Kansas Crimson

Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:32 pm I forgot how nice it was not to have you two pro-insurrectionists around here today.

And as far as the scientists changing their opinions and recommendations, Randy...

Could you reveal your ignorance any more blatantly? It was called the "Novel" Corona Virus for a reason, because nobody had seen this iteration of it before. It was NEW. Medicine is always, always, ALWAYS, even after a disease or condition has been known for 50 or 100, or 500 years, our current best guess, because that's what science is, you pitiful moron.

Here's a Pro tip for you: Scientists will still be changing their opinions about the Covid-19 virus 100 years from now as they continue to learn more about it. When they do, will that be yet another reason for you to take yet another victory lap, dumbass?

If you weren't so ignorant on the subject, if you knew enough to realize how little you know, you'd shut your stupid mouth, and stop embarrassing yourself.

But you don't, so you won't. Instead, you'll keep spreading your ignorant opinions on the subject around here, like the feces they are.

MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:56 pm don’t spoil the hissyfit. they are all notzies. They say so.

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:00 pm

Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:32 pm I forgot how nice it was not to have you two pro-insurrectionists around here today.

And as far as the scientists changing their opinions and recommendations, Randy...

Could you reveal your ignorance any more blatantly? It was called the "Novel" Corona Virus for a reason, because nobody had seen this iteration of it before. It was NEW. Medicine is always, always, ALWAYS, even after a disease or condition has been known for 50 or 100, or 500 years, our current best guess, because that's what science is, you pitiful moron.

Here's a Pro tip for you: Scientists will still be changing their opinions about the Covid-19 virus 100 years from now as they continue to learn more about it. When they do, will that be yet another reason for you to take yet another victory lap, dumbass?

If you weren't so ignorant on the subject, if you knew enough to realize how little you know, you'd shut your stupid mouth, and stop embarrassing yourself.

But you don't, so you won't. Instead, you'll keep spreading your ignorant opinions on the subject around here, like the feces they are.

I agree with most of this. That's why the scientific process should have been allowed throughout covid, because it was new.

Instead faucci and the biden admin tried to censor and silence other scientists who had conflicting opinions and studies. Why??? That isn't the scientific way.

At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:08 pm

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:00 pm

Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:32 pm I forgot how nice it was not to have you two pro-insurrectionists around here today.

And as far as the scientists changing their opinions and recommendations, Randy...

Could you reveal your ignorance any more blatantly? It was called the "Novel" Corona Virus for a reason, because nobody had seen this iteration of it before. It was NEW. Medicine is always, always, ALWAYS, even after a disease or condition has been known for 50 or 100, or 500 years, our current best guess, because that's what science is, you pitiful moron.

Here's a Pro tip for you: Scientists will still be changing their opinions about the Covid-19 virus 100 years from now as they continue to learn more about it. When they do, will that be yet another reason for you to take yet another victory lap, dumbass?

If you weren't so ignorant on the subject, if you knew enough to realize how little you know, you'd shut your stupid mouth, and stop embarrassing yourself.

But you don't, so you won't. Instead, you'll keep spreading your ignorant opinions on the subject around here, like the feces they are.

I agree with most of this. That's why the scientific process should have been allowed throughout covid, because it was new.

Instead faucci and the biden admin tried to censor and silence other scientists who had conflicting opinions and studies. Why??? That isn't the scientific way.

At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual

I have a question.
What were you doing those years you should have been in the 11th and 12th grade?

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:12 pm

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:08 pm

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:00 pm

I agree with most of this. That's why the scientific process should have been allowed throughout covid, because it was new.

Instead faucci and the biden admin tried to censor and silence other scientists who had conflicting opinions and studies. Why??? That isn't the scientific way.

At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual

I have a question.
What were you doing those years you should have been in the 11th and 12th grade?

I'm sorry I wasn't there for you when you needed a stepdad

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:53 pm

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:37 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:01 pm

This is tinfoil hat conspiracy material. This isn't an oligarchy. Trump was a democratically elected president who won the electorate, the popular, and every single swing state.

Musk did not give a nazi salute, nor say a single word related to anything resembling that in any way. Here is an example of what an actual nazi salute looks like, and video of musk. His words were "my heart goes out to you" as he puts his open palm over his heart and motions to the crowd.

Hi Mr. "I was right".
What are the guys in the video on the left doing?

Idk they must be doing the kamala



Or maybe none of them are nazis? Cause ummmm that ended 80 years ago on a different continent and isn't coming back. That seems most likely

randylahey wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 7:00 pm

Shirley wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 6:32 pm I forgot how nice it was not to have you two pro-insurrectionists around here today.

And as far as the scientists changing their opinions and recommendations, Randy...

