Kansas Crimson

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:34 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:28 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:21 pm

I know his story. His criminality isn’t excused by his addiction.

By all accounts, Hunter Biden has broken some laws and it seems that he is on the way to being held accountable for that. I assume that you support criminals being held accountable for their actions when it is proven with real evidence they have committed crimes.

Indeed.

Just as I assume that you believe that it requires EVIDENCE of a crime for a person to be held accountable for said crime.

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:35 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:34 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:28 am
By all accounts, Hunter Biden has broken some laws and it seems that he is on the way to being held accountable for that. I assume that you support criminals being held accountable for their actions when it is proven with real evidence they have committed crimes.

Indeed.

Just as I assume that you believe that it requires EVIDENCE of a crime for a person to be held accountable for said crime.

Yup. It appears that there is ample EVIDENCE of Hunter's monkeyshines with Burisma via emails, texts, and exchange of money. Having said that, after legal games and influence-peddling have done their work, who knows what EVIDENCE will exist?

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 10:00 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:35 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:34 am

Indeed.

Just as I assume that you believe that it requires EVIDENCE of a crime for a person to be held accountable for said crime.

Yup. It appears that there is ample EVIDENCE of Hunter's monkeyshines with Burisma via emails, texts, and exchange of money. Having said that, after legal games and influence-peddling have done their work, who knows what EVIDENCE will exist?

My guess is that your definition of legit evidence and a court of law's definition of legit evidence are a bit different.

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 10:04 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 10:00 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 9:35 am

Just as I assume that you believe that it requires EVIDENCE of a crime for a person to be held accountable for said crime.

Yup. It appears that there is ample EVIDENCE of Hunter's monkeyshines with Burisma via emails, texts, and exchange of money. Having said that, after legal games and influence-peddling have done their work, who knows what EVIDENCE will exist?

My guess is that your definition of legit evidence and a court of law's definition of legit evidence are a bit different.

Agreed. I am not an attorney, nor am I a politician.

If you want answers and solutions, just vote for the answer (I plead the fifth) man. It's just a matter of tapping the "overflow areas" and he will get it "done fast", no word yet as to whether or not Mexico is going to play for it.

Former President Donald Trump revealed an unusual plan to stop wildfires from raging in California.

Trump suggested that the Golden State's rougly 33 million acres of forest should be kept damp while speaking at a California Republicans' convention in Anaheim on Friday.

"They say that there's so much water up north that I want to have the overflow areas go into your forests and dampen your forests, because if you dampen your forests you're not gonna have these forest fires that are burning at levels that nobody's ever seen," Trump said to a cheering crowd.

"All the currently dry canals will be brimming and used to irrigate everything, including your own homes and bathrooms and everything, you're going to be happy, and I'm going to get it done fast," he added.

The former president also took the opportunity to criticize the state for "very poor land management."

Trump has previously falsely claimed that California wildfires were sparked by trees that "explode," and he has long subscribed to the theory that wildfires could be prevented if forests were cleared of dead trees and debris.

In 2018, Trump suggested raking leaves on forest floors could help prevent fires.

So simple minded, why hasn't anyone thought of this before?

is that before or after the raking?

Trump has clearly never been in a forest.

japhy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:23 am If you want answers and solutions, just vote for the answer (I plead the fifth) man. It's just a matter of tapping the "overflow areas" and he will get it "done fast", no word yet as to whether or not Mexico is going to play for it.

Former President Donald Trump revealed an unusual plan to stop wildfires from raging in California.

Trump suggested that the Golden State's rougly 33 million acres of forest should be kept damp while speaking at a California Republicans' convention in Anaheim on Friday.

"They say that there's so much water up north that I want to have the overflow areas go into your forests and dampen your forests, because if you dampen your forests you're not gonna have these forest fires that are burning at levels that nobody's ever seen," Trump said to a cheering crowd.

"All the currently dry canals will be brimming and used to irrigate everything, including your own homes and bathrooms and everything, you're going to be happy, and I'm going to get it done fast," he added.

The former president also took the opportunity to criticize the state for "very poor land management."

Trump has previously falsely claimed that California wildfires were sparked by trees that "explode," and he has long subscribed to the theory that wildfires could be prevented if forests were cleared of dead trees and debris.

In 2018, Trump suggested raking leaves on forest floors could help prevent fires.

