Kansas Crimson

You people who insist on tweet-quoting George Conway know how this ends, right?

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:40 pm You people who insist on tweet-quoting George Conway know how this ends, right?

Your implication, that people of opposing views can't find common ground on matters of this import, speaks volumes.

Sad "volumes".

Feral wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 6:15 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:40 pm You people who insist on tweet-quoting George Conway know how this ends, right?

Your implication, that people of opposing views can't find common ground on matters of this import, speaks volumes.

Sad "volumes".

That's not it.

Oh.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/2 ... nce-101832

That is questionable in terms of intent. And it is a tiny detail. It is in no way equivalent to the lies by Trump's attorney today.

Oh.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:40 pm You people who insist on tweet-quoting George Conway know how this ends, right?

The part where this is all about creating a soft (cushy, you might say) landing spot for Kellyanne?

Walter Shaub, former Director of the Office of Government Ethics:

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 3:51 pm The chasm between the two sides in terms of preparedness, seriousness, integrity, professionalism and, quite frankly, intellect is something to see on display. It's like the White House's lawyers are just doing a gussied up version of the House GOP's Fox News bingo.

I'll take "Neither Sekulow, Dershowitz, or Starr had any idea that Rep. Hakeem Jeffries was quoting B.I.G" for $2,000 dollars, Alex:

Democratic House Manager @RepJeffries closes his argument for impeachment evidence by addressing Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow with iconic bars from The Notorious B.I.G.:

"If you don't know, now you know."



#whyarewehere?

jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:02 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:40 pm You people who insist on tweet-quoting George Conway know how this ends, right?

The part where this is all about creating a soft (cushy, you might say) landing spot for Kellyanne?

That's certainly a big part of it.

Stockholm Syndrome, we'll be told.

with any other president, a high-ranking advisor would tout her time working in the administration as "relevant previous experience."

yet with Trump, it's "Stockholm Syndrome."

lulz

Entrance to a courtroom in Moscow in the 1980s, where the kind of "trials" Republicans seem to want were held.

The "show trial" meme is the dumbest one yet.


Cuz...uh...it's bassackwards.

FOIA Lawsuits vs. Lawyer Lawsuits? Same difference, right?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... egal-team/

There's a saying in primary care medicine that I found was true over and over again throughout my career: "If you listen to the patient, they'll tell you what's wrong".

Which is to say, if you take the time to ask the right questions and then listen to your patient's answers, they'll eventually reveal enough clues, i.e., symptoms, that you can figure out what's wrong with them before you ever examine them, draw their blood, x-ray or CAT scan them, etc.

Trump is similar in that, he is so bereft of insight, if you listen, eventually he'll tell you where the bodies are buried:

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 7:44 am

jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2020 5:02 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:40 pm You people who insist on tweet-quoting George Conway know how this ends, right?

The part where this is all about creating a soft (cushy, you might say) landing spot for Kellyanne?

That's certainly a big part of it.

Stockholm Syndrome, we'll be told.

And there's this...

Mjl wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2020 1:32 pm Trump's defense team is outright lying about several things... Is that legal?

How long did they wait before transmitting the articles of impeachment then? Not arguing, just curious.