Kansas Crimson

too bad Obama isn’t in office anymore

now, where’s that moving goalposts gif....

Goddamn....both sides DO do it!

if Obama did nothing, does that mean trump has done less than nothing?

(other than play buddy buddy with putin)

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/ ... nce-241547

saying they did “nothing” seems a bit disingenuous, but whatevs

dammit, it Is Obummer's fault.

and isn’t the narrative that putin preferred trump because hill-dawg would’ve been harder on him?

You guys leave Feral alone.

She's having a tough time coping.

Commentary from Rick Wilson:

The portraits of this White House as madhouse from Fire and Fury to Fear to freaking Omarosa are of an administration where no one is in charge, nothing is true, and chaos rules each day. All are borne out in the special counsel’s report. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-say ... g?ref=home

Sort of puts the lie to the whataboutism about the concerns of various levels of Obama officialdom over Russian meddling.

seahawk wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 7:29 am Commentary from Rick Wilson:

The portraits of this White House as madhouse from Fire and Fury to Fear to freaking Omarosa are of an administration where no one is in charge, nothing is true, and chaos rules each day. All are borne out in the special counsel’s report. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-say ... g?ref=home

Sort of puts the lie to the whataboutism about the concerns of various levels of Obama officialdom over Russian meddling.

from the link...

hadn’t heard that no comedian will be invited to the correspondents’ dinner

fucking snowflakes

don’t think i’ve ever seen such tough talk backed up by cowardice

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 7:48 am

seahawk wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 7:29 am Commentary from Rick Wilson:

The portraits of this White House as madhouse from Fire and Fury to Fear to freaking Omarosa are of an administration where no one is in charge, nothing is true, and chaos rules each day. All are borne out in the special counsel’s report. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-say ... g?ref=home

Sort of puts the lie to the whataboutism about the concerns of various levels of Obama officialdom over Russian meddling.

from the link...

hadn’t heard that no comedian will be invited to the correspondents’ dinner

fucking snowflakes

don’t think i’ve ever seen such tough talk backed up by cowardice

But



















heel spur

Mrs 99, who has been a nurse for 25 years, disagrees with her.

Why does the party that extols hard work always seem to denigrate those who actually do it?

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 11:18 am


Mrs 99, who has been a nurse for 25 years, disagrees with her.

Why does the party that extols hard work always seem to denigrate those who actually do it?

I can't imagine, 99. Probably for the same reason(s) they can pollute the earth and promote taking health care coverage from tens of millions of Americans so blithely, with no viable plan whatsoever of what to do for those Americans as an alternative.

Says the guy who conducted a 4 year long investigation, from 1994 - '98, into the Whitewater deal which occurred in 1979, and ended with the republican-controlled house impeaching Bill Clinton for lying about a blow job. Fuck off, hypocrite.

worse for the country than having someone like trump in office?

there is a reason the founders put the mechanism in place

the country will survive regardless

the hypocrisy of those on the right, while not really surprising, is troubling and sad

zero integrity

lulz

You should impeach everyone.

lulz that you’re ok with all of this

This is why historical ignorance -- yours in particular -- matters.

please...

i remember full well what the reasoning was behind the clinton impeachment, and the justification members of YOUR grand old party (lulz indeed) gave at the time

but please, tell us all how obama...yada yada yada, blah blah blah

I’d be curious for DC to expand on the whole “historical ignorance” thing.

Historically, have we had anything come close to a president being investigated for potential collusion with a foreign adversary?