Kansas Crimson

ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:15 pm

TDub wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:05 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:04 pm

You know how you could really benefit student athletes?!

All of them? Or just a few?

well when you out it that way, I couldn’t give two shits whether anyone associated with mizzou receives anything of benefit ever again.

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:52 pm

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:46 pm NIL helps the non-revenue athletes, too. There are many female student athletes that should be able to profit off of their large social media following (even though that can be icky, they should still be able to get compensated for it).

My concern isn't students making other sources of income. (Particularly in ways unrelated to their sport, I think the Greg Anthony type of examples make the NCAA look extremely dumb). I have a problem with the notion that it shouldn't or can't be restricted. I think, at the very least, that the universities should not be involved in setting up deals for players...and they will immediately.

I've said it before, but I think all you have to do is restrict endorsement deals to Sophomores and above and you avoid most of the problems that would come with using it as a recruiting tool, but no one seemed to agree with me.

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:17 pm

PhDhawk wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:52 pm

CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:46 pm NIL helps the non-revenue athletes, too. There are many female student athletes that should be able to profit off of their large social media following (even though that can be icky, they should still be able to get compensated for it).

My concern isn't students making other sources of income. (Particularly in ways unrelated to their sport, I think the Greg Anthony type of examples make the NCAA look extremely dumb). I have a problem with the notion that it shouldn't or can't be restricted. I think, at the very least, that the universities should not be involved in setting up deals for players...and they will immediately.

I've said it before, but I think all you have to do is restrict endorsement deals to Sophomores and above and you avoid most of the problems that would come with using it as a recruiting tool, but no one seemed to agree with me.

The Supreme Court is stating that the NCAA doesn't really have the right to restrict the earnings of the athletes so why would it be OK to only do it to freshmen? If they don't have the right to restrict their earning potential then then they shouldn't be allowed to restrict freshmen.

In a major step, the NCAA Division I Council voted Monday to support an interim policy that would allow college athletes to profit off their name, image and likeness (NIL) without violating NCAA rules until federal legislation or new NCAA rules are adopted.

The Division I Board of Directors will meet Wednesday to review and vote on the recommendation.
In states that have passed NIL-related laws -- Alabama, Florida and Georgia, among others -- athletes would be able to participate in NIL activities that are "consistent with the laws."
For states without NIL laws, athletes will be able to freely engage in NIL activities, making money off signing autographs, or endorsement deals, but schools and conferences in those states, "may choose to adopt their own policies."

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:34 pm So, uh...I declare victory?

NCAA takes big step toward allowing athletes to profit from name, image or likeness

https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/28/us/ncaa- ... index.html

In a major step, the NCAA Division I Council voted Monday to support an interim policy that would allow college athletes to profit off their name, image and likeness (NIL) without violating NCAA rules until federal legislation or new NCAA rules are adopted.

The Division I Board of Directors will meet Wednesday to review and vote on the recommendation.
In states that have passed NIL-related laws -- Alabama, Florida and Georgia, among others -- athletes would be able to participate in NIL activities that are "consistent with the laws."
For states without NIL laws, athletes will be able to freely engage in NIL activities, making money off signing autographs, or endorsement deals, but schools and conferences in those states, "may choose to adopt their own policies."

It's sort of weird how when you, like, build a condo tower on swampland, you're surprised when it falls down.

Wait, I'm mixing my "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" examples-in-the-news.

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:43 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:34 pm So, uh...I declare victory?

NCAA takes big step toward allowing athletes to profit from name, image or likeness

https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/28/us/ncaa- ... index.html

In a major step, the NCAA Division I Council voted Monday to support an interim policy that would allow college athletes to profit off their name, image and likeness (NIL) without violating NCAA rules until federal legislation or new NCAA rules are adopted.

The Division I Board of Directors will meet Wednesday to review and vote on the recommendation.
In states that have passed NIL-related laws -- Alabama, Florida and Georgia, among others -- athletes would be able to participate in NIL activities that are "consistent with the laws."
For states without NIL laws, athletes will be able to freely engage in NIL activities, making money off signing autographs, or endorsement deals, but schools and conferences in those states, "may choose to adopt their own policies."

It's sort of weird how when you, like, build a condo tower on swampland, you're surprised when it falls down.

Wait, I'm mixing my "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" examples-in-the-news.

How long did it take the ncaa to transition from "this is too complicated to be able to do" to "here's our policy", about a week?

Pretty incredible what getting your ass handed to you by the Supreme Court can make possible.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:45 pm Pretty incredible that it took the Supreme Court either way

TDub wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 1:13 pm If KT takes the spear.....so be it

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 1:27 pm

TDub wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 1:13 pm If KT takes the spear.....so be it

^^^^^

he was sloppy

NDballer13 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 1:41 pm Could also word it that the player only played after the NCAA, itself, cleared him to do so.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 1:40 pm was the player re-held out when the NCAA notified KU specifically, or just when a federal trial of all things dug up dirt that the NCAA’s own clearinghouse didn’t?