Page 12 of 19
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:05 am
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:30 pm
Jfish is the dumbass. He begged me in a separate thread to look at his post about Fabian marta. And his info wasn't even accurate. Lol. Dumbass
The link he shared simply said that he was a funder, which is accurate. If you drew some sort of meaning out of it that it was implying that he was the primary funder or a major funder then that's on you for once again failing at reading comprehension. You should stop trying to read into things and just take the words for what they say because your ability to read between the lines and find some deeper inferred meaning is terrible.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:55 pm
by randylahey
It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:38 pm
by defixione
twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:05 am
randylahey wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:30 pm
Jfish is the dumbass. He begged me in a separate thread to look at his post about Fabian marta. And his info wasn't even accurate. Lol. Dumbass
The link he shared simply said that he was a funder, which is accurate. If you drew some sort of meaning out of it that it was implying that he was the primary funder or a major funder then that's on you for once again failing at reading comprehension. You should stop trying to read into things and just take the words for what they say because your ability to read between the lines and find some deeper inferred meaning is terrible.
Felony kidnapping is no big deal to them.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 3:29 pm
by twocoach
randylahey wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:55 pm
It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news
A felony kidnapping case, whether related to child custody or not, is not a non story if you care about children like you claim.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2023 5:34 pm
by Sparko
But they don't care. See Trump's family "separation"
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:26 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
Thanks fish and 2coach! I was thinking similar thoughts and admit I was sort of baiting randy.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.
Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:08 am
by twocoach
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:26 am
Thanks fish and 2coach! I was thinking similar thoughts and admit I was sort of baiting randy.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.
Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
We're in this weird social media cycle where pointing anything out is "making a big deal of it" or "being in your head". A Chiefs fan posts something that mentions the Bengals and Bengals fans spazz out about it being proof that the Bengals are all Chiefs fans think about. Someone rightly points out that a person who was a funder of a movie was arrested for a charge and it's "someone making a huge deal of it trying to sabotage the movie". People are so in their social media echo chambers of arguing and ignorance that everything is taken to the nth degree without hesitation. It's exhausting to be honest.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 10:02 am
by KUTradition
shocked that our resident child safety advocate hasn’t posted the recent news of the trafficking bust and children being rescued
shocked, i tell you
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 10:07 am
by defixione
Good news rarely draws any attention.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 11:43 am
by twocoach
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 10:02 am
shocked that our resident child safety advocate hasn’t posted the recent news of the trafficking bust and children being rescued
shocked, i tell you
Yep, just another case of "Biden's" FBI that doesn't do anything about child sex trafficking doing something about child sex trafficking.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/08/australi ... index.html
Our local Omaha FBI field office played a major part in one of these busts last year. Thank goodness they actually care about busting sex traffickers unlike Randy's version of them.
https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-of ... -operation
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 11:45 am
by twocoach
Another recent case here in Omaha, this one the sentencing of a former Omaha police officer who was arrested for production and possession of child pornography to 36 years in federal prison.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-ne/pr/form ... sion-child
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 11:46 am
by jfish26
But see there’s this movie.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:10 pm
by randylahey
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pm
by jfish26
Good!
(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:26 pm
by defixione
Why is the deep state working in Australia instead of the USA?
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:38 pm
by randylahey
jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pm
Good!
(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
These are issues you created. My whole point was that it's bad. You're the one trying to argue semantics about a movie that highlights a bad issue
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:40 pm
by jfish26
randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:38 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pm
Good!
(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
These are issues you created. My whole point was that it's bad. You're the one trying to argue semantics about a movie that highlights a bad issue
I created nothing. The very first time this stupid movie was mentioned on this board was you complaining about liberals taking a skeptical eye toward the movie.
In fact, the ONLY reason this thread exists is you (later) tried to move the goalposts.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:00 pm
by Shirley
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
by twocoach
Yes, that is the case I linked the story to above and that others were referencing.
No one here is doubting that there are various child pedophilia rings operating all over the world. There are no people here or anywhere else claiming otherwise. Good grief. It's the next phase of "logic" that jumps to the conspiracy theory level of stupidity.
Re: Child sex trafficking
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:45 pm
by jfish26
twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Yes, that is the case I linked the story to above and that others were referencing.
No one here is doubting that there are various child pedophilia rings operating all over the world. There are no people here or anywhere else claiming otherwise. Good grief. It's the next phase of "logic" that jumps to the conspiracy theory level of stupidity.
More specifically, using the stupid movie as a form of loyalty test; if you DON'T support this stupid movie, that makes you PRO CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING.