Re: who ya got?
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 8:25 am
Miss that guy. At least he was funny.
Miss that guy. At least he was funny.
Reagan -- who was considered by many to be waaaaaay too old -- was 73 at the time of his second inauguration.Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:46 am Serious question/s time.
Does anybody care that Joe and Bernie are NOT physically and/or mentally well?
One man is a 78 year old who is running for President and had a heart attack within that last 6 months and the other one is clearly having cognitive issues.
People are actually ok with either of these men being President for 4 or more years?
I'm not.
Name recognition is everything, and the old guys have it. Another problem with Democracy.DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:16 amReagan -- who was considered by many to be waaaaaay too old -- was 73 at the time of his second inauguration.Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:46 am Serious question/s time.
Does anybody care that Joe and Bernie are NOT physically and/or mentally well?
One man is a 78 year old who is running for President and had a heart attack within that last 6 months and the other one is clearly having cognitive issues.
People are actually ok with either of these men being President for 4 or more years?
I'm not.
ALL of the major candidates left will be older than that on Jan. 20, 2021. And at least two of them show signs of cognitive decline far worse than the eventual Alzheimer's patient did.
Not being a polished public speaker isnt the same as "clearly having cognitive issues".Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:46 am Serious question/s time.
Does anybody care that Joe and Bernie are NOT physically and/or mentally well?
One man is a 78 year old who is running for President and had a heart attack within that last 6 months and the other one is clearly having cognitive issues.
People are actually ok with either of these men being President for 4 or more years?
I'm not.
I know, right? His name is Joe Biden, and he's running for the United States Senate. Look him over and if you like what you see, you've looked him over and you'll see what you see!
I'm someone who understands and is sympathetic that people who have had issues with stuttering also have a difficult time communicating their thoughts.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:07 pmNot being a polished public speaker isnt the same as "clearly having cognitive issues".Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:46 am Serious question/s time.
Does anybody care that Joe and Bernie are NOT physically and/or mentally well?
One man is a 78 year old who is running for President and had a heart attack within that last 6 months and the other one is clearly having cognitive issues.
People are actually ok with either of these men being President for 4 or more years?
I'm not.
I know that the University of Google is an excellent medical school and all but maybe we can all hold off on assuming that we can tell what's going on with people based solely on watching them on tv.
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:16 amReagan -- who was considered by many to be waaaaaay too old -- was 73 at the time of his second inauguration.Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:46 am Serious question/s time.
Does anybody care that Joe and Bernie are NOT physically and/or mentally well?
One man is a 78 year old who is running for President and had a heart attack within that last 6 months and the other one is clearly having cognitive issues.
People are actually ok with either of these men being President for 4 or more years?
I'm not.
ALL of the major candidates left will be older than that on Jan. 20, 2021. And at least two of them show signs of cognitive decline far worse than the eventual Alzheimer's patient did.
Clearly not at an airport.
Probably because people like you make assumptions like you're making.Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:27 pmI'm someone who understands and is sympathetic that people who have had issues with stuttering also have a difficult time communicating their thoughts.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 1:07 pmNot being a polished public speaker isnt the same as "clearly having cognitive issues".Grandma wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:46 am Serious question/s time.
Does anybody care that Joe and Bernie are NOT physically and/or mentally well?
One man is a 78 year old who is running for President and had a heart attack within that last 6 months and the other one is clearly having cognitive issues.
People are actually ok with either of these men being President for 4 or more years?
I'm not.
I know that the University of Google is an excellent medical school and all but maybe we can all hold off on assuming that we can tell what's going on with people based solely on watching them on tv.
Still, not being a polished public speaker doesn't really excuse forgetting what day of the week Super Tuesday falls on, what office you're running for, etc., etc., etc.
Let me ask you this. Why do you feel Biden's advisers have cut down on his public speaking engagements?
Would you say it's more about them feeling his not being a polished public speaker may hurt him or because his "senior moments" are legitimately frightening?
Good grief. Come on.DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 3:03 pm You know that he's going to choose a running mate who couldn't get enough votes to stay in the race, right?
Voters rejected Harris, Buttigieg, Gillibrand, Warren, Klobuchar, Booker, etc.
And so, by your logic, they should nevertheless be given the golden ticket.
Cuz democracy?
I'm not sure what that means.twocoach wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 3:27 pmGood grief. Come on.DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 11, 2020 3:03 pm You know that he's going to choose a running mate who couldn't get enough votes to stay in the race, right?
Voters rejected Harris, Buttigieg, Gillibrand, Warren, Klobuchar, Booker, etc.
And so, by your logic, they should nevertheless be given the golden ticket.
Cuz democracy?