Page 12 of 111

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:43 am
by jfish26
Sparko wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:29 am I like that Trump also makes a dim appeal to Alan in hopes he is not cooperating yet.

And Disney's lawyers are pros in Florida. Gadzooks.
There's a non-zero chance these relatively insignificant (in comparison to other known exposures) New York charges end up leading to much more serious procedural (obstruction; witness tampering) crimes.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:14 am
by KUTradition
randylahey wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:16 am
KUTradition wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:07 am all these “lawyers” were lining up to back the stolen election, yet none can be found that are willing to charge the clintons/bidens?
Ever heard of epstein? Or the 60ish other mysterious deaths of people connected to the clintons
and?

conspiracies are great…they require zero actual objective facts

seriously, get a grip. you seem to be as gullible, if not more so, than lobs is/was

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:15 am
by randylahey
We live in a world where today's conspiracies are tomorrow's facts

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:16 am
by randylahey
Anytime something is an inconvenient fact, just gaslight people, censor people, and dismiss it at "conspiracy"

#1 play in the playbook these days

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:17 am
by defixione
Where's the meat?

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:22 am
by DCHawk1
japhy wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 8:45 am
This too will pass.
You're not paying attention.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:25 am
by DCHawk1
randylahey wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:16 am
KUTradition wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:07 am all these “lawyers” were lining up to back the stolen election, yet none can be found that are willing to charge the clintons/bidens?
Ever heard of epstein? Or the 60ish other mysterious deaths of people connected to the clintons
That's it.

I'm calling bullshit.

Wisky? Noosh?

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:26 am
by Shirley
jfish26 wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:43 am
Sparko wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:29 am I like that Trump also makes a dim appeal to Alan in hopes he is not cooperating yet.

And Disney's lawyers are pros in Florida. Gadzooks.
There's a non-zero chance these relatively insignificant (in comparison to other known exposures) New York charges end up leading to much more serious procedural (obstruction; witness tampering) crimes.
Exactly! And as we learned in Watergate, it wasn't the break-in, but Nixon's obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress that led to the articles of impeachment.

As Sparko alluded to, even if it's too late for Trump to attempt to prevent Weinstein from flipping, attacking the judge "for leaning on Allen" let's Trump prepare the soil for continuing to claim and fund raise on the never exhausted well of "victimhood" his cult falls for, if Allen does.

And, right on cue, Trump confirms what every talking head predicted yesterday after the indictment, that despite his lawyers pleading with him not to, Trump is already begging for a gag order of some kind, like the one slapped on Roger Stone after he distributed a picture of his judge's face with a target next to it.

And, for the record, as glad as I am that Trump might finally be held accountable for his actions in this or another trial, my sadness that America was subjected to this man who possesses absolutely no character or sense of responsibility, is only exceeded by the fear I feel if he is allowed to go unpunished.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:26 am
by KUTradition
randylahey wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:16 am Anytime something is an inconvenient fact, just gaslight people, censor people, and dismiss it at "conspiracy"

#1 play in the playbook these days
still no evidence, or explanation for why the clintons and bidens are still walking the streets despite all their “obvious” criminality?

how long ago did all these murders happen?

seems like we’ve been hearing about hunter’s laptop as long as we’ve been hearing about Stormy

it’s cool though…just double down. it’s quite comical

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:31 am
by jfish26
Feral wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:26 am
jfish26 wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:43 am
Sparko wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:29 am I like that Trump also makes a dim appeal to Alan in hopes he is not cooperating yet.

And Disney's lawyers are pros in Florida. Gadzooks.
There's a non-zero chance these relatively insignificant (in comparison to other known exposures) New York charges end up leading to much more serious procedural (obstruction; witness tampering) crimes.
Exactly! And as we learned in Watergate, it wasn't the break-in, but Nixon's obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress that led to the articles of impeachment.

As Sparko alluded to, even if it's too late for Trump to attempt to prevent Weinstein from flipping, attacking the judge "for leaning on Allen" let's Trump prepare the soil for continuing to claim and fund raise on the never exhausted well of "victimhood" his cult falls for, if Allen does.

