Kansas Crimson

This is fine.

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:53 pm Biden is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t

Yet another reason for him to just go away.

DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:20 pm This is fine.

I assume he meant the 91 bill

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:41 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:53 pm Biden is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t

Yet another reason for him to just go away.

same could be said about you

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:50 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:41 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 2:53 pm Biden is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t

Yet another reason for him to just go away.

same could be said about you

So predictable.

you must be a mind reader

maybe you should change professions; i hear Miss Cleo got paid

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 8:06 pm you must be a mind reader

maybe you should change professions; i hear Miss Cleo got paid

No, you’re just not nearly as clever as you imagine yourself to be.

you’re the one doing the talking

Non sequitur?

KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 9:11 pm you’re the one doing the talking

Ha! Made my night. But you can't ever reach the MAGA core. They are in a loop of delusion.

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 9:41 am

Only rubes believe bad things about Brandon and Hunter.

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 9:41 am

If there’s specific, objective evidence, make good with it. But “the National Archives […] has 5,400 Biden emails in which the president potentially […]” has a hole you could drive a truck through.

As always, if there is specific, objective evidence of wrongdoing, make good with it, and then we’ll discuss what the evidence specifically, objectively shows.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 9:50 am

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 9:41 am

If there’s specific, objective evidence, make good with it. But “the National Archives […] has 5,400 Biden emails in which the president potentially […]” has a hole you could drive a truck through.

As always, if there is specific, objective evidence of wrongdoing, make good with it, and then we’ll discuss what the evidence specifically, objectively shows.

You won't accept any evidence unless it aligns with your opinions. We've been going down this road for years.

There's evidence of all kinds of shit you refuse to acknowledge

goddamn you’re dumb

And I would say documenting of over 5000 emails biden used fake names is evidence itself. And this isn't new information. The mainstream media is talking about it now, but this was being reported back in 2020 before the election

Another example of something trump was right about that you idiots called "misinformation"

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries. ... ar%20words.

randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:05 am And I would say documenting of over 5000 emails biden used fake names is evidence itself. And this isn't new information. The mainstream media is talking about it now, but this was being reported back in 2020 before the election

Another example of something trump was right about that you idiots called "misinformation"

Are there 5,000 emails where that happened? Or 5,000 emails where that potentially happened?

Because that’s not the same thing!

For example, you have 6,200+ posts in which you potentially demonstrate a rational understanding of the Constitution. However, you do NOT have 6,200+ posts in which you actually demonstrate a rational understanding of the Constitution.

Trump demanded the GOP impeach Biden for stuff they weren't making up fast enough. Voila. I would suspect there will be more fraudulent evidence manufactured. Russia hit on Hunter being a potential weak link and the scumbags have been on it relentlessly

Hey, lets pretend the man with a MOUNTAIN of actual evidence did nothing wrong.

At the same time, lets impeach the guy with "potential" evidence against him!