Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 10:36 am
thanks
(i always forget about vimeo)
(i always forget about vimeo)
Proof not everything you post sucks?
Page 99 of 110
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 1:33 pm
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 1:33 pm
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 1:36 pm
you’ve wounded me deeply
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 1:38 pm
Well, maybe not the best post to say "proof not everything [ insert whomever you intend ] posts sucks" when the subject of the video is about something sucking.
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 1:48 pm
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 1:53 pm
that’s where my mind went
the play on “sucks” went completely over my head, even with the italics
i need to do better
the play on “sucks” went completely over my head, even with the italics
i need to do better
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 2:14 pm
I really enjoyed the Mars Sucks video.
I wish I had thought of it.
I wish I had thought of it.
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 2:22 pm
thinking about this exchange more…
ultimately, on some higher level, the contents of that video are kinda why the other thread even exists
we have this awesome resource, to our knowledge unmatched in the universe, that supports this amazing, complex assemblage of life…
…and we can’t help but continue to shit all over it
and for what?
some arbitrary idea of wealth and/or power? (ideas and statuses that will be gone in a few hundred years “at best”)
ultimately, on some higher level, the contents of that video are kinda why the other thread even exists
we have this awesome resource, to our knowledge unmatched in the universe, that supports this amazing, complex assemblage of life…
…and we can’t help but continue to shit all over it
and for what?
some arbitrary idea of wealth and/or power? (ideas and statuses that will be gone in a few hundred years “at best”)
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2023 3:52 pm
Excellent point, andKUTradition wrote: ↑Thu Apr 27, 2023 2:22 pm thinking about this exchange more…
ultimately, on some higher level, the contents of that video are kinda why the other thread even exists
we have this awesome resource, to our knowledge unmatched in the universe, that supports this amazing, complex assemblage of life…
…and we can’t help but continue to shit all over it
and for what?
some arbitrary idea of wealth and/or power? (ideas and statuses that will be gone in a few hundred years “at best”)
#toosad
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Fri May 05, 2023 10:36 am
looks like the twitter algorithms have subjugated randy again this morning
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Wed May 10, 2023 7:55 am
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Wed May 10, 2023 7:57 am
I dunno if it’s even “critiques of Christian nationalism.”
It was mostly just sharing things Christians say and do on public media.
It was mostly just sharing things Christians say and do on public media.
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Tue May 16, 2023 11:19 am
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Tue May 16, 2023 12:10 pm
“Free speech” does not, I guess, mean what we thought it meant.KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue May 16, 2023 11:19 am so, perhaps not a bastion of free speech…
https://apnews.com/article/twitter-saud ... f540d1a074
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Fri May 19, 2023 8:19 am
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Fri May 19, 2023 8:26 am
Zuck too!
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Tue May 23, 2023 9:17 am
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Tue May 23, 2023 1:45 pm
We always hear these correlations between mental health and social media
But what about like, mental health and Excel and Outlook and such?
But what about like, mental health and Excel and Outlook and such?
Re: Facebook, Google, et al
Posted: Tue May 23, 2023 2:09 pm
what about them?
do they, by their nature, lead users to compare themselves with altered views of reality?
do they employ algorithms to get you to use the software excessively?
do they, by their nature, lead users to compare themselves with altered views of reality?
do they employ algorithms to get you to use the software excessively?