Kansas Crimson

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 1:30 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:54 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:12 am
Huh?

My guess is that Lindell was in contact with Tina Peters or someone in her circle and the FBI wants to know more about those conversations. Hence the questions about her.

Oh, no shit, huh!?! You don't say.

Gutter mentioned the president. I responded. Pay attention.


As long as the infomercials stop, and we can all watch our nightly Tucker and Hannity in peace, without those cheap slippers and over priced pillows on every 15min then I am fine with whatever happens to the pillow man.

It's not a matter of "paying attention". It's a matter of reading what you wrote. If you thought they were looking for info about Peters and not for messages from Trump then type that instead of some failed attempt at humor (if that's what that even was). We can only go off of what you type.

Huh?

Why would I mention Peters when the (former) president was being discussed?


(Please. Spare us. Those were rhetorical questions. No need to respond or engage. 99 will be by shortly to try to get the last word.)

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 1:45 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 1:30 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 12:54 pm

Oh, no shit, huh!?! You don't say.

Gutter mentioned the president. I responded. Pay attention.


As long as the infomercials stop, and we can all watch our nightly Tucker and Hannity in peace, without those cheap slippers and over priced pillows on every 15min then I am fine with whatever happens to the pillow man.

It's not a matter of "paying attention". It's a matter of reading what you wrote. If you thought they were looking for info about Peters and not for messages from Trump then type that instead of some failed attempt at humor (if that's what that even was). We can only go off of what you type.

Huh?

Why would I mention Peters when the (former) president was being discussed?


(Please. Spare us. Those were rhetorical questions. No need to respond or engage. 99 will be by shortly to try to get the last word.)

Because you commented (incorrectly) on what the FBI would be looking for on his phone.

"They're maybe hoping for some dumb text messages from Trump. They're desperate for anything they can call a smoking gun. At least that's how it appears to me."

If your comment is in response to a previous post in the thread then maybe you could reply to that statement so that it is included and helps to make your statement a little more clear. Otherwise, a random post will be treated as such. We aren't mind readers.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 2:02 pm If your comment is in response to a previous post in the thread then maybe you could reply to that statement so that it is more clear. Otherwise, a random post will be treated as such. We aren't mind readers.

Dang. You engaged. Again. Shocker.


Dude, you don't need to read minds. You just need to read words. The posts were in succession. A clear convo between two people. Neither of which happened to be you.


Pretty please. Find something else to do for a bit.

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 2:04 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 2:02 pm If your comment is in response to a previous post in the thread then maybe you could reply to that statement so that it is more clear. Otherwise, a random post will be treated as such. We aren't mind readers.

Dang. You engaged. Again. Shocker.


Dude, you don't need to read minds. You just need to read words. The posts were in succession. A clear convo between two people. Neither of which happened to be you.


Pretty please. Find something else to do for a bit.

It's a public message board. I responded to a post on it that contained information that seemed to be pretty blatantly wrong in my opinion based on what I read about the topic being discussed. Just as you do and just as everyone else here does. It's not weird. If you want to have private chats with others then engage the PM feature. If you don't want to engage others on the topic then don't. If you don't want to have to defend your inaccurate comments that are made as an attempt to be a witty then don't make them in a public forum.

It'd have been so much easier for you to just say "sorry, didn't see gutters post".

(I didn't quote you, but I'll assume you know I am talking to you)


For someone who claims to avoid engaging with me, you sure engage an awful lot. Any chance I can direct you to the ignore function? Just let me know.

More info on the case regarding this Tina Peters woman out in Colorado:

https://coloradosun.com/2022/09/14/mike ... na-peters/

It concerns me how many Trumpers like this woman have been installed at various county election offices like this all across rural America. Since Trump's go-to move is to accuse everyone else of doing something that he is guilty of doing, it just makes it feel like he is putting together pieces to try to alter the votes in various areas in the next Presidential election.

…go-to move is to accuse everyone else of doing something that he is guilty of doing…

hmmmm…

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:52 pm More info on the case regarding this Tina Peters woman out in Colorado:

https://coloradosun.com/2022/09/14/mike ... na-peters/

It concerns me how many Trumpers like this woman have been installed at various county election offices like this all across rural America. Since Trump's go-to move is to accuse everyone else of doing something that he is guilty of doing, it just makes it feel like he is putting together pieces to try to alter the votes in various areas in the next Presidential election.

Trump is putting these people in these local county election jobs? I was unaware that is something presidents/former presidents were responsible for.

That's certainly not how it works in any of the counties I have ever lived in.


But trump is such a mastermind (sarcasm alert) that anything is possible i suppose.

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 5:45 pm Trump is putting these people in these local county election jobs? I was unaware that is something presidents/former presidents were responsible for.

