Football Politics

Kansas Football.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by ousdahl »

Fuck him! For that thing he did
Deleted User 318

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 318 »

Not Nice.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18652
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by jfish26 »

twocoach wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:21 am
ousdahl wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:09 am ^^^

It’s not like anyone did something truly heinous, like kneel.
Except the guy that did. Honestly, I have no problem with a few people booing. If they just want football with no politics or they were simply people who any time an opposing team is on the field, it's their right to voice their opinion even if I disagree with it. No different than the right to protest. It's the way things are and should be. It saddens me that the notion of "unity" brings boos but the people in the stadium were probably the least informed as to what was happening and why so it's just not a big deal to me.

To expect their to be no opposition to what went on before the game would be silly when we're at the point where everything has vocal opponents these days. Such is the divisive world that Trump has made much, much worse.
It's their right, sure. But it shows your ass, and becomes a national talking point about your team, fanbase and city.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by pdub »

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:33 am #MakeVegaBossAgain
If you would like to have custom code written into the bored to mess with your specific account, then yes.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by ousdahl »

zlul
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by ousdahl »

?laer rof tiaw
Deleted User 318

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 318 »

Remember that time dotNet had no e's? Those were fun times.
User avatar
PhDhawk
Posts: 10076
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:03 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by PhDhawk »

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:33 am
NiceDC wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:30 am It was the teams that were doing it, not the league. Sounds like Goodell is just going to let the teams do what they want before games, so you are probably going to see some teams very vocal, and some being more passive. And pDub won't let us talk about any of it.
#MakeVegaBossAgain
Fuck that nonsense.
I only came to kick some ass...

Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20949
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by twocoach »

jfish26 wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:38 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:21 am
ousdahl wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:09 am ^^^

It’s not like anyone did something truly heinous, like kneel.
Except the guy that did. Honestly, I have no problem with a few people booing. If they just want football with no politics or they were simply people who any time an opposing team is on the field, it's their right to voice their opinion even if I disagree with it. No different than the right to protest. It's the way things are and should be. It saddens me that the notion of "unity" brings boos but the people in the stadium were probably the least informed as to what was happening and why so it's just not a big deal to me.

To expect their to be no opposition to what went on before the game would be silly when we're at the point where everything has vocal opponents these days. Such is the divisive world that Trump has made much, much worse.
It's their right, sure. But it shows your ass, and becomes a national talking point about your team, fanbase and city.
Agreed. Freedom to protest and to speak your opinion is not free from consequence.
User avatar
PhDhawk
Posts: 10076
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:03 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by PhDhawk »

I just think it's funny that pdub isn't aware that his entire message bored is a liberal politics bored. It hasn't been about sports, or KU for a long time.
I only came to kick some ass...

Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Deleted User 318

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 318 »

One thing to remember was it was supposed to be a moment of silence. What sort of jerk boos during a moment of silence. That's what irks me the most. If you want to judge, fine, but the players are trying to do something, and you're interjecting for no reason other than you disagree with it.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by pdub »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:42 am?laer rof tiaw

Code: Select all

function reverse(str){
  let reversed = "";
  for(let char of str){
    reversed = char + reversed;
  }
  return reversed;
}
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by pdub »

PhDhawk wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:48 am I just think it's funny that pdub isn't aware that his entire message bored is a liberal politics bored. It hasn't been about sports, or KU for a long time.
It's tough when there are no sports at all.
And now that sports are back, we can't even talk about sports.
Deleted User 89

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 89 »

NiceDC wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:01 am As racism is not a political topic, I will instead talk about football players that have gone into politics.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/119 ... -politics
1. Byron "Whizzer" White

Byron "Whizzer" White was one of the most prolific NFL running backs despite only playing in the NFL for such a short time—yet his biggest impact would come well after his NFL career was over.

