Kansas Crimson

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:27 am I don’t mean to hold party lines. I don’t consider myself a dem fwiw.

If I may objectively and sincerely ask - has anyone besides Trump alleged any wrongdoing by Hunter?

So why not just say, "sure, we'll have him testify"

Sure, why not.

What’s Hunter gonna say that’ll be so damning?

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:45 am Sure, why not.

What’s Hunter gonna say that’ll be so damning?

Will he be coked up when he testifies, or will they clean him up first?

Damning!

The question of Hunter's relevance is also the question of Giuliani's reliability.

I don't know if it's in this thread or another, but there's a bit from a couple weeks ago where Lindsey Graham warned Giuliani that he'd better not be full of shit -- because Giuliani is making some very serious accusations, about Hunter, about his dad, about cover-ups, etc.

If Giuliani is truly 100% of his meds, then there's no way the Republicans bring Hunter in. If he's NOT, though, then the trial becomes about the Bidens and their corruption, which vindicates Trump's concerns. Or so the theory goes.

I don't what to think of Rudy, but he appears completely insane

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:12 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:45 am Sure, why not.

What’s Hunter gonna say that’ll be so damning?

Will he be coked up when he testifies, or will they clean him up first?

I don't know, but the Pubs should make sure Matt Gaetz is there to ridicule him.
Anyone know what Gaetz up to these days?
Besides getting in to a twitter war with Chris Latvala - who is also a douche bag.

Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:32 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:12 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:45 am Sure, why not.

What’s Hunter gonna say that’ll be so damning?

Will he be coked up when he testifies, or will they clean him up first?

I don't know, but the Pubs should make sure Matt Gaetz is there to ridicule him.
Anyone know what Gaetz up to these days?
Besides getting in to a twitter war with Chris Latvala - who is also a douche bag.

I enjoy watching him. Kind of a younger, shorter, Bill O'Reilly. You can at least count on him to be entertaining.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:27 am The question of Hunter's relevance is also the question of Giuliani's reliability.

I don't know if it's in this thread or another, but there's a bit from a couple weeks ago where Lindsey Graham warned Giuliani that he'd better not be full of shit -- because Giuliani is making some very serious accusations, about Hunter, about his dad, about cover-ups, etc.

If Giuliani is truly 100% of his meds, then there's no way the Republicans bring Hunter in. If he's NOT, though, then the trial becomes about the Bidens and their corruption, which vindicates Trump's concerns. Or so the theory goes.

I don't what to think of Rudy, but he appears completely insane

And, as you've been saying for months, he should be subpoened.

Bringing in Hunter Biden just adds to the circus. And while Rudy is truly a clown, it appears he really has a lot to lose.

Bringing Hunter Biden in is feeding fuel to the narrative that Trump is some kind of master detective, working his greatest case.

I would like to know of any other cases that Trump and Co and feverishly working to root out world wide corruption.

I assume none, unless a potential Dem opponent is involved.

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:37 am

Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:32 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:12 am

Will he be coked up when he testifies, or will they clean him up first?

I don't know, but the Pubs should make sure Matt Gaetz is there to ridicule him.
Anyone know what Gaetz up to these days?
Besides getting in to a twitter war with Chris Latvala - who is also a douche bag.

I enjoy watching him.

Never thought otherwise. Ass clowns tend to gather in clusters.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:56 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:37 am

Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:32 am

I don't know, but the Pubs should make sure Matt Gaetz is there to ridicule him.
Anyone know what Gaetz up to these days?
Besides getting in to a twitter war with Chris Latvala - who is also a douche bag.

I enjoy watching him.

Never thought otherwise. Ass clowns tend to gather in clusters.

Funny, I was thinking the same of you and your troupe of toadies.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:27 am I don’t mean to hold party lines. I don’t consider myself a dem fwiw.

If I may objectively and sincerely ask - has anyone besides Trump alleged any wrongdoing by Hunter?

You can only be a republican or a snowflake.

I remember when Republicans weren't complete dickheads.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 12:14 pm I remember when Republicans weren't complete dickheads.

The dems are innocent.

Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:32 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:12 am

ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:45 am Sure, why not.

What’s Hunter gonna say that’ll be so damning?

Will he be coked up when he testifies, or will they clean him up first?

I don't know, but the Pubs should make sure Matt Gaetz is there to ridicule him.
Anyone know what Gaetz up to these days?
Besides getting in to a twitter war with Chris Latvala - who is also a douche bag.

Come on, Gutter, this is just too good to not give the link.

State rep accuses U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz of inventing sex game

Latvala responded by accusing Gaetz of having “created a game where members of the FL House got ‘points’ for sleeping with aides, interns, lobbyists and married legislators.”


https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/polit ... story.html

Here's the link with the actual twitter responses.

https://www.tampabay.com/florida-politi ... and-daddy/

chiknbut wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:37 am

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 11:27 am The question of Hunter's relevance is also the question of Giuliani's reliability.

I don't know if it's in this thread or another, but there's a bit from a couple weeks ago where Lindsey Graham warned Giuliani that he'd better not be full of shit -- because Giuliani is making some very serious accusations, about Hunter, about his dad, about cover-ups, etc.

If Giuliani is truly 100% of his meds, then there's no way the Republicans bring Hunter in. If he's NOT, though, then the trial becomes about the Bidens and their corruption, which vindicates Trump's concerns. Or so the theory goes.

I don't what to think of Rudy, but he appears completely insane

And, as you've been saying for months, he should be subpoened.

Bringing in Hunter Biden just adds to the circus. And while Rudy is truly a clown, it appears he really has a lot to lose.

Yup. And yup.

I’m all for investigating Hunter - IF there is reasonable suspicion to investigate. I’m just not sure how reasonable it is if the only ones calling to investigate are Trump and his cronies - which, by now, include how many lock step republicans. Again, why did Ukraine decline to do so? What’s the intelligence community and American LEO have to say?

And even then, say Hunter gets up there to talk. What’s he gonna admit to that’ll suddenly vindicate Trump? Or make any of Trump’s alleged actions OK...(eta how does Hunter being a crook have any bearing on Trump running a shadow state department?)

And finally, a big hearty LOL to Lindsay Graham warning others about being full of shit.

I'm enjoying this thread, but I really think Ainsley Earhardt deserves her own.

What an absolute cuckoo bird.

If posting Fox News headlines for satirical discussion can make this many heads explode, just think how outraged all the sincere viewers must be!

I guess the defense is, with no evidence (Should the Republicans go to the Courts like they say Pelosi and Co. should have done? Where is the process?) the Bidens extorted, too. So what Trump did is okay.

I just never heard of that defense before.

I think Geezer suggested, would courts even have the jurisdiction?