Page 2 of 67

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:28 pm
by Deleted User 318
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:04 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 8:36 pm https://ftw.usatoday.com/2020/09/chiefs ... t-of-unity

Chiefs fans causing drama already. Bad look. Probably mostly Missouri residents.
I heard that. Was trying to be in denial. A-holes.
Yeah, so uncalled for. If you don’t agree with the players fighting for equality, then don’t pay for tickets, or keep your mouths shut for 1 minute. It’s a bad look. If I were a player, I’d call out the fans for that.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:38 pm
by KU76erfan
Not nice.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:51 pm
by twocoach
Man, this KC defense has had some problems simply tackling and have still been excellent. They are going to be nasty come playoff time.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:53 pm
by pdub
Watson missing Nuk.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:53 pm
by jhawks99
Cascadia wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:27 pm
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:22 pm Sammy Watkins > T Hill
Lay off the moonshine
If I had to chooose one to keep, it would be Sammy. I think he's more reliable.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:54 pm
by pdub
Errr.
What Cascadia said.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:59 pm
by jhawks99
Refs feeling sorry for the texans? letting them get away with a false start

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:59 pm
by jhawks99
pdub wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:54 pm Errr.
What Cascadia said.
Don't make me go illy on you

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:00 pm
by Cascadia
Hill is a Top 5 WR is the NFL. Watkins gets more looks because Hill is double teamed on every play. When he’s not double teamed, he’s busting off 50-60 yards TD’s

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:01 pm
by pdub
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:59 pm Refs feeling sorry for the texans? letting them get away with a false start
Pretty blatant.
Maybe itll make Mahomes need to score again.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:02 pm
by twocoach
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:53 pm
Cascadia wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:27 pm
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:22 pm Sammy Watkins > T Hill
Lay off the moonshine
If I had to chooose one to keep, it would be Sammy. I think he's more reliable.
Because he will never need to be covered by more than one defender.

Hill is a game changer. Him just being out there demands the full attention of the entire defensive backfield. They are all doing what they are doing based on where Hill is and goes. Watkins over Hill is crazy talk.

Hill is a match-up problem against every defender on the field. Watins is only a match-up problem against the 3rd-6th defender on the opposition, which makes him a great player in the role that he fills for the Chiefs. Put him in Hill's role and this Chiefs offense isn't as good.

It's OK to be a really good WR2. That's Watkins ceiling and he'll make generational wealth to go along with a very happy and successful athlete being that.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:16 pm
by jhawks99
Heckuva run

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:16 pm
by pdub
CEH not a goalline back.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:23 pm
by pdub
Good win against a playoff caliber team. Rookies looked good.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:24 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Chiefs scored 34. Didn’t try for basically 2 quarters and still easily smacked a top 5 AFC team. Mahomes look in control. They ran the ball very well.

Defense was a welcome start. Front 7 looks good. Secondary played well. Bit banged up and a suspension to deal with.

But overall, couldn’t ask for a better start.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:32 pm
by Cascadia
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:24 pm Chiefs scored 34. Didn’t try for basically 2 quarters and still easily smacked a top 5 AFC team. Mahomes look in control. They ran the ball very well.

Defense was a welcome start. Front 7 looks good. Secondary played well. Bit banged up and a suspension to deal with.

But overall, couldn’t ask for a better start.
Agreed

Re: Chefs

Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:33 pm
by jhawks99
pdub wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:16 pm CEH not a goalline back.
Yeah, he may be a little small for that.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 5:31 am
by pdub
I know Reid is trying to reward CEH for getting them there but ( and this is putting fantasy football aside ) Anthony Sherman might be a guy you put in at 2nd and goal on the one.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:17 am
by Deleted User 318
Sausage has one running TD in nine seasons. D. Williams is your 3rd and goal back.

Re: Chefs

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:25 am
by jfish26
Cascadia wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:32 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:24 pm Chiefs scored 34. Didn’t try for basically 2 quarters and still easily smacked a top 5 AFC team. Mahomes look in control. They ran the ball very well.

Defense was a welcome start. Front 7 looks good. Secondary played well. Bit banged up and a suspension to deal with.

But overall, couldn’t ask for a better start.
Agreed
Because I look at these things from a very particular (and shared) lens, this team has the look of some of Bill's scariest KU offenses (2010-11 and 2017-18 come to mind). There's just problems everywhere, and because of that, they make shredding decent-to-good teams look routine.