Page 103 of 111
Re: Charges
Posted: Wed May 29, 2024 9:14 pm
by jfish26
TDub wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2024 8:53 pm
question isn't whether or not he did it, or whether or not the evidence exists ti prove he did it. It'd whether or not his people managed to get to at least 1 jury member.
I generally agree. But I can’t imagine what little the defense put out there might have actually changed anyone’s mind. I feel pretty strongly that if this results in a mistrial, it will because at least one juror was never going to find him guilty, going in.
Re: Charges
Posted: Wed May 29, 2024 9:48 pm
by Sparko
The Trump strategy divide and get 8.5 percent. Insanity must run at that level.
Re: Charges
Posted: Wed May 29, 2024 9:55 pm
by jfish26
Today was a good day for Trump’s prosecutors: the jury has requested precisely the evidence that ADA Steinglass told them in his closing to focus on that proves the election law conspiracy:
1. Steinglass referred to the August 2015 meeting at Trump Tower as “really the prism through which you should analyze the evidence in this case,” the “meeting that hatched the election law conspiracy,” and evidence of Trump’s direct involvement in the election conspiracy.
2. Steinglass said of Pecker’s June 2016 call with Trump: “with all of the evidence and documents in this case, it’s easy to lose sight of the significance of this phone call.” Steinglass argued it shows that Trump knew McDougal, discussed purchasing her story, and Trump deputized Cohen to act on his behalf.
3. Steinglass said that when AMI spent $125K to purchase the McDougal life rights to kill her story at Trump’s request to help his candidacy, it made a campaign contribution. “And Pecker told you exactly that.” “Corporations are not allowed to donate to candidates. Period.”
https://x.com/kgreenberg_/status/179597 ... q_-8Yt1KMA
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 3:39 pm
by jfish26
Verdict.
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 3:43 pm
by KUTradition
jfish26 wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 3:39 pmVerdict.
?
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 3:45 pm
by KUTradition
just announced on cbs
damn, fish…i hope you aren’t that quick in the bedroom
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 3:46 pm
by DeletedUser
This should be interesting
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 3:53 pm
by KUTradition
cbs reporting that trump is pouting, staring at the judge
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 3:53 pm
by DeletedUser
What always makes me laugh, looking back, is that Stormy Daniel's telling the world about banging Trump probably wouldn't have even hurt his chances of winning.
Oops.
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:00 pm
by jhawks99
Seems quick. I assume it's good news.
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:02 pm
by KUTradition
10 hours of deliberation, for 30-some charges seems awful quick
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:07 pm
by Overlander
Guilty
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:08 pm
by jhawks99
34 and 0
Guilty
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:10 pm
by jfish26
KUTradition wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 3:45 pm
just announced on cbs
damn, fish…i hope you aren’t that quick in the bedroom
If you can't tell, there's a TV in my office lol.
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:11 pm
by pdub
I'm stunned that Trump and his team didn't get dark/dirty to buy one of the jurors.
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:14 pm
by jfish26
jhawks99 wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 4:08 pm
34 and 0
Guilty
And this was the
weakest of the cases against Trump. Makes you angry at the thumbs on the scale in those other cases.
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:15 pm
by DeletedUser
Supreme Court to the rescue?
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:17 pm
by KUTradition
July 11 sentencing
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:18 pm
by Shirley
Re: Charges
Posted: Thu May 30, 2024 4:18 pm
by jfish26
DeletedUser wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 4:15 pm
Supreme Court to the rescue?
Overturning a jury verdict is a tall, tall task.
What you're going to hear from the right is bad-faith, ignorant bleating over the notion that the jury was not required to be unanimous on
which crime the business records were falsified to cover up.
While this is somewhat confusing, do NOT buy into the nonsense that "he wasn't even told what he was charged with."