White was an All-American running back at the University of Colorado who was drafted with the fourth pick in the first round by the Pittsburgh Pirates (now the Steelers). In his rookie season with the Pirates, White would lead the league in rushing with 567 yards on 152 attempts and four touchdowns, while also passing for 393 yards and two touchdowns.
I've never heard of this guy.
2. Heath Shuler

One of the few NFL rules I used to live by went like this: high draft pick plus prolonged holdout equals future NFL bust. Heath Shuler is definitely an embodiment of this rule as he held out of Redskins training camp for 13 days prior to his rookie season before signing an eight-year, $19.25 million contract—which at the time was the highest contract ever signed by a rookie.
I know Heath Ledger, and the Shuler name sounds very footbally, but I don't know this guy.
3. Lynn Swann

When you think of Lynn Swann, many things come to mind as a football fan. You think of his four Super Bowl rings, three Pro Bowl appearances, a Super Bowl MVP in Super Bowl X, an array some of the greatest catches not just in the 70's, but of all-time (including this Super Bowl X gem) as well as his support of social conservative issues such as the pro-life cause and gun-ownership rights.

Wait, what?

Lynn Swann hasn't held an elected office yet, but he does have his aspirations. In 2006, Swann ran against then-incumbent Pennsylvania Governor (and Eagles Fan and analyst on Comcast SportsNet Philadelphia) Ed Rendell.
I love Swanny! But he never has been elected to anything, so he sounds like a looser.
4. Alan Page

He is dignified, accomplished, and someone who has managed to excel in two fields. But saying that would still be selling Alan Page short.

Page played 15 seasons in the NFL, the majority of them with the Minnesota Vikings. In that time, he went to the Super Bowl four times with the Vikings, won the 1971 NFL MVP award, was a nine-time Pro Bowl selection, a six-time NFL All-Pro, 1970 NFL Defensive Player of The Year and a Hall of Famer.
This sounds like a white guy. But never heard of him.
5. Sam Wyche

Forgive me, Clevelanders, if I offend any of you with this video. Sorry, but to this day I still find it hilarious. If you choose, feel free to replace "Cleveland" with my hometown of Miami and let the laughter ensue.

This speech to Bengals fans might not have given many the impression that Bengals coach Sam Wyche would one day have a career in politics; however, that's exactly what came to pass.
Best name. Worst city.
6. Steve Largent

Steve Largent is one of the most accomplished wide receivers in NFL history.

The seven-time Pro Bowler and eight-time NFL All-Pro receiver at one point held virtually every receiving record in the NFL and became the first Seahawk to have his number retired. He's also a member of the NFL's all-1980s team.

After an NFL career like that, most players either sit back and enjoy retirement, or become talking heads on TV.

But Largent instead decided to serve in Congress. In 1994, Largent ran for Oklahoma's first district in the House of Representatives as a Republican. He won that election, garnering 63 percent of the vote in the predominantly Republican district, which includes Tulsa. In fact, Largent won every election while serving as a representative with at least 62 percent of the vote.
Wow! This guy sounds like a stud! Never heard of him.
7. Craig James

Many of you know Craig James as a college football analyst at ESPN whose son was caught in a controversy that lead to the dismissal of Coach Mike Leach from his post as Head Coach at Texas Tech.

However, James had a brief NFL run where he made a huge mark.

He was the leading rusher for the New England Patriots in 1985 when he rushed for 1,227 yards and lead the Patriots to Super Bowl XX. James was the last white NFL running back to rush for more than 1,000 yards until 2010 when Peyton Hillis reached that mark.
This name reminds me of Daniel Craig, who plays James Bond. I don't follow British politics.
8. Jon Runyan

Jon Runyan will go down in NFL history for many things.

He was the last active NFL player to play for the Houston Oilers—who drafted him in the fourth round in 1996. He was also an NFL All-Pro selection in 1999, a Pro Bowler in 2002 and was named to the Philadelphia Eagles 75th anniversary team.
Great NFL name! Don't remember him. I do miss the Oilers. I think GQ does too.
9. Peter Boulware

One of the most imposing forces on an imposing defense, Peter Boulware showed opposing offenses he meant business while playing for the Baltimore Ravens from 1997-2005.

During that time, Boulware was the Defensive Rookie of the Year, a four-time Pro Bowler, an NFL All-Pro and a Super Bowl champion.

