2023-2024 lineup

Kansas Basketball.
User avatar
InfiniteJ
Contributor
Posts: 2138
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:46 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by InfiniteJ »

Grimes left and the following year KU was the best team in college basketball.
User avatar
randylahey
Posts: 8970
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by randylahey »

MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:28 pm recruiting has suffered because of the never ending investigation.
We had 3 mcdonalds all americans this season. And another highly touted 4 star. And Kevin mccullar.. one of the best transfer available. I think recruiting is fine
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:22 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:11 pm Self hated the bench. It's pretty clear. Not great roster construction from him for the 22-23 season. But it's tough with the portal.

Need shooters. Isiah Moss types.
GM Bill has had a pretty rough run over the last, what, 5-7 years.
I thought the same, but 2022 cured a lot. But it hasn't been the prettiest.

GM Bill is rough. Coach Bill is top notch.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

randylahey wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:49 pm
MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:28 pm recruiting has suffered because of the never ending investigation.
We had 3 mcdonalds all americans this season. And another highly touted 4 star. And Kevin mccullar.. one of the best transfer available. I think recruiting is fine
Hamburger AAs when they don't fit is 10x worse than regular recruits who fit very well together. See 2022. 1 Hamburger AA, McCormack. Ochai, Braun, Dajuan, Jalen and more were just regular recruits. Nothing special.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by Mjl »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:22 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:11 pm Self hated the bench. It's pretty clear. Not great roster construction from him for the 22-23 season. But it's tough with the portal.

Need shooters. Isiah Moss types.
GM Bill has had a pretty rough run over the last, what, 5-7 years.
No. Name a coach who has been a better GM.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

KUTradition wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:13 pm
twocoach wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:59 pm
Mjl wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:57 pmYesufu gone now
Up to 2 spots open now. Going to be all in on the transfer market now. A shooter and a big.
is the big just an assumption?

i’d think a couple prototypical combo guards that can shoot a bit (and aren’t midgets) would be the targets…a guy that can play on ball or off, coupled with a bigger “wing”
Pretty sure this describes our incoming freshmen
User avatar
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 3145
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by Back2Lawrence »

ousdahl wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 7:02 pm Udeh
KJ
MJ
Elmarko
Dajuan

or something. We'll be in the transfer game too. And, why not, maybe some unexpected return/s.

and dunno if we keep any of Bobby/Yes/Zach/Cam/Cuffe
Fyp
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 13878
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by KUTradition »

ousdahl wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:18 pm
KUTradition wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:13 pm
twocoach wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 1:59 pm

Up to 2 spots open now. Going to be all in on the transfer market now. A shooter and a big.
is the big just an assumption?

i’d think a couple prototypical combo guards that can shoot a bit (and aren’t midgets) would be the targets…a guy that can play on ball or off, coupled with a bigger “wing”
Pretty sure this describes our incoming freshmen
i actually had that same thought

but, they’re very obviously unproven
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18657
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by jfish26 »

Mjl wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:16 pm
jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:22 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:11 pm Self hated the bench. It's pretty clear. Not great roster construction from him for the 22-23 season. But it's tough with the portal.

Need shooters. Isiah Moss types.
GM Bill has had a pretty rough run over the last, what, 5-7 years.
No. Name a coach who has been a better GM.
I love Bill, but: lots of them, frankly?

18-19 - Arguably the worst team of Bill's era (101 minutes (!) per game for Vick/Grimes/Garrett/Moore)

19-20 - (sigh)

20-21 - Not good, 83 minutes per game for Garrett/Thompson/Harris/Enaruna/Grant-Foster

21-22 - Not good until Remy caught a heater

22-23 - Bench gave us nearly nothing

To be clear: maybe, with all of that, we have still been the best team over that span. It's possible!

But that's Coach Bill, not GM Bill. These have NOT been very good rosters.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 29999
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by ousdahl »

All that GM Self criticism coincidentally coincides with the F the NCAA thread
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18657
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by jfish26 »

The biggest problem is we consistently have guys playing one role above what you'd like to see. Garrett and Harris are the easy examples.

You want guys like that on your team, but you want them playing 16-24 minutes or something. Not being linchpins.

For example, from his sophomore through senior years, Russell Robinson (who was much better than Garrett or Harris) averaged about 8/4.5/3/2/0.5 in about 28 minutes. On the best teams he was on, he averaged five FGA/game.

THAT's what you want out of guys like him. You DON'T want Harris averaging 34 minutes and 7.7 FGA like he did this year. Or - ugh - Garrett averaging 33 minutes and 8.8 FGA like he did in 20-21.
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by Mjl »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:44 pm
Mjl wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 3:16 pm
jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:22 pm

GM Bill has had a pretty rough run over the last, what, 5-7 years.
No. Name a coach who has been a better GM.
I love Bill, but: lots of them, frankly?