And, right on cue, Trump confirms what every talking head predicted yesterday after the indictment, that despite his lawyers pleading with him not to, Trump is already begging for a gag order of some kind, like the one slapped on Roger Stone after he distributed a picture of his judge's face with a target next to it.

And, for the record, as glad as I am that Trump might finally be held accountable for his actions in this or another trial, my sadness that America was subjected to this man who possesses absolutely no character or sense of responsibility, is only exceeded by the fear I feel if he is allowed to go unpunished.
And what’s hilarious is that, in begging for that gag order, he’s begging to give away the biggest advantage he’s got: the bully pulpit.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:34 am
by DCHawk1
defixione wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:17 am Where's the meat?
There's plenty of meat. Mostly, it's ham.

For sandwiches.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:38 am
by Shirley
jfish26 wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:31 am
Feral wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:26 am
jfish26 wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:43 am

There's a non-zero chance these relatively insignificant (in comparison to other known exposures) New York charges end up leading to much more serious procedural (obstruction; witness tampering) crimes.
Exactly! And as we learned in Watergate, it wasn't the break-in, but Nixon's obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress that led to the articles of impeachment.

As Sparko alluded to, even if it's too late for Trump to attempt to prevent Weinstein from flipping, attacking the judge "for leaning on Allen" let's Trump prepare the soil for continuing to claim and fund raise on the never exhausted well of "victimhood" his cult falls for, if Allen does.

And, right on cue, Trump confirms what every talking head predicted yesterday after the indictment, that despite his lawyers pleading with him not to, Trump is already begging for a gag order of some kind, like the one slapped on Roger Stone after he distributed a picture of his judge's face with a target next to it.

And, for the record, as glad as I am that Trump might finally be held accountable for his actions in this or another trial, my sadness that America was subjected to this man who possesses absolutely no character or sense of responsibility, is only exceeded by the fear I feel if he is allowed to go unpunished.
And what’s hilarious is that, in begging for that gag order, he’s begging to give away the biggest advantage he’s got: the bully pulpit.
Exactly, and how is he going to keep fleecing his sheep and inflaming the resistance, if he can't go on the media and "catapult" the propaganda?

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:42 am
by ousdahl
I wonder how much Randy has already donated

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:44 am
by randylahey
So epstein managed to find the means to kill himself inside a high security holding cell?

And its just coincidence that it happened when it did, despite him never being suicidal previously in his life?

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:48 am
by Shirley
randylahey wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:16 am
KUTradition wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 10:07 am all these “lawyers” were lining up to back the stolen election, yet none can be found that are willing to charge the clintons/bidens?
Ever heard of epstein? Or the 60ish other mysterious deaths of people connected to the clintons
Republicans controlled both houses of congress and could conduct any investigations, (see BENGHAZI!), they desired, from 2015-2019. And from 2017-2019, Trump was in the Whitehouse, and for 4 years Trump had a very sympathetic Attorney General.

So, as Trad repeatedly ask you, where is the evidence to back up your accusations, and where are the charges? Republicans demonized Hillary for over 2 decades because they were so afraid of her, accused her of everything under the sun including but not limited to drinking children's blood and having a huge child sex ring, yet you have

NOTHING.

Nothing.

You're pitiful.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:51 am
by jfish26

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:53 am
by jfish26

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:57 am
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 9:56 am I also vote third party. Ive said repeatedly i dont want Trump as our next president. Years of propaganda have turned him into a divisive and toxic subject, whether fair or not

But the same people who have been trying to take Trump down for years, have also been trying to bury and suppress evidence of criminal activity within their own party

Thats not how a legal system should work
He was divisive and toxic long before he threw his hat into the political arena.

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:58 am
by KUTradition
jfish26 wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:53 am
Image

Re: Charges

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:59 am
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:44 am So epstein managed to find the means to kill himself inside a high security holding cell?

And its just coincidence that it happened when it did, despite him never being suicidal previously in his life?
To my knowledge, Epstein had never previous been in jail facing life behind bars, either. Kinda changes a man's proclivity towards suicide.