After retiring in 1997, Boulware hoped to find similar success in politics.
Boulware sounds like cheap dishes 19-year-olds would register for
10. Jack Kemp

One of the players with the biggest impact in both the worlds of football and politics is the late Jack Kemp.

Kemp was originally drafted in the 17th round of the 1957 draft by the Detroit Lions, but was cut by the team prior to the season. He would serve on the taxi squads for the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1957 and the New York Giants in 1958. After that, Kemp served a year as a private in the United States Army Reserves, but would play one game in the CFL for the Calgary Stampeders.
I hope you stayed for this one! I had no idea Kemp ever played in the NFL. Really cool.
didn’t read the link, but doubt it mentions our up-and-comer out here in Utah, Burgess Owens. guy seems pretty worthless, but it is Utah
User avatar
PhDhawk
Posts: 10076
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:03 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by PhDhawk »

pdub wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:51 am
PhDhawk wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:48 am I just think it's funny that pdub isn't aware that his entire message bored is a liberal politics bored. It hasn't been about sports, or KU for a long time.
It's tough when there are no sports at all.
And now that sports are back, we can't even talk about sports.
Majority of those who cared about KU sports first and foremost don't post anymore, or have become full on politics honks.
I only came to kick some ass...

Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 17447
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Football Politics

Post by jhawks99 »

NiceDC wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:30 am It was the teams that were doing it, not the league. Sounds like Goodell is just going to let the teams do what they want before games, so you are probably going to see some teams very vocal, and some being more passive. And pDub won't let us talk about any of it.
Pdub is letting everyone talk about it, including you. He just asked to keep it in the politics bored or this thread.
Defense. Rebounds.
Deleted User 318

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 318 »

TraditionKU wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:55 am didn’t read the link, but doubt it mentions our up-and-comer out here in Utah, Burgess Owens. guy seems pretty worthless, but it is Utah
Oh! Real politics! Can you be an up-and-comer at 69?

Also, from his wiki:
At a June 1, 2020, Republican primary debate, Owens said Democrats in Washington are held in thrall by Marxists and socialists, whom he described as enemies of America. "The days of Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill are over. We're dealing with people who hate our country," Owens said. He also said the Affordable Care Act should be repealed and that he supported President Donald Trump.
...
During an appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight on July 31, 2020, Owens said the National Basketball Association, led by Commissioner Adam Silver, is made up of "corporate cowards" whose first priority is access to the Chinese basketball market, and who seek to ensure Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election to that end.[14]

In August 2020, Media Matters, a left-leaning media watchdog group, reported that in May 2020, Burgess had appeared as a guest on a YouTube show that is tied to the far-right conspiracy theory QAnon. QAnon was not mentioned during his appearance on the show. When questioned about his appearance on the show, Burgess said he was unfamiliar with QAnon, and his campaign said he did not support it.[15][16][17]
Seems like your run of the mill Republican.
Deleted User 318

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 318 »

jhawks99 wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:56 am
NiceDC wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:30 am It was the teams that were doing it, not the league. Sounds like Goodell is just going to let the teams do what they want before games, so you are probably going to see some teams very vocal, and some being more passive. And pDub won't let us talk about any of it.
Pdub is letting everyone talk about it, including you. He just asked to keep it in the politics bored or this thread.
You missed the morning when pDub was moving actual responses of his posts, and taking things out of context by moving them. I requested Dubs to delete that thread, since it made it look like I was making the topic and posts, and he recreated this thread.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35792
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Football Politics

Post by pdub »

I moved posts to a new thread, titled 'Football Politics'.
Unfortunately when I moved it, and your earlier chronological post, it edited the new thread I created with your post and made that the default original post, and then you kept editing the thread topic.
I PM'd you this information.

Continue away with your crusade.
Deleted User 318

Re: Football Politics

Post by Deleted User 318 »

pdub wrote: Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:03 am I moved posts to a new thread, titled 'Football Politics'.
Unfortunately when I moved it, and your earlier chronological post, it edited the new thread I created with your post and made that the default original post, and then you kept editing the thread topic.
I PM'd you this information.

Continue away with your crusade.
Because, again, I did not create the thread, and you were taking my words out context by moving the posts. Things directly responding to your posts lose context when they are moved.
Post Reply