Re: Chiefs 2021
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:01 pm
It was second down. They weren't done trying to move the ball closer. I am betting they felt confident at the time that they could gain 3 yards on two running plays and get a new set of downs to continue to move the ball.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:52 am49 is within his range, but that's by no means close enough to give up on trying to get closer, especially when a miss means you lose. Not when you've literally got the best quarterback ever to get you closer or to the end zone.pdub wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:25 am1:20 and 2nd and 3 from the 32.
That's a what, 49 yard field goal which is in Butker's range.
A run of even no gain might force Balty to use their last timeout - and you still have 3rd and 3 to figure out what to do. A run of 3 yards gets you a first down, complete control of the last moments, and comfortably in Butker's range.
IDK, just as a football fan, this makes it sound like a dumb decision. You want to move the ball down the field and the first down, so you decide to have Mahomes turn around and hand the ball off 2x in a row to a back that's not a goal line back?twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:04 pmIt was second down. They weren't done trying to move the ball closer. I am betting they felt confident at the time that they could gain 3 yards on two running plays and get a new set of downs to continue to move the ball.jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:52 am49 is within his range, but that's by no means close enough to give up on trying to get closer, especially when a miss means you lose. Not when you've literally got the best quarterback ever to get you closer or to the end zone.pdub wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:25 am
1:20 and 2nd and 3 from the 32.
That's a what, 49 yard field goal which is in Butker's range.
A run of even no gain might force Balty to use their last timeout - and you still have 3rd and 3 to figure out what to do. A run of 3 yards gets you a first down, complete control of the last moments, and comfortably in Butker's range.
I think you can live with either decision and conventional is easy to defend.NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:17 pm Much like prevent defense prevents you from winning the game, conservative offense will lose you more games than win.
Reid went conservative.
100% false.NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:17 pm Much like prevent defense prevents you from winning the game, conservative offense will lose you more games than win.
Reid went conservative.
100% agreed. CEH is on some people's shit list because he hasn't been what they hoped he would be so it's way easier to chalk it up as a dumb decision to trust him. Imagine if Hardman had fumbled, an angry mob may have run him out of town. But coaches aren't so irrational.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:19 pmI think you can live with either decision and conventional is easy to defend.NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 1:17 pm Much like prevent defense prevents you from winning the game, conservative offense will lose you more games than win.
Reid went conservative.
But, the taste in the fans' mouth after a CEH fumble is a lot worse than if Mahomes threw 2 incomplete passes and allowed BAL to have a last drive.
i kind of agree, and maybe my description doesn’t necessarily fitpdub wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:03 pm But Reid was playing to win.
A run on 2nd and 3 is "conservative" but really not all THAT "conservative" given the down, time on the clock, timeouts Baltimore had and accuracy of your field goal kicker from 40-49 yards.
You want to get Baltimore to burn the timeout and then you can manage the clock down to four seconds and kick a field goal to win - putting the game completely out of Baltimore's hands.
Yes.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:10 pmi kind of agree, and maybe my description doesn’t necessarily fitpdub wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:03 pm But Reid was playing to win.
A run on 2nd and 3 is "conservative" but really not all THAT "conservative" given the down, time on the clock, timeouts Baltimore had and accuracy of your field goal kicker from 40-49 yards.
You want to get Baltimore to burn the timeout and then you can manage the clock down to four seconds and kick a field goal to win - putting the game completely out of Baltimore's hands.
it was the conservative play, and usually works...it just didn’t this time so monday morning QBs are having a field day
Agreed. There were a few other questionable calls that didnt go our way as well. Like I said, a lot of things all had to go wrong for us to lose this game by one point on the road to a likely playoff team with a former MVP at QB. Those calling for heads are just venting.
personally, i like the idea of taking a shot at the end zone versus maaaaybe 3 more yards on the groundpdub wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:12 pmYes.TraditionKU wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:10 pmi kind of agree, and maybe my description doesn’t necessarily fitpdub wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 3:03 pm But Reid was playing to win.
A run on 2nd and 3 is "conservative" but really not all THAT "conservative" given the down, time on the clock, timeouts Baltimore had and accuracy of your field goal kicker from 40-49 yards.
You want to get Baltimore to burn the timeout and then you can manage the clock down to four seconds and kick a field goal to win - putting the game completely out of Baltimore's hands.
it was the conservative play, and usually works...it just didn’t this time so monday morning QBs are having a field day
I see why they want the ball in Mahomes hands if the game is in jeopardy but already had been -- and then it quickly wasn't.
He had marched them down to field goal range and now you want to control the clock/game to your advantage. A run was a good call. The running back needs to protect it in that situation more than worrying about breaking tackles/getting a first down.