Kansas Crimson

the EPA actions alone are likely to have ramifications for far longer

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:23 am

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:13 am ...starting with the day that he is forcibly removed from office.

Lulz. Dream on.

You misunderstood. Even if he isn't impeached (which is extremely unlikely), I do not see a scenario where he loses at the ballot box OR finishes an 8 year term.....where he simply packs his bags and strolls out the door.

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:42 am the EPA actions alone are likely to have ramifications for far longer

Let alone our standing in the world arena.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:49 am

Weird. Don't remember the outrage from you guys when Biden said this....

Guess everyone missed this post.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:50 am

And this one too.


How convenient.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:30 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:23 am

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:13 am ...starting with the day that he is forcibly removed from office.

Lulz. Dream on.

You misunderstood. Even if he isn't impeached (which is extremely unlikely), I do not see a scenario where he loses at the ballot box OR finishes an 8 year term.....where he simply packs his bags and strolls out the door.

LOL that's so ridiculous.

You think he's just going to try to be president for another year or 2?

Just waiting for you to provide something more trustworthy than a Charlie Kirk tweet that what he is alleging happened for the reason he states that it happened.

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:41 am Just waiting for you to provide something more trustworthy than a Charlie Kirk tweet that what he is alleging happened for the reason he states that it happened.

There's a fucking video on the tweet with Biden saying that's what he did.

Charlie Kirk is at least as reliable as any of the tweets Feral posts from countless people.....and yet you've never complained about hers.

How convenient.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:44 am Charlie Kirk is at least as reliable as any of the tweets Feral posts from countless people.....and yet you've never complained about hers.

How convenient.

Go do 5 seconds of research on it and you'll see why no one needs to comment on it. It's a lame conglomeration of "facts" that conveniently leaves out other facts, such as that the investigation into Butisma was long dormant under that prosecutor. It's absurd. You got duped again.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:41 am

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:30 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:23 am

Lulz. Dream on.

You misunderstood. Even if he isn't impeached (which is extremely unlikely), I do not see a scenario where he loses at the ballot box OR finishes an 8 year term.....where he simply packs his bags and strolls out the door.

LOL that's so ridiculous.

You think he's just going to try to be president for another year or 2?

I don't know, but I don't understand how you can call it ridiculous.

…..Trump threatens to have protesters beat up, and promises to pay the legal bills of anyone who carries out his threat (which, BTW, would probably be one of the few bills he will have paid)

….. He screams about wide spread voter fraud, when there is no evidence of it.
(Does anyone not recognize that this is a set up for the future)

….. He calls upon white nationalists, bikers, and the like with his dog whistle almost non stop.

…..He makes it a habit to undermine and disparage our military at regular intervals.

…..He beats his chest as the ultimate badass.

…..He threatens that he literally could murder some one and get away with it.

I could keep going, but if non of this raises any alarms...

None of those help me understand how he's just going to "stay" in the white house. Whatever that even means.

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:49 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:44 am Charlie Kirk is at least as reliable as any of the tweets Feral posts from countless people.....and yet you've never complained about hers.

How convenient.

Go do 5 seconds of research on it and you'll see why no one needs to comment on it. It's a lame conglomeration of "facts" that conveniently leaves out other facts, such as that the investigation into Butisma was long dormant under that prosecutor. It's absurd. You got duped again.

What about the video of Biden saying he did essentially what trump is accused of doing?

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:50 am None of those help me understand how he's just going to "stay" in the white house. Whatever that even means.

Ok.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:51 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:49 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:44 am Charlie Kirk is at least as reliable as any of the tweets Feral posts from countless people.....and yet you've never complained about hers.

How convenient.

Go do 5 seconds of research on it and you'll see why no one needs to comment on it. It's a lame conglomeration of "facts" that conveniently leaves out other facts, such as that the investigation into Butisma was long dormant under that prosecutor. It's absurd. You got duped again.

What about the video of Biden saying he did essentially what trump is accused of doing?

If Trump withheld the aid to a actually aid US foreign policy he would not be impeached. It's the fact that he did it for his own personal gain that is the problem.

Have you not been paying attention to any of this? Leveraging US power to help the country is called "use of power". Leveraging US power to help himself is called "abuse of power".

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:50 am

Another Republican fairy tale.

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:56 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:51 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:49 am
Go do 5 seconds of research on it and you'll see why no one needs to comment on it. It's a lame conglomeration of "facts" that conveniently leaves out other facts, such as that the investigation into Butisma was long dormant under that prosecutor. It's absurd. You got duped again.

What about the video of Biden saying he did essentially what trump is accused of doing?

If Trump withheld the aid to a actually aid US foreign policy he would not be impeached. It's the fact that he did it for his own personal gain that is the problem.

Have you not been paying attention to any of this?

LOL

So because Biden might be the Democratic nominee he can't be investigated for wrong doing because then it's ONLY for trumps personal gain. Got it.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 12:00 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:56 am

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:51 am

What about the video of Biden saying he did essentially what trump is accused of doing?

If Trump withheld the aid to a actually aid US foreign policy he would not be impeached. It's the fact that he did it for his own personal gain that is the problem.

Have you not been paying attention to any of this?

LOL

So because Biden might be the Democratic nominee he can't be investigated for wrong doing because then it's ONLY for trumps personal gain. Got it.

Your post makes zero sense in relation to what I posted. You clearly dont understand the point. It has not been proven AT SLL that what Biden did was to insulate himself from his son's role with Burisma. The facts seem to to support that this alleged "imvestigation" into Burisma by this Ukrainian prosecutor wasn't actually active and happening.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:30 am

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:23 am

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:13 am ...starting with the day that he is forcibly removed from office.

Lulz. Dream on.

You misunderstood. Even if he isn't impeached (which is extremely unlikely), I do not see a scenario where he loses at the ballot box OR finishes an 8 year term.....where he simply packs his bags and strolls out the door.

You have me there. He might very well just pick up his toys and go home.

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 12:07 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 12:00 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:56 am
If Trump withheld the aid to a actually aid US foreign policy he would not be impeached. It's the fact that he did it for his own personal gain that is the problem.

Have you not been paying attention to any of this?

LOL

So because Biden might be the Democratic nominee he can't be investigated for wrong doing because then it's ONLY for trumps personal gain. Got it.

Your post makes zero sense in relation to what I posted. You clearly dont understand the point. It has not been proven AT SLL that what Biden did was to insulate himself from his son's role with Burisma. The facts seem to to support that this alleged "imvestigation" into Burisma by this Ukrainian prosecutor wasn't actually active and happening.

And it hasn't been proven AT ALL that trump asking Ukraine to look into the Bidens was ONLY for trumps personal gain and had NOTHING to do with protecting the interests of the US.