching for validation.jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 10:10 amYou have tried to tell us that anyone who says anything negative about this movie is pro child sex trafficking. I and others here have pointed out that there are serious issues with the movie - who is behind it and why, and what people on the right are using it for, and what can and does happen in real life because of fear porn like this.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 9:02 am Just brings up a lot of weird questions. How closely was this guy connected to the movie? One of a group of people funding is the closest I could connect him. Not like he was closely tied to it. But why was he helping fund this movie while being a weirdo at the same time?
Was it just an investment?
Guilty conscious?
Was he trying to throw people off his trail?
Make it make sense lol
This piece of data suggests those concerns we have raised - which you have repeatedly minimized and deflected - are quite warranted. I would be surprised if this is the only wart on the movie’s ass.
The movie isn't even the point. The point is the left pretends to care about so many issues, yet child sex trafficking is never one. They almost take the opposite approach of trying to hide the issue and normalize grooming children
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:04 pm
You clearly need validation jfish. You commented in a separate thread begging me to check this thread and look at your post. Lol
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:06 pm
And you realize that movie got funding from a lot of sources right? Not like this one guy played a huge role in it. Hollywood refused to make forward with the movie if that tells you enough. Hollywood is rumored to be a huge pedo ring. Ask any former child actor
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:20 pm
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:23 pm
I would encourage you to actually read the primary source material.randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:06 pm And you realize that movie got funding from a lot of sources right? Not like this one guy played a huge role in it. Hollywood refused to make forward with the movie if that tells you enough. Hollywood is rumored to be a huge pedo ring. Ask any former child actor
This guy - who is an established, comfortably-public promoter of "Sugar Daddy/Sugar Baby" parties - involved himself quite intentionally. In the MOST charitable read of things, the producers failed to do even basic due diligence as to where this money was coming from.
Is it possible that this guy was a one-off, and that no one else involved had intentions and motivations anything less than pure?
Sure, it's possible.
But life experience - and basic reasoning, given the other folks involved - tells me that's highly unlikely.