A. I didn't quit Twitter nor did I make a statement or say I was making a statement.
B. I never drank Bud Light but if I did, I would like to think I wouldn't be as big of a stupid fuck as MTG is.
A. I didn't quit Twitter nor did I make a statement or say I was making a statement.
You are failing to be distracted. Might need reeducation without CRT.TDub wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:30 pm I dont understand how/why whoever is signed to advertise a product makes any damn difference about the product.
I dont drink bud because it's gross, gives me a headache and its a Missouri beer.....
Coors is the way.....but I couldn't care less who they hired to do an ad for it....wouldn't change my opinion one iota.
the whole thing is weird.....like, who gives a flying fuck either way...makes no sense.
Their tribe of goons grows ever smaller, like a very cold day blew into their wet sand-filled underpants.Feral wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 1:43 pmBecause ringing the "Woke" bell so frequently lead to habituation and an ever-diminishing parasympathetic gush of saliva in the chronically aggrieved about everything cult, so they had to move to a new stimulus/response model in hopes of recapturing the easily fooled.
It appears to have generated the desired, bigoted and hateful, reaction.
Im almost on bored.TDub wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 2:30 pm I dont understand how/why whoever is signed to advertise a product makes any damn difference about the product.
I dont drink bud because it's gross, gives me a headache and its a Missouri beer.....
Coors is the way.....but I couldn't care less who they hired to do an ad for it....wouldn't change my opinion one iota.
the whole thing is weird.....like, who gives a flying fuck either way...makes no sense.
Time out!randylahey wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 3:15 pm
Two of your favorites I know. Elons full disclosure of Twitter and the government is gonna be pretty mind blowing
This is sad that you think its normal/acceptable for government agencies to have access to everythingRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:44 amTime out!randylahey wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 3:15 pm
Two of your favorites I know. Elons full disclosure of Twitter and the government is gonna be pretty mind blowing
It blew Elon's mind that "various government agencies" had full access to everything that was going on at Twitter and people's DMs - and he was not aware of that?
For a smart man he sure is/was clueless.
A. What "is sad" to me is that Elon Musk is seemingly clueless in regards to the company he owns and how/what our government has the ability to do to/with it.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 5:43 amThis is sad that you think its normal/acceptable for government agencies to have access to everythingRainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:44 amTime out!randylahey wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 3:15 pm
Two of your favorites I know. Elons full disclosure of Twitter and the government is gonna be pretty mind blowing
It blew Elon's mind that "various government agencies" had full access to everything that was going on at Twitter and people's DMs - and he was not aware of that?
For a smart man he sure is/was clueless.
I'm not sure what "this information" is that you are referring to.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 5:55 am Since George W Bush signed the Patriot act. Snowden beat you to it randy.
It’s partially why I stay off the social medias.
Not really that shocking. And this is one thing with which I agree with you — no the government should absolutely not be able to access this information, no matter the situation.
Look how Snowden got treated for telling the truth. Exiled by the government.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 5:55 am Since George W Bush signed the Patriot act. Snowden beat you to it randy.
It’s partially why I stay off the social medias.
Not really that shocking. And this is one thing with which I agree with you — no the government should absolutely not be able to access this information, no matter the situation.
Mind blowing like the "Fauci files" were? I remember the rubes rubbing their hands together gleefully awaiting those "mind blowing" files.randylahey wrote: ↑Sun Apr 16, 2023 3:15 pm
Two of your favorites I know. Elons full disclosure of Twitter and the government is gonna be pretty mind blowing
DM's.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 6:56 amI'm not sure what "this information" is that you are referring to.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 5:55 am Since George W Bush signed the Patriot act. Snowden beat you to it randy.
It’s partially why I stay off the social medias.
Not really that shocking. And this is one thing with which I agree with you — no the government should absolutely not be able to access this information, no matter the situation.
Whatever it is, if someone/something is a viable threat to a person, our government, our country, you don't feel that's a worthy "situation" for our government to access the information?
I 100% respect your opinion.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 8:57 amDM's.RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 6:56 amI'm not sure what "this information" is that you are referring to.pdub wrote: ↑Tue Apr 18, 2023 5:55 am Since George W Bush signed the Patriot act. Snowden beat you to it randy.
It’s partially why I stay off the social medias.
Not really that shocking. And this is one thing with which I agree with you — no the government should absolutely not be able to access this information, no matter the situation.
Whatever it is, if someone/something is a viable threat to a person, our government, our country, you don't feel that's a worthy "situation" for our government to access the information?
IP/location/log in time data.
Time on site.
What sites you visit while you're logged onto the app.
And no. I don't.
Not because I don't think they should in those circumstances -- but more of the ability to abuse -- which I feel they most certainly do.
I prefer people's liberties and freedoms ( and I understand the line is murky with social media but I feel now it's very much a fabric of speech ) over security.
It's a risk I accept taking.