Kansas Crimson

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Just embrace the rudeness around here. It'll make it easier to enjoy. Most of the libs take it easy on you since you participate in the echo chamber, so it's not that bad for you.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:48 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Just embrace the rudeness around here. It'll make it easier to enjoy. Most of the libs take it easy on you since you participate in the echo chamber, so it's not that bad for you.

There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:07 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:48 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Just embrace the rudeness around here. It'll make it easier to enjoy. Most of the libs take it easy on you since you participate in the echo chamber, so it's not that bad for you.

There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.

There should be 2 or 3 at minimum.

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:58 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:56 pm Nah. Condescending ass hat is par for the course. You can't be condescending in nearly 75% of your posts and not expect the same to be returned your way.

My advice is don't argue outside your tier. Stick to arguing with dummies from "hicksville" like me and you won't get made to look foolish like DC just did to your post by literally dissecting it down to its' true roots.

Holy Fuck, do you actually read what you advise?

Also, does DC have grab handles installed on his hips...you know, for your safety?

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:09 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:07 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:48 pm

There isnt a single person on this board that I am less likely to take advice from than you.

There should be 2 or 3 at minimum.

Haha, I am sure one of them would be you, right?

japhy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:57 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:47 pm

japhy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:19 pm

Wrong?

He's infallible!

So of course he was right to insult and belittle the military leaders. It's how you motivate people, he showed us all how that works on his TV show for years. And him telling them they would all go bankrupt if they ran a business.....who better to explain fiscal responsibility to the generals than a super successful TV personality businessman like tiny.

I tell you DC, your ability to stifle your gag reflex as you suckle is most impressive. You have a future as professional toadie, my tax cuts are safe in your soft nimbly servicing hands.

So...wut yer sayin' is you luv war?

Cuz that's wut I'm hearin'.

I'm hearing pure emotive gibberish.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:49 pm

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:01 pm

TDub wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:23 am

Im saying that racism and/or dislike of Obama are not the reasons Trump killed Soleimani. It would be outright silly to believe those were the driving factors.

you don’t think trump wanted his own “bin laden”?

He's broken so many of you.

chiknbut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:40 pm

chiknbut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.

i’m sending mine back...i think it’s broken

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:49 pm But at the core of it, there isnt even a definition of what "winning" is. How do you win nothing?

japhy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:57 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 2:47 pm

japhy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:19 pm

Wrong?

He's infallible!

So of course he was right to insult and belittle the military leaders. It's how you motivate people, he showed us all how that works on his TV show for years. And him telling them they would all go bankrupt if they ran a business.....who better to explain fiscal responsibility to the generals than a super successful TV personality businessman like tiny.

I tell you DC, your ability to stifle your gag reflex as you suckle is most impressive. You have a future as professional toadie, my tax cuts are safe in your soft nimbly servicing hands.

So...wut yer sayin' is you luv war?

Cuz that's wut I'm hearin'.

I'm hearing pure emotive gibberish.

chiknbut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:11 pm "nah" is a reply used to signify that you have fallen into the habit, so common here, of inventing explanations to fit your predispositions. There's no evidence whatsoever in the cited passage about Trump opposing Afghanistan for "purely transactional" reasons, much less that he insulted anyone other than those in the room with him. Moreover, these comments, which you interpret as purely ignorant and self-serving (but which are likely neither), wouldn't have been heard or even known by "those serving there bravely" if someone else hadn't leaked them.

Your entire response is pure emotive gibberish. There are plenty of reasons to think that Afghanistan has been an enormous failure, and yet you ignore all of them...cUZ TRUMp! That's...well...nah.

So "nah" isn't the same as "lulz?"

I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.

japhy wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 6:45 pm

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 5:40 pm

chiknbut wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:22 pm I got my DC decoder ring in the mail a few days ago and, I have to admit, it's kinda confusing.

i’m sending mine back...i think it’s broken

Most everything associated with principled conservatism is these days, swallowing the trump juice as a form of tribute affects their brains. But they got their judges and I get my tax breaks, so as long as they can live with their self degradation, who am I to complain.

Keep swallowing trumpublicans, I wanna retire early.

Feral wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:42 pm Tree camo in space because


forests: