NBA Finals

Kansas Basketball.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19165
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by twocoach »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:02 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:24 am
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:52 pm Kerr's last play call was a dud.

Right player, wrong shot. Wrong situation to run that play.
He got the the only real shooter left on the team an open, in rhythm three.
Was not open, nor in rhythm and there were 7 seconds still left on the clock.

That play is for a desperation shot when down 3 points with 3 seconds left on the clock.
He runs into threes like that all the time. He was not deep. There was no hand up directly contesting his shot. I'd guess he shoots well over 40% on shots in that range with that level on defense. For Curry, that was open. He took easily a dozen shots yesterday that were more contested. The pass worried me but that's about as good a shot as you could hope for without praying that the defense totally blows an assignment.

And getting a shot up with 7 seconds left gives a chance at a rebound, put back or kick out for another three against a scrambling defense. That seems like the smarter choice than dribbling the clock down, allowing a good Toronto defense to converge on him and ensuring you only get one shot.
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: NBA Finals

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:36 am But for real how often does a team just literally fall apart physically like the dubs did?
Maybe a bit different but the 2015 Cavs were without Love and Irving in the playoffs. LeBron carried that team to 6 games with the Warriors.

Irving fractured his kneecap and Love dislocated a shoulder in the first round.

That freaking team had Lebron, Tristan Thompson, Mozgov, Shumpert, Dellavedova and JR Smith as the 6 guys who got major minutes. And damn James Jones who just tagged along with LeBron was getting 10 minutes a game.

A healthy Cavs team beats those Warriors. And a healthy Warriors team beats this Raptors team. Sucks, but part of the game.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19165
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by twocoach »

Funny to hear all the Warriors fans breaking out the injury excuse.


"Injuries aren't an excuse" after Love and Irving were injured for Cleveland. Same after Leonard was I hired in the WCF. Same after Paul was injured in the WCF.

Now? "We would have won if not for all those injuries".
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: NBA Finals

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:02 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 7:24 am
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:52 pm Kerr's last play call was a dud.

Right player, wrong shot. Wrong situation to run that play.
He got the the only real shooter left on the team an open, in rhythm three.
Was not open, nor in rhythm and there were 7 seconds still left on the clock.

That play is for a desperation shot when down 3 points with 3 seconds left on the clock.
For Curry, he was absolutely open. He was in rhythm because he'd done those multiple times. And I think with it being a win or go home, you have to shoot early in the clock to get a chance at an offensive rebound and putback.

The best player got an open (for him) shot and it just didn't go in and they didn't get the rebound. But I think it was absolutely the right idea.

I'm not the biggest fan of Kerr. I think he struggles with the game management aspect of coaching. He is great in the locker room and getting guys confidence up, but he struggles with TO and end of game situations, but I think he did as well as he could there. Everyone knew where the ball was going, and he still got it to him with a good look.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

The 3 ball has turned you all nutty. That’s a 30% shot for Steph. You only need 1 point.

A good shot is so much better than a bad shot and a chance at a rebound.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33873
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by pdub »

"The only thing is, if Steph (you know, GOAT shooter) hits that shot, then game 7 is forced, and we could just as easily be here right now calling Kerr a genius"

Sure.
But % wise I think there were better plays than that one.
Also, the Warriors woulda lost in Toronto anyways without Durant and Klay.
User avatar
holidaysmore
Posts: 3186
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 11:18 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by holidaysmore »

I will say in that scenario I want my best player with the ball in his hands and the ability to take the shot. If Curry gets the ball the Raptors were going to immediately double team. At that stage who else was going to take that shot if Curry was forced to pass. Only person I would remotely trust would be Iggy.

Agreed. The Warriors would have had a less than .1% chance to win the 6 without KD and Klay.
Holidaysmore - 2005
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19165
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by twocoach »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:46 am The 3 ball has turned you all nutty. That’s a 30% shot for Steph. You only need 1 point.

A good shot is so much better than a bad shot and a chance at a rebound.
In an article posted on ESPN in January, it was reported that since the 2014-2015 season, Steph Curry was 45-94 (47.9%) on shots between 30-35 feet. The NBA 3pt line is only at 23'9". Let that sink in.

To call that a 30% shot is flat out dishonest.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33873
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by pdub »

He also was 0-8 in go-ahead shots in the last 20 seconds.
And was 1-5 in his last six.
It wasn't the worst of calls - and I get why you have the ball in Curry's hands there, he can absolutely make that shot and on paper he's by far your best option - but I think a 3 when you need 1 isn't the best of plans.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29437
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by ousdahl »

twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:29 am Funny to hear all the Warriors fans breaking out the injury excuse.


"Injuries aren't an excuse" after Love and Irving were injured for Cleveland. Same after Leonard was I hired in the WCF. Same after Paul was injured in the WCF.

Now? "We would have won if not for all those injuries".
I wouldn’t exactly call myself a warriors fan, and not trying to offer excuses, just observations.

Yeah (two notoriously injury prone players in) Love and Irving went down through the course of the playoffs.

