seahawk wrote: ↑Wed Oct 31, 2018 5:40 am
I’ll add to my store of wisdom about women provided by psych over the years.
Teachers are sluts.
All women are whores.
Lots of middle class housewives prostitute themselves for drugs.
From time immemorial, all women are liars.
Coeds are sluts.
Well since some media outlets only cover our educational system when female teachers have sex with their students, it's no wonder that people have that opinion of teachers.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2018 9:08 am
by seahawk
Oh please, twocoach, when there’s a shooting on a school campus anywhere in the country, the media are right on it, sticking microphones in the faces of grieving parents. And giving all kinds of details about dead teachers. /s
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:19 pm
by Deleted User 104
Another good interview where he mops the floor with a feminist.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:29 pm
by defixione
Mopping the floor? More like spilling the mop bucket and not mopping it up.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:44 pm
by HouseDivided
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:29 pm
Mopping the floor? More like spilling the mop bucket and not mopping it up.
I like the fact that he never resorts to the shrill emotionality of his opponents. He just keeps calmly restating his argument. That is a win in and of itself.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:48 pm
by Deleted User 104
Imagine being married to that woman. I feel so sorry for her husband.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:05 pm
by HouseDivided
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:48 pm
Imagine being married to that woman. I feel so sorry for her husband.
Been there; done that; have the scars to prove it.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:56 pm
by seahawk
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:29 pm
Mopping the floor? More like spilling the mop bucket and not mopping it up.
How weird is this guy? We're supposed to feel sorry for poor men because they go to prison. Which then leads to his followers translating that into more men than women get raped, because...prison.
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:29 pm
Mopping the floor? More like spilling the mop bucket and not mopping it up.
I like the fact that he never resorts to the shrill emotionality of his opponents. He just keeps calmly restating his argument. That is a win in and of itself.
He was cold, academic, and detached to the base argument. He never totally answered her questions and his 'argument' was nothing more than rhetoric.
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:29 pm
Mopping the floor? More like spilling the mop bucket and not mopping it up.
I like the fact that he never resorts to the shrill emotionality of his opponents. He just keeps calmly restating his argument. That is a win in and of itself.
He was cold, academic, and unattached to the base argument. He never totally answered her questions and his 'argument' was nothing more than rhetoric.
So naturally Psych and Lobster are sporting wood over him.
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:29 pm
Mopping the floor? More like spilling the mop bucket and not mopping it up.
I like the fact that he never resorts to the shrill emotionality of his opponents. He just keeps calmly restating his argument. That is a win in and of itself.
He was cold, academic, and unattached to the base argument. He never totally answered her questions and his 'argument' was nothing more than rhetoric.
She is arguing to feelings and fairness; he is arguing to logic and reason. He refused to be drawn into her specious arguments. Debate 101.
I like the fact that he never resorts to the shrill emotionality of his opponents. He just keeps calmly restating his argument. That is a win in and of itself.
He was cold, academic, and unattached to the base argument. He never totally answered her questions and his 'argument' was nothing more than rhetoric.
She is arguing to feelings and fairness; he is arguing to logic and reason. He refused to be drawn into her specious arguments. Debate 101.
But arguing for logic and reason makes you "cold and academic."
He was cold, academic, and unattached to the base argument. He never totally answered her questions and his 'argument' was nothing more than rhetoric.
She is arguing to feelings and fairness; he is arguing to logic and reason. He refused to be drawn into her specious arguments. Debate 101.
But arguing for logic and reason makes you "cold and academic."
I would take that as a compliment any day of the week.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 4:40 pm
by defixione
His argument was no more substantiated than hers.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:02 pm
by HouseDivided
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 4:40 pm
His argument was no more substantiated than hers.
He did well given the hysterical dreck he was countering. She is obviously no MENSA candidate.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:29 pm
by defixione
Well of course. She was perfect for this GQ video, right down to the 'shrill.' They pedal cosmetic masculinity. They'd loose their audience if they tried to cultivate empathy or compassion for women.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:33 pm
by HouseDivided
defixione wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:29 pm
Well of course. She was perfect for this GQ video, right down to the 'shrill.' They pedal cosmetic masculinity. They'd loose their audience if they tried to cultivate empathy or compassion for women.
Et tu, Brute?
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:01 pm
by chiknbut
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:19 pm
Another good interview where he mops the floor with a feminist.
I just watched this and, other than wondering when this woman acted "shrill," completely understand why Psych and Lobster love this guy. He's condescending, constantly interrupts and shows little respect to a person who eloquently states her points.
Question for Lobster - what is it about this woman that would make you think that she would be a terrible spouse?
lobster wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:19 pm
Another good interview where he mops the floor with a feminist.
I just watched this and, other than wondering when this woman acted "shrill," completely understand why Psych and Lobster love this guy. He's condescending, constantly interrupts and shows little respect to a person who eloquently states her points.
Question for Lobster - what is it about this woman that would make you think that she would be a terrible spouse?
She's a feminist.
Re: Jordan Peterson stuff
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:39 pm
by seahawk
Oh sure, they were women who saved a man's life, but were they feminists?
Women Help Save Man Who Had A Heart Attack At DC Polling Place
They called 911 and were instructed to start CPR, which they traded off performing for several minutes. They also used an automated external defibrillator on the man before first responders arrived.