Page 120 of 530
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:45 pm
by DCHawk1
ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:43 am
I saw a headline that the 500 richest people saw a collective increase in wealth of $1.2 trillion this year.
The equities markets have generated $17 TRILLION in new "wealth," just since Trump was elected. And it's ALL bullshit money, created intentionally and purposefully by central bank "goosing."
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:27 pm
by Mjl
DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:45 pm
ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:43 am
I saw a headline that the 500 richest people saw a collective increase in wealth of $1.2 trillion this year.
The equities markets have generated $17 TRILLION in new "wealth," just since Trump was elected. And it's ALL bullshit money, created intentionally and purposefully by central bank "goosing."
^^^
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:57 pm
by Geezer
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 6:53 am
by Shirley
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:03 am
by ousdahl
...and isn’t that all after Trump still hasn’t released like billions in disaster relief that congress authorized for Puerto Rico years ago?
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:12 am
by Deleted User 295
Trump tweets too much. Trump doesn't tweet enough.
You know, it's possible he's monitoring the situation and/or communicating with Puerto Rican leaders without tweeting about it, right?.....not that I'm saying he's done that, but who gives a fuck if he's "tweeted" about it or not? That would make zero difference in helping the victims of that disaster.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:16 am
by ousdahl
how often does Trump not tweet about something?
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:24 am
by Deleted User 295
ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:16 am
how often does Trump not tweet about something?
Who. Fucking. Cares.
I think we'd all be better off if he didn't tweet about every thing that pops into his mind.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:25 am
by Deleted User 295
My guess is the people truly impacted by that disaster are not checking twitter frequently monitoring trumps tweets. Aren't those the people you're worried about? They should be....but something tells me you're not too worried about it as much as you are wanting to feel self righteous for fighting the good fight by complaining trump isn't tweeting enough about it. Lulz.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:27 am
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:12 am
Trump tweets too much. Trump doesn't tweet enough.
You know, it's possible he's monitoring the situation and/or communicating with Puerto Rican leaders without tweeting about it, right?.....not that I'm saying he's done that, but who gives a fuck if he's "tweeted" about it or not? That would make zero difference in helping the victims of that disaster.
False. Communication from the President that he is aware of the situation and communicating that he is doing something about it goes a long way to helping the folks affected know that they arent just on their own to figure out how to recover.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:31 am
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:25 am
My guess is the people truly impacted by that disaster are not checking twitter frequently monitoring trumps tweets. Aren't those the people you're worried about? They should be....but something tells me you're not too worried about it as much as you are wanting to feel self righteous for fighting the good fight by complaining trump isn't tweeting enough about it. Lulz.
No matter what anyone says, you are going to default to this assumption. That's a you problem that doesnt actually reflect reality.
You hear "it's just nice to know we arent forgotten" from victims of natural disasters after virtually every touchpoints by a President. It seems to help them so why not do it? Because this President doesnt seem to give a shit about helping them. At least that's the optic based on his previous comments and behaviors.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:33 am
by Deleted User 295
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:27 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:12 am
Trump tweets too much. Trump doesn't tweet enough.
You know, it's possible he's monitoring the situation and/or communicating with Puerto Rican leaders without tweeting about it, right?.....not that I'm saying he's done that, but who gives a fuck if he's "tweeted" about it or not? That would make zero difference in helping the victims of that disaster.
False. Communication from the President that he is aware of the situation and communicating that he is doing something about it goes a long way to helping the folks affected know that they arent just on their own to figure out how to recover.
Is twitter the only way he can do that? No.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:34 am
by Deleted User 295
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:31 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:25 am
My guess is the people truly impacted by that disaster are not checking twitter frequently monitoring trumps tweets. Aren't those the people you're worried about? They should be....but something tells me you're not too worried about it as much as you are wanting to feel self righteous for fighting the good fight by complaining trump isn't tweeting enough about it. Lulz.
No matter what anyone says, you are going to default to this assumption. That's a you problem that doesnt actually reflect reality.
You hear "it's just nice to know we arent forgotten" from victims of natural disasters after virtually every touchpoints by a President. It seems to help them so why not do it? Because this President doesnt seem to give a shit about helping them. At least that's the optic based on his previous comments and behaviors.
Is twitter the only way to do that? No.
You just made back to back posts saying the exact same thing btw....so identical responses felt fitting.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 9:14 am
by twocoach
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:33 am
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:27 am
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:12 am
Trump tweets too much. Trump doesn't tweet enough.
You know, it's possible he's monitoring the situation and/or communicating with Puerto Rican leaders without tweeting about it, right?.....not that I'm saying he's done that, but who gives a fuck if he's "tweeted" about it or not? That would make zero difference in helping the victims of that disaster.
False. Communication from the President that he is aware of the situation and communicating that he is doing something about it goes a long way to helping the folks affected know that they arent just on their own to figure out how to recover.
Is twitter the only way he can do that? No.
No one is made because he didnt specifically use twitter to communicate this. Jesus Christ. The point is that he didnt communicate this at all. Twitter is mentioned purely because he seems to have found enough time to utilize twitter to communicate a zillion other thoughts since then.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 9:17 am
by Deleted User 295
LOL
This discussion started with a tweet about trump NOT tweeting about PR.... so yes, apparently someone is mad he hasn't tweeted.
It's like you don't even ready the posts leading up to the posts you respond to.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 9:25 am
by twocoach
You're getting your panties in a wad about the wrong portion of the complaint. As per usual, another reading comprehension failure.
Go ask the person who posted that if a public statement in any form would be acceptable.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:00 am
by Deleted User 295
twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 9:25 am
You're getting your panties in a wad about the wrong portion of the complaint. As per usual, another reading comprehension failure.
Go ask the person who posted that if a public statement in any form would be acceptable.
I don't wear panties, typically....and I'm also questioning your reading comprehension. As per usual.... funny how that works.
But, yes, I do agree that trump should show support (both verbally and with resources/help) to PR after this latest disaster. So, while we tend to argue circles around the point, I think we have common ground on that issue.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:06 pm
by Deleted User 62
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:17 pm
by DCHawk1
lulz
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2020 5:09 pm
by Geezer
I'm sure that the daily press briefing will deal with P.R.