But have injuries of the Durant-Thompson magnitude ever happened quite like this? When does a contender loose two of their best players in back-to-back deciding games of the finals?
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33873
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by pdub »

I think a healthy Love and Irving makes that series a toss up, maybe even slightly in the Cavs favor.
A healthy KD and Klay there's not much contest - it's over in 5.
A healthy Klay for the 4th quarter and the Warriors force a game 7, no doubt.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19165
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by twocoach »

ousdahl wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:20 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:29 am Funny to hear all the Warriors fans breaking out the injury excuse.


"Injuries aren't an excuse" after Love and Irving were injured for Cleveland. Same after Leonard was I hired in the WCF. Same after Paul was injured in the WCF.

Now? "We would have won if not for all those injuries".
I wouldn’t exactly call myself a warriors fan, and not trying to offer excuses, just observations.

Yeah (two notoriously injury prone players in) Love and Irving went down through the course of the playoffs.

But have injuries of the Durant-Thompson magnitude ever happened quite like this? When does a contender loose two of their best players in back-to-back deciding games of the finals?
Well, considering that teams rarely ever even have players of that magnitude all on the same team, it will be hard to find comparable situations.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19165
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by twocoach »

pdub wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:22 am I think a healthy Love and Irving makes that series a toss up, maybe even slightly in the Cavs favor.
A healthy KD and Klay there's not much contest - it's over in 5.
A healthy Klay for the 4th quarter and the Warriors force a game 7, no doubt.
No doubt, maybe.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33873
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by pdub »

No doubt, definitely.
I'm right.
JayhawkInIowa726
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: NBA Finals

Post by JayhawkInIowa726 »

pdub wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:20 am He also was 0-8 in go-ahead shots in the last 20 seconds.
And was 1-5 in his last six.
It wasn't the worst of calls - and I get why you have the ball in Curry's hands there, he can absolutely make that shot and on paper he's by far your best option - but I think a 3 when you need 1 isn't the best of plans.
Seriously though, what's with everyone settling for threes in tied or go-ahead situations in the NBA. Game 5 was another example.... they never seem to try and get downhill for a layup / foul when you only need a point. Settling for threes (often off the dribble and guarded) seems like a terrible choice. LeBron, Harden, Steph, Dame, Russ.... all of them do it far too often).

No one seems to want to win at the line or with a layup in the last few years.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:15 am
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:46 am The 3 ball has turned you all nutty. That’s a 30% shot for Steph. You only need 1 point.

A good shot is so much better than a bad shot and a chance at a rebound.
In an article posted on ESPN in January, it was reported that since the 2014-2015 season, Steph Curry was 45-94 (47.9%) on shots between 30-35 feet. The NBA 3pt line is only at 23'9". Let that sink in.

To call that a 30% shot is flat out dishonest.
Wait, do we think shot percentage is only about distance?

Done with this.
Deleted User 89

Re: NBA Finals

Post by Deleted User 89 »

congrats to the raptors, despite it taking an achilles and ACL injury
JayhawkInIowa726
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: NBA Finals

Post by JayhawkInIowa726 »

No one mentions the K-Love and Irving injuries when they talk about the Golden State dynasty that's won 3 of 4... Raptors are the Champs.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

JayhawkInIowa726 wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:53 am
pdub wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:20 am He also was 0-8 in go-ahead shots in the last 20 seconds.
And was 1-5 in his last six.
It wasn't the worst of calls - and I get why you have the ball in Curry's hands there, he can absolutely make that shot and on paper he's by far your best option - but I think a 3 when you need 1 isn't the best of plans.
Seriously though, what's with everyone settling for threes in tied or go-ahead situations in the NBA. Game 5 was another example.... they never seem to try and get downhill for a layup / foul when you only need a point. Settling for threes (often off the dribble and guarded) seems like a terrible choice. LeBron, Harden, Steph, Dame, Russ.... all of them do it far too often).

No one seems to want to win at the line or with a layup in the last few years.
It’s a lot to do with the demise of the big man. It’s too easy to crowd the 3 point line with tall guys. That’s why Steph is 0-8 in last 20 seconds of finals games.

We would not run those plays at KU in a different game with very different personnel.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29437
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: NBA Finals

Post by ousdahl »

twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:26 am
ousdahl wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 9:20 am
twocoach wrote: Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:29 am Funny to hear all the Warriors fans breaking out the injury excuse.


"Injuries aren't an excuse" after Love and Irving were injured for Cleveland. Same after Leonard was I hired in the WCF. Same after Paul was injured in the WCF.

Now? "We would have won if not for all those injuries".
I wouldn’t exactly call myself a warriors fan, and not trying to offer excuses, just observations.

Yeah (two notoriously injury prone players in) Love and Irving went down through the course of the playoffs.

But have injuries of the Durant-Thompson magnitude ever happened quite like this? When does a contender loose two of their best players in back-to-back deciding games of the finals?
Well, considering that teams rarely ever even have players of that magnitude all on the same team, it will be hard to find comparable situations.
Seriously?

When was the last time an NBA champion didn’t have multiple all stars on the roster?

I mean we already saw what happened with no Love and Kyrie.

What if the Spurs lost Duncan and Ginobili in games 5 and 6?

Or if the Celts lost KG and Pierce?

Or the Mavs lost Dirk and...and...um...uhh...well we all know Dirk had teammates that year, but who can remember them at this point? The only one I recall is that little 5’2” Hispanic dude who successfully defended Lebron in the post lol
Post Reply