Kansas Crimson

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:55 pm

chiknbut wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:09 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 2:52 pm

I feel bad/sad for many of you as well. Good people, but just poorly instructed on how to evaluate and think critically.

Lobs, you're a Party of 1. Everyone else is making fun of you and, yes, exposing your arguments. Nothing you have posted has not been shut down by several people on this board. Hell, Japhy is fucking eating your breakfast, lunch, dinner and late-night snack.

You're like the guy at the poker table who can't figure out who the sucker is.

The numbers of people who agree have nothing to do with whether something is valid. Lots of people believed in Hitler too. I knew this would be an uphill battle, but I at the very least, have created some cognitive dissonance in people's minds about what really happened. If people want to continue to reject reality, well, they're idiots.

I was the "party of 1" back in 2002 as well when I argued against the War in Iraq. I've exposed most of the "evidence" people have presented against my arguments, but most are either too lazy to actually watch/read what I posted or just not intelligent enough to understand it. Paul1 and Tdub are the only two on here who have some intellectual honesty in questioning the government's story. I hope they will both continue to be curious and research. Sadly though, most of the others on here fall into the lemming category, including you. Given that you're a male feminist, it isn't surprising to me.

japhy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:41 pm

chiknbut wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:48 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 7:02 pm People said the same thing when I told them the weapons of mass destruction were a lie. Some of us can see through the b.s. better than others.

Lobs, there were a lot of people on this board alone, who doubted the Weapons of Mass Destruction thing. I would guess at least 35 percent of the country doubted the WMDs. You might even remember when Colin Powell floundered while addressing the UN to the point that even fewer people were convinced of the WMDs.

This wasn't anything you were privy to. You were not out on a limb. Sorry.

You are a male feminist; boom, completely and unsurprisingly rebutted.

DrPepper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 9:40 pm YouTube is never going to be another good source for this topic.

Feral wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:51 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:55 pm

chiknbut wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:09 pm

Lobs, you're a Party of 1. Everyone else is making fun of you and, yes, exposing your arguments. Nothing you have posted has not been shut down by several people on this board. Hell, Japhy is fucking eating your breakfast, lunch, dinner and late-night snack.

You're like the guy at the poker table who can't figure out who the sucker is.

The numbers of people who agree have nothing to do with whether something is valid. Lots of people believed in Hitler too. I knew this would be an uphill battle, but I at the very least, have created some cognitive dissonance in people's minds about what really happened. If people want to continue to reject reality, well, they're idiots.

I was the "party of 1" back in 2002 as well when I argued against the War in Iraq. I've exposed most of the "evidence" people have presented against my arguments, but most are either too lazy to actually watch/read what I posted or just not intelligent enough to understand it. Paul1 and Tdub are the only two on here who have some intellectual honesty in questioning the government's story. I hope they will both continue to be curious and research. Sadly though, most of the others on here fall into the lemming category, including you. Given that you're a male feminist, it isn't surprising to me.

I was the "party of 1" back in 2002 as well when I argued against the War in Iraq.

What a crock of total shit. You actually believe that? smh

You've already dressed yourself in a clown suit, don't make it worse by repeating that baseless claim over and over again.

lobster wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 11:33 pm It's antidotal, but I remember it like it was yesterday.

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:06 am The chances of tower 7 falling the way it did from fire are in the millions. The chances of all three buildings falling the way they did from fire is in the billions. That disproves your claims. No one likes to admit they were wrong, especially if they are an "expert" in their field, I get it.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:36 am

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:06 am The chances of tower 7 falling the way it did from fire are in the millions. The chances of all three buildings falling the way they did from fire is in the billions. That disproves your claims. No one likes to admit they were wrong, especially if they are an "expert" in their field, I get it.

JFC

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:06 am The chances of tower 7 falling the way it did from fire are in the millions. The chances of all three buildings falling the way they did from fire is in the billions. That disproves your claims. No one likes to admit they were wrong, especially if they are an "expert" in their field, I get it.

lobster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:06 am The chances of tower 7 falling the way it did from fire are in the millions. The chances of all three buildings falling the way they did from fire is in the billions. That disproves your claims. No one likes to admit they were wrong, especially if they are an "expert" in their field, I get it.

japhy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 8:41 pm

chiknbut wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2019 7:48 pm

lobster wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 7:02 pm People said the same thing when I told them the weapons of mass destruction were a lie. Some of us can see through the b.s. better than others.

Lobs, there were a lot of people on this board alone, who doubted the Weapons of Mass Destruction thing. I would guess at least 35 percent of the country doubted the WMDs. You might even remember when Colin Powell floundered while addressing the UN to the point that even fewer people were convinced of the WMDs.

This wasn't anything you were privy to. You were not out on a limb. Sorry.

You are a male feminist; boom, completely and unsurprisingly rebutted.