What's infuriating about this is we know a lot of powerful people did some awful things. Ghislaine Maxwell knows all the deets. Are we just... never going to find out?
This is one of those conspiracy theories that's infuriating due to the fact that there's a lot of there there.
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2023 10:44 pm
by Sparko
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:30 pm
Good. Fuck JPMorgan and fuck Jaime Dimon.
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:30 pm
Good. Fuck JPMorgan and fuck Jaime Dimon.
Yup.
This question is for DC, Sparko, (and anyone/everyone else who would care to answer)....
Be honest, do you really give a flying fuck about what Dimon and J.P. Morgan had (and didn't have) to do with Epstein?
Now if you are saying fuck J.P. Morgan and Jaime Dimon for other reasons, I can and do believe your anger/hatred and do/would understand your sentiment.
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 7:52 am
by ousdahl
Yea
Is this “fuck them” a fuck them specific to the Epstein shit, or in a more general Evil Rich People kinda way?
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 12, 2023 9:30 pm
Good. Fuck JPMorgan and fuck Jaime Dimon.
Yup.
This question is for DC, Sparko, (and anyone/everyone else who would care to answer)....
Be honest, do you really give a flying fuck about what Dimon and J.P. Morgan had (and didn't have) to do with Epstein?
The lawsuit is one of several targeting banks who serviced Epstein's financial dealings for years, even after it emerged in 2006 that Epstein was using his wealth to exploit minors and young women. Last month, Deutsche Bank agreed to a $75 million settlement in a similar case.
That a company has so much money that they can just throw that amount of money down the pipe to be done with a case like this is mind boggling. From the limited amount I have seen on this, it is a huge stretch to say that the bank "facilitated" anything other than to be a bank where a scumbag kept his money. Every bank in America probably has a few everyday scumbags. Should we now make it a policy that US banks can just decide to jettison a customer because they think that are scummy people?
The lawsuit is one of several targeting banks who serviced Epstein's financial dealings for years, even after it emerged in 2006 that Epstein was using his wealth to exploit minors and young women. Last month, Deutsche Bank agreed to a $75 million settlement in a similar case.
That a company has so much money that they can just throw that amount of money down the pipe to be done with a case like this is mind boggling. From the limited amount I have seen on this, it is a huge stretch to say that the bank "facilitated" anything other than to be a bank where a scumbag kept his money. Every bank in America probably has a few everyday scumbags. Should we now make it a policy that US banks can just decide to jettison a customer because they think that are scummy people?
I hear you.
I have read the article but I am still struggling to come to terms that someone was "rewarded" 290 million dollars FROM J.P. MORGAN.
It makes me realize we live in a country where someone can become incredibly wealthy because someone did something to them - ok, that's not always so bad but what I find really bad is that it gives people an incentive to try and SCAM their way in to "settlements" - and it happens. Too often Scumbags get rewarded while the good guys get screwed.
Realize that's coming from someone (me) who used to process general liability insurance claims.
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 9:12 am
by KUTradition
Too often Scumbags get rewarded while the good guys get screwed.
there’s a reason “nice guys finish last” is even a thing
The lawsuit is one of several targeting banks who serviced Epstein's financial dealings for years, even after it emerged in 2006 that Epstein was using his wealth to exploit minors and young women. Last month, Deutsche Bank agreed to a $75 million settlement in a similar case.
That a company has so much money that they can just throw that amount of money down the pipe to be done with a case like this is mind boggling. From the limited amount I have seen on this, it is a huge stretch to say that the bank "facilitated" anything other than to be a bank where a scumbag kept his money. Every bank in America probably has a few everyday scumbags. Should we now make it a policy that US banks can just decide to jettison a customer because they think that are scummy people?
I hear you.
I have read the article but I am still struggling to come to terms that someone was "rewarded" 290 million dollars FROM J.P. MORGAN.
It makes me realize we live in a country where someone can become incredibly wealthy because someone did something to them - ok, that's not always so bad but what I find really bad is that it gives people an incentive to try and SCAM their way in to "settlements" - and it happens. Too often Scumbags get rewarded while the good guys get screwed.
Realize that's coming from someone (me) who used to process general liability insurance claims.
The world is full of people looking to cash in on being the next "Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants" case and the laws are set up so that lawyers can milk those cases for endless streams of revenue.
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2023 11:38 am
by ousdahl
Isn’t the $290 million just a SETTLEMENT, too?
Like the amount JP Morgan was willing to pay to AVOID actually going to trial
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:22 pm
by Shirley
A new report by Department of Justice found that the prison employees at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan failed to monitor Jeffrey Epstein for four hours before his death and lied about their negligence in the lead up to his 2019 death.
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2023 3:56 pm
by Shirley
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:32 pm
by randylahey
Re: Epstein Island
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2023 12:40 pm
by jhawks99
Bill Clinton, still in charge 23 years after leaving office.
