Kansas Crimson

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:36 pm Our incompetent government pulled off the most competent cover-up of all time. Weird!

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:27 am the day it happened, I remember watching the towers fall in real time and thinking, man that's not how I would have imagined a building that got hit by an airplane would fall.

but yeah, I stop short of full blown conspiracy.

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:26 pm Also, why is it you think all that steel that remained was shipped and sold to China and India immediately after the attacks? They wanted the evidence gone asap.

pdub wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:43 pm What you are saying is not impossible lobster.
I just think it's very improbable.
About the same chances that Lightfoot makes the most 3 pointers for our team next season.

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:45 pm

pdub wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:43 pm What you are saying is not impossible lobster.
I just think it's very improbable.
About the same chances that Lightfoot makes the most 3 pointers for our team next season.

Ha! But he did make one of them last year. I appreciate that you keep an open mind, even if you don't agree. Just remember though, Iran Contra was also a conspiracy until it wasn't. People should not accept authority and should look to science and facts instead.

pdub wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:48 pm "science and facts"

Well...are you reading the counter evidence that some of these posters are bringing to you?

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:26 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:27 am the day it happened, I remember watching the towers fall in real time and thinking, man that's not how I would have imagined a building that got hit by an airplane would fall.

but yeah, I stop short of full blown conspiracy.

The conspiracy part is with the idiots that think planes did not hit the towers and pentagon, or that missiles were used. Thermite might also be untrue as well. The twin towers might have fallen due to the plane damage alone, but there were explosives inside the buildings. Tower 7 on the other hand, could not have fallen the way it did due to fires on one side of it. Impossible. Thousands of scientists and physicists confirm it.

What was true was that there were additional explosives in the towers. There were several vans carrying huge amounts of TNT that were stopped by the police / FBI. You never heard much about it afterwards because it didn't fit the narrative.

Also, why is it you think all that steel that remained was shipped and sold to China and India immediately after the attacks? They wanted the evidence gone asap.

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:55 pm

pdub wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:48 pm "science and facts"

Well...are you reading the counter evidence that some of these posters are bringing to you?

I've already read all their evidence. NIST is a government source, so it's obvious why they have a different explanation. No one in this thread has even made a comment as to why the 911 report did not mention WTC7 at all. The fact of the matter is, lots of people on here just don't know enough about it. If your sources all come from the mainstream media and the government, of course you're going to believe what they told you.

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:59 pm If there was a peer-reviewed report that weapons of mass destruction were real, would you believe it too?

Paul1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:06 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:26 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:27 am the day it happened, I remember watching the towers fall in real time and thinking, man that's not how I would have imagined a building that got hit by an airplane would fall.

but yeah, I stop short of full blown conspiracy.

The conspiracy part is with the idiots that think planes did not hit the towers and pentagon, or that missiles were used. Thermite might also be untrue as well. The twin towers might have fallen due to the plane damage alone, but there were explosives inside the buildings. Tower 7 on the other hand, could not have fallen the way it did due to fires on one side of it. Impossible. Thousands of scientists and physicists confirm it.

What was true was that there were additional explosives in the towers. There were several vans carrying huge amounts of TNT that were stopped by the police / FBI. You never heard much about it afterwards because it didn't fit the narrative.

Also, why is it you think all that steel that remained was shipped and sold to China and India immediately after the attacks? They wanted the evidence gone asap.

"Impossible"
* Really? Has it ever happened to that building before to deem it "impossible"?
"Thousands" of scientists may "confirm it" but there are plenty who claim it is/was possible.
Who exactly is claiming that it was fire alone that brought down Tower 7? There was structural damage (that was not caused by fire) that was known before the building came down.
Once again I'll say, thousands of scientists claim global warming is a hoax and thousands claim it's not. Who is right and who is wrong? Both can't be right and both can't be wrong.

"There were additional explosives in the Tower".
* Really? What type of explosives exactly? As I said before, things explode when they are ignited/heated. Many things in the building could have exploded. You know for a fact there were explosives planted in the towers? According to whom?

"There were several vans carrying huge amounts of TNT that were stopped by the police / FBI".
* Really? "STOPPED"? Who was driving the van/s and who's TNT was it? If they were STOPPED then why/how were they involved in explosives being responsible for taking down the towers?

"ALL that steel"?
Really? "ALL"? No.

"They wanted the evidence gone asap".
Who is/are "they" exactly?