Could you reveal your ignorance any more blatantly? It was called the "Novel" Corona Virus for a reason, because nobody had seen this iteration of it before. It was NEW. Medicine is always, always, ALWAYS, even after a disease or condition has been known for 50 or 100, or 500 years, our current best guess, because that's what science is, you pitiful moron.

Here's a Pro tip for you: Scientists will still be changing their opinions about the Covid-19 virus 100 years from now as they continue to learn more about it. When they do, will that be yet another reason for you to take yet another victory lap, dumbass?

If you weren't so ignorant on the subject, if you knew enough to realize how little you know, you'd shut your stupid mouth, and stop embarrassing yourself.

But you don't, so you won't. Instead, you'll keep spreading your ignorant opinions on the subject around here, like the feces they are.

I agree with most of this. That's why the scientific process should have been allowed throughout covid, because it was new.

Instead faucci and the biden admin tried to censor and silence other scientists who had conflicting opinions and studies. Why??? That isn't the scientific way.

At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 5:33 am It’s gonna be another misleading half-truth.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:30 am That is not responsive to what Shirley asked.

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:39 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:30 am That is not responsive to what Shirley asked.

Right.
BOTH Shirley and randy aren't on the same page here.
Coincidently, I just posted a response to randy in regards to another subject in which I said he and someone else weren't accepting that they are both right. I think (know?) that seems to apply here too.

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:39 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:30 am That is not responsive to what Shirley asked.

Right.
BOTH Shirley and randy aren't on the same page here.
Coincidently, I just posted a response to randy in regards to another subject in which I said he and someone else weren't accepting that they are both right. I think (know?) that seems to apply here too.

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:20 am Is it worth revisiting the covid argument? Pdub giving me another "time out" for replying to other posters?

Zuckerberg has already come forward saying Facebook was pressured by the biden admin and government agencies to censor and remove truthful information related to covid, covid origins, and vaccine information. Zuckerberg said Facebook caved to the intimidation tactics and he wishes they hadn't. Musk reported the same thing going on at Twitter, which he didn't own yet, but the emails still existed when he bought it

There's been numerous books written and documentaries made detailing a lot of this.

Surely you remember the "safe and effective" campaign during the vaccine rollout?
Surely you remember the mandates and tactics used to coerce individuals and companies to vaccinate? It was GOOD that treatments were available to those that sought it, but most people didn't need them, because immune systems.

Surely you remember people losing their jobs for being skeptical of the vaccine and wanting to wait?
Surely you remember the massive settlements lots of people got for being wrongly terminated?

The vaccine had zero long term studies, and what surprises some people, no studies done (early phases) on whether it stopped transmission. The studies focused on if it would increase protection for infected individuals. But that isn't how it was marketed. I'm sure you remember all the biden and vaccine speeches

Randy wrote:At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual.

Shirley wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 9:26 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2025 6:20 am Is it worth revisiting the covid argument? Pdub giving me another "time out" for replying to other posters?

Zuckerberg has already come forward saying Facebook was pressured by the biden admin and government agencies to censor and remove truthful information related to covid, covid origins, and vaccine information. Zuckerberg said Facebook caved to the intimidation tactics and he wishes they hadn't. Musk reported the same thing going on at Twitter, which he didn't own yet, but the emails still existed when he bought it

There's been numerous books written and documentaries made detailing a lot of this.

Surely you remember the "safe and effective" campaign during the vaccine rollout?
Surely you remember the mandates and tactics used to coerce individuals and companies to vaccinate? It was GOOD that treatments were available to those that sought it, but most people didn't need them, because immune systems.

Surely you remember people losing their jobs for being skeptical of the vaccine and wanting to wait?
Surely you remember the massive settlements lots of people got for being wrongly terminated?

The vaccine had zero long term studies, and what surprises some people, no studies done (early phases) on whether it stopped transmission. The studies focused on if it would increase protection for infected individuals. But that isn't how it was marketed. I'm sure you remember all the biden and vaccine speeches

Randy wrote:At one point if someone said you could have side effects from the vaccine, or you could be vaccinated and still get covid, it was flagged as misinformation and censored. Both of those things were factual.

Just like Psych repeatedly berating Harris for her lack of intelligence, and saying she had an IQ score below 100. When I asked him to show us the evidence, instead of proving it, he turned around and said that if I couldn't see it, he questioned my IQ.

You're both full of shit, and don't even care that it's proven here on a regular basis. Where's your self-respect?

You said your charge is "factual". That being the case, show us the "facts".

And that has nothing to do with the "gain of function" bullshit you're peddling to try and weasel out of proving the lie you were promoting yesterday, liar.