That's certainly not how it works in any of the counties I have ever lived in.


But trump is such a mastermind (sarcasm alert) that anything is possible i suppose.

You can be sarcastic all you want but essentially the entire Republican Party is doing Trump’s bidding. So, yes, Trump is systematically installing extreme people in places of power. He’s doing this by picking candidates for various offices.

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 5:45 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:52 pm More info on the case regarding this Tina Peters woman out in Colorado:

https://coloradosun.com/2022/09/14/mike ... na-peters/

It concerns me how many Trumpers like this woman have been installed at various county election offices like this all across rural America. Since Trump's go-to move is to accuse everyone else of doing something that he is guilty of doing, it just makes it feel like he is putting together pieces to try to alter the votes in various areas in the next Presidential election.

Trump is putting these people in these local county election jobs? I was unaware that is something presidents/former presidents were responsible for.

That's certainly not how it works in any of the counties I have ever lived in.


But trump is such a mastermind (sarcasm alert) that anything is possible i suppose.

I didn't say anything about Trump himself doing it. ZSN seems to have had no problem understanding.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 8:53 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 5:45 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:52 pm More info on the case regarding this Tina Peters woman out in Colorado:

https://coloradosun.com/2022/09/14/mike ... na-peters/

It concerns me how many Trumpers like this woman have been installed at various county election offices like this all across rural America. Since Trump's go-to move is to accuse everyone else of doing something that he is guilty of doing, it just makes it feel like he is putting together pieces to try to alter the votes in various areas in the next Presidential election.

Trump is putting these people in these local county election jobs? I was unaware that is something presidents/former presidents were responsible for.

That's certainly not how it works in any of the counties I have ever lived in.


But trump is such a mastermind (sarcasm alert) that anything is possible i suppose.

I didn't say anything about Trump himself doing it.

Oh really....

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 8:53 pmTrump's go-to move is to accuse everyone else of doing something that he is guilty of doing, it just makes it feel like he is putting together pieces to try to alter the votes in various areas in the next Presidential election.

Not sure who else "he" would be.

Mr. Literal thinks that I mean that Trump is personally hiring these people. Sheesh.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:03 pm Mr. Literal thinks that I mean that Trump is personally hiring these people. Sheesh.

You said it, not me.

Just holding you to your own standards.

Trump the mastermind. LOL. Trump is a damn idiot.

If you don't understand who and what makes up the network of Trumpers from the grassroots level up at this point after this many years then it would be impossible to explain it you.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:03 pm Mr. Literal thinks that I mean that Trump is personally hiring these people. Sheesh.

illy is the dumbest person on the board. Which says a lot since we have mich.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/16/politics ... index.html

Here’s the exchange:

"Hewitt: You know the old saying. A prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich if they want to. I’m just asking if there is such a prosecutor and they indict you, would that deter you from running for president again?

Trump: I don’t think the people of the United States would stand for it. And as you know, if a thing like that happened, I would have no prohibition against running. You know that. You’ve already stated that.

Hewitt: I do. That’s what I wanted people to understand. That would not take you out of the arena.

Trump: It would not. But I think if it happened, I think you’d have problems in this country the likes of which perhaps we’ve never seen before. I don’t think the people of the United States would stand for it.

Hewitt: What kind of problems, Mr. President.

Trump: I think they’d have big problems, big problems. I just don’t think they’d stand for it. They will not, they will not sit still and stand for this ultimate of hoaxes. "

Fun times ahead, I am sure.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/21/politics ... index.html

" The New York state attorney general filed a sweeping lawsuit Wednesday against former President Donald Trump, three of his adult children and the Trump Organization, alleging they were involved in an expansive fraud lasting over a decade that the former President used to enrich himself.

In the more than 200-page lawsuit, Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, alleges the fraud touched all aspects of the Trump business, including its properties and golf courses. According to the lawsuit, the Trump Organization deceived lenders, insurers and tax authorities by inflating the value of his properties using misleading appraisals.
Trump Tower, home to the Trump Organization, stands along Fifth Avenue on June 30, 2021 in New York City.

“These acts of fraud and misrepresentation were similar in nature, were committed by upper management at the Trump Organization as part of a common endeavor for each annual Statement, and were approved at the highest levels of the Trump Organization – including by Mr. Trump himself,” the lawsuit states. "

When will we get the 1st indictment? From Goergia? Or MAL?

It's pretty bad when you have to ask which cluster of illegal activity by the former President of the US will get indicted first and the list has multiple commas in it. New York, Georgia, Florida or TBD.

nothing will come from any of this. it is just a distraction.

but if it helps to keep dt and uncle joe off the ballot in 24.