So simple minded, why hasn't anyone thought of this before?

He did admit over the weekend that there was never a possibility of making Mexico pay for the wall.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 1:57 pm

japhy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:23 am If you want answers and solutions, just vote for the answer (I plead the fifth) man. It's just a matter of tapping the "overflow areas" and he will get it "done fast", no word yet as to whether or not Mexico is going to play for it.

Former President Donald Trump revealed an unusual plan to stop wildfires from raging in California.

Trump suggested that the Golden State's rougly 33 million acres of forest should be kept damp while speaking at a California Republicans' convention in Anaheim on Friday.

"They say that there's so much water up north that I want to have the overflow areas go into your forests and dampen your forests, because if you dampen your forests you're not gonna have these forest fires that are burning at levels that nobody's ever seen," Trump said to a cheering crowd.

"All the currently dry canals will be brimming and used to irrigate everything, including your own homes and bathrooms and everything, you're going to be happy, and I'm going to get it done fast," he added.

The former president also took the opportunity to criticize the state for "very poor land management."

Trump has previously falsely claimed that California wildfires were sparked by trees that "explode," and he has long subscribed to the theory that wildfires could be prevented if forests were cleared of dead trees and debris.

In 2018, Trump suggested raking leaves on forest floors could help prevent fires.

So simple minded, why hasn't anyone thought of this before?

He did admit over the weekend that there was never a possibility of making Mexico pay for the wall.

He admitted that he lied?

Clinton and G.W. are getting together tonight for a fundraiser in Chicago.
Why? Because despite their political differences, they don't feel the need to be assholes to each other and feel a desire to work together to better the country and the world.
Say what you will about those two, compared to Biden and Trump, I prefer them.

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:23 am Vision

Compare this to the guy that rehashes his enemies list daily. Who rants about water spigots. Who goes off on a tangent about preferring to be electrocuted by an electric car than eaten by a shark.

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 10:49 am

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:23 am Vision

Compare this to the guy that rehashes his enemies list daily. Who rants about water spigots. Who goes off on a tangent about preferring to be electrocuted by an electric car than eaten by a shark.

All you have to do is read Psych's and Randy's posts.

It won't make any more sense, but it provides context.

He hates all the same people they blame, so almost nothing else matters.

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:09 am

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 10:49 am

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:23 am Vision

Compare this to the guy that rehashes his enemies list daily. Who rants about water spigots. Who goes off on a tangent about preferring to be electrocuted by an electric car than eaten by a shark.

He hates all the same people they blame, so almost nothing else matters.

This

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:09 am

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 10:49 am

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 8:23 am Vision

Compare this to the guy that rehashes his enemies list daily. Who rants about water spigots. Who goes off on a tangent about preferring to be electrocuted by an electric car than eaten by a shark.

All you have to do is read Psych's and Randy's posts.

It won't make any more sense, but it provides context.

He hates all the same people they blame, so almost nothing else matters.

You're so duped you don't even know you've been duped. Sad.

over/under at number of “independent” (non-r/D) candidates set at, what, 2.5?

JKLivin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:41 pm

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:09 am

Overlander wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 10:49 am

Compare this to the guy that rehashes his enemies list daily. Who rants about water spigots. Who goes off on a tangent about preferring to be electrocuted by an electric car than eaten by a shark.

All you have to do is read Psych's and Randy's posts.

It won't make any more sense, but it provides context.

He hates all the same people they blame, so almost nothing else matters.

You're so duped you don't even know you've been duped. Sad.

The old duped--I am not duped--you are duped puppet master argument. Made famous by Mango Felonious Monk. And four year olds.

Sparko wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 1:14 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 12:41 pm

Shirley wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:09 am

All you have to do is read Psych's and Randy's posts.

It won't make any more sense, but it provides context.

He hates all the same people they blame, so almost nothing else matters.

You're so duped you don't even know you've been duped. Sad.

The old duped--I am not duped--you are duped puppet master argument. Made famous by Mango Felonious Monk. And four year olds.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to say.

Today In: Definitely not a Christo-Fascist cult:

“Great as (Trump’s) accomplishments are, right now we have the privilege of talking to you, our Father. We know even Trump would agree that your greatness is higher than his.”

("Even Trump would agree..."? So humble, it's humbling.)