18-19 - Arguably the worst team of Bill's era (101 minutes (!) per game for Vick/Grimes/Garrett/Moore)

19-20 - (sigh)

20-21 - Not good, 83 minutes per game for Garrett/Thompson/Harris/Enaruna/Grant-Foster

21-22 - Not good until Remy caught a heater

22-23 - Bench gave us nearly nothing

To be clear: maybe, with all of that, we have still been the best team over that span. It's possible!

But that's Coach Bill, not GM Bill. These have NOT been very good rosters.
He's getting a nice blend of talent and experience. He's never used his bench much. Some players didn't work out as expected - just like with every team and coach.
User avatar
Mjl
Posts: 6272
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:24 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by Mjl »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:03 pm The biggest problem is we consistently have guys playing one role above what you'd like to see. Garrett and Harris are the easy examples.

You want guys like that on your team, but you want them playing 16-24 minutes or something. Not being linchpins.

For example, from his sophomore through senior years, Russell Robinson (who was much better than Garrett or Harris) averaged about 8/4.5/3/2/0.5 in about 28 minutes. On the best teams he was on, he averaged five FGA/game.

THAT's what you want out of guys like him. You DON'T want Harris averaging 34 minutes and 7.7 FGA like he did this year. Or - ugh - Garrett averaging 33 minutes and 8.8 FGA like he did in 20-21.
RussRob was not much better than Garrett or Harris.
Not even "better".
I'd say not even equal.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18657
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by jfish26 »

Mjl wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:05 pm
jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:03 pm The biggest problem is we consistently have guys playing one role above what you'd like to see. Garrett and Harris are the easy examples.

You want guys like that on your team, but you want them playing 16-24 minutes or something. Not being linchpins.

For example, from his sophomore through senior years, Russell Robinson (who was much better than Garrett or Harris) averaged about 8/4.5/3/2/0.5 in about 28 minutes. On the best teams he was on, he averaged five FGA/game.

THAT's what you want out of guys like him. You DON'T want Harris averaging 34 minutes and 7.7 FGA like he did this year. Or - ugh - Garrett averaging 33 minutes and 8.8 FGA like he did in 20-21.
RussRob was not much better than Garrett or Harris.
Not even "better".
I'd say not even equal.
Russell left a lot on the table, individually. I personally think he would have done better than Garrett and Harris did, in the too-big roles they ended up in.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 20955
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by twocoach »

MICHHAWK wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 2:16 pm the best part is that we no longer have to be tortured by the "joe vs bobby" blather.
We will always be tortured by the (player a) vs. (player b) blather. The players change every year but the torture always continues.
User avatar
randylahey
Posts: 8970
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by randylahey »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:29 pm
Mjl wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:05 pm
jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 23, 2023 4:03 pm The biggest problem is we consistently have guys playing one role above what you'd like to see. Garrett and Harris are the easy examples.

You want guys like that on your team, but you want them playing 16-24 minutes or something. Not being linchpins.

For example, from his sophomore through senior years, Russell Robinson (who was much better than Garrett or Harris) averaged about 8/4.5/3/2/0.5 in about 28 minutes. On the best teams he was on, he averaged five FGA/game.

THAT's what you want out of guys like him. You DON'T want Harris averaging 34 minutes and 7.7 FGA like he did this year. Or - ugh - Garrett averaging 33 minutes and 8.8 FGA like he did in 20-21.
RussRob was not much better than Garrett or Harris.
Not even "better".
I'd say not even equal.
Russell left a lot on the table, individually. I personally think he would have done better than Garrett and Harris did, in the too-big roles they ended up in.
Russ is so underrated. I agree with you man. Russ played on a stacked team, so the individual numbers were never there. But he was rock solid
User avatar
AlOerter
Contributor
Posts: 3211
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:02 pm

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by AlOerter »

Russell was one of my all time favorite PG's at KU.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35806
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by pdub »

21-22 not good until Remy caught a heater isn’t correct.

We were 6th in Kenpom going into the NCAA tourney. I don’t consider his B12 tournament very heater.

Two guys went first round NBA draft.
One was a 1st team AA.
That’s pretty good.

We finished 3rd in Kenpom.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 35806
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by pdub »

Also Russ Rob wasn’t much better than Dajuan.

Gtfo with this RussRob legend business.
Did RussRob ever win B12 DPOY?

Harris in his junior year had more PPG, more APG, more SPG at a better FG percentage than senior RussRob.

And I’d argue RussRobs FG percentages and assists were bolstered because of the stacked squad around him. Easier to get buckets next to Rush, Chalmers and Shady.
User avatar
AlOerter
Contributor
Posts: 3211
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 9:02 pm

Re: 2023-2024 lineup

Post by AlOerter »

Back on the thread title, I'd like to see us have at least 3 good (not average) 3 point shooters. Watching the tournament it seems like teams that advance (haven't actually checked the numbers) have more than one good 3 point shooter. The game is going that way and this year's team just wasn't consistent from 3.
Post Reply