Page 13 of 17
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:18 pm
by Sparko
I have no desire to research or quote your rants Gutter. Context matters
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:19 pm
by Shirley
DrPepper wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 3:49 pm
I see mention of rewarding and penalizing the offenses and defenses for their good efforts and risk taking. What is the rationale for rewarding a pressured QB, out of the pocket, with only a loss of down when the QB throws the ball out the back of the endzone or to (essentially) no one to avoid a sack? TFL and sacks are my favorite plays. Damn near impossible to get a sack when there is all that space across the line of scrimmage (and several rows up into the stands) to throw it.
^^^
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:49 pm
by KUTradition
Shirley wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:19 pm
DrPepper wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 3:49 pm
I see mention of rewarding and penalizing the offenses and defenses for their good efforts and risk taking. What is the rationale for rewarding a pressured QB, out of the pocket, with only a loss of down when the QB throws the ball out the back of the endzone or to (essentially) no one to avoid a sack? TFL and sacks are my favorite plays. Damn near impossible to get a sack when there is all that space across the line of scrimmage (and several rows up into the stands) to throw it.
^^^
the rationale is that the qb has the awareness and wherewithal to get rid of the ball rather than take a sack or toss an interception…and it has to be outside of the tackle box
even pro qb’s end up taking a bunch of sacs even though they could’ve just thrown it away
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:55 pm
by Back2Lawrence
Sparko wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 11:25 am
I'll take the under. Although bitching about bitching may not be as virtuous as you both seem to think
Sir, you are no longer alone I this category.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:59 pm
by Back2Lawrence
And for the record I’m not bitching about bitching. I have said it’s tiresome. And LOL in many instances.
That tackle looked like a face mask or something with his head moving weird? Or I saw it wrong rage typing
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:30 pm
by pdub
Bullshit.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:31 pm
by pdub
Not a hold…took away a TD.
Refs.
Vegas called.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:35 pm
by DeletedUser
pdub wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 3:31 pm
Vegas called.
If this is a thing, all my sites showed the vast majority of the money on Baltimore. So in theory, vegas is for KC.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:22 pm
by pdub
Holding call missed on that deep Flowers play.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:28 pm
by DeletedUser
Big call coming up...
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:28 pm
by DeletedUser
I knew there was a reason I loved this rule!
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:43 pm
by pdub
Missed holds EVERYWHERE
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:01 pm
by KUTradition
pdub wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 4:43 pm
Missed holds EVERYWHERE
even my wife was calling them out
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:03 pm
by pdub
Please.
Thank you.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:08 pm
by pdub
MVS REDEMPTION TOUR
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:48 pm
by Sparko
So nice to see the flags did not determine the game today. Poised.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 5:53 pm
by pdub
They got away with at least three massive holds on big gains.
We got away with likely DPI on the INT in the endzone.
That “hold” to take back Rices TD was weak as hell.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:30 pm
by Back2Lawrence
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:31 pm
by twocoach
Losers whine about the refs.
Re: Refs
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2024 6:51 pm
by Sparko
Ravens did nothing on the ground. Spags defeated their identity and Reid sat on the lead