Kansas Crimson

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:49 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:26 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:12 am

Let's start with "The governor of Texas enforces the laws on the books for hiring illegals, but it doesn't impact the flow of illegals over the Texas border. "

PROVE that this is what happens before you roll that avalanche of assumptions down the mountain behind it. They are not adequately enforcing the laws on the books for hiring illegals. This has been proven over and over and over. You're once again starting with a false assumption as well as working backwards in your logic. Enforce the damn laws.

And if the governors of Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi are to blame for the continued flow of illegals over the border then you just answered your question of "where do you recommend that Abbott send these illegals?" It's as if shipping them to Democrat-run cities is just a political stunt and not a "you're causing the problem, you deal with the results of the problem" action.

That's not what I was trying to say. I meant that the Governor is responsible for enforcement. Obviously he is not doing so, for the reasons that followed. Sorry for the confusion. I'm not a good multitasker.

To your second point, of course it is a publicity stunt. How else to draw attention than to send a bunch of illegals to disrupt the idylls of the elite in Martha's Vineyard? Is anyone going to pay attention if a busload of illegals rolls into Shawnee, OK or Possum Holler, AR? Nope. It's not rocket science.

Maybe his constituents would be better off if he addressed the problem and enforced the laws in his state instead of doing publicity stunts. Maybe he could spend the money spent on those publicity stunts on ramping up enforcement of ALL sides of the immigration issue within his state instead of turning a blind eye to one of the most serious parts of the problem so that he can get tax revenue and campaign contributions from the companies benefitting from undocumented workers in his state.

Do something productive and helpful instead of doing something because it is self-serving.

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 12:00 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:26 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:12 am

Let's start with "The governor of Texas enforces the laws on the books for hiring illegals, but it doesn't impact the flow of illegals over the Texas border. "

PROVE that this is what happens before you roll that avalanche of assumptions down the mountain behind it. They are not adequately enforcing the laws on the books for hiring illegals. This has been proven over and over and over. You're once again starting with a false assumption as well as working backwards in your logic. Enforce the damn laws.

And if the governors of Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi are to blame for the continued flow of illegals over the border then you just answered your question of "where do you recommend that Abbott send these illegals?" It's as if shipping them to Democrat-run cities is just a political stunt and not a "you're causing the problem, you deal with the results of the problem" action.

That's not what I was trying to say. I meant that the Governor is responsible for enforcement. Obviously he is not doing so, for the reasons that followed. Sorry for the confusion. I'm not a good multitasker.

To your second point, of course it is a publicity stunt. How else to draw attention than to send a bunch of illegals to disrupt the idylls of the elite in Martha's Vineyard? Is anyone going to pay attention if a busload of illegals rolls into Shawnee, OK or Possum Holler, AR? Nope. It's not rocket science.

This assumes that what attention is being drawn to, is the actual issue.

I do not think that’s the case.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 12:03 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 12:00 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 11:26 am

That's not what I was trying to say. I meant that the Governor is responsible for enforcement. Obviously he is not doing so, for the reasons that followed. Sorry for the confusion. I'm not a good multitasker.

To your second point, of course it is a publicity stunt. How else to draw attention than to send a bunch of illegals to disrupt the idylls of the elite in Martha's Vineyard? Is anyone going to pay attention if a busload of illegals rolls into Shawnee, OK or Possum Holler, AR? Nope. It's not rocket science.

This assumes that what attention is being drawn to, is the actual issue.

I do not think that’s the case.

What is the actual issue if not the flood of illegals coming across the border?

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 1:58 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 12:03 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 12:00 pm

This assumes that what attention is being drawn to, is the actual issue.

I do not think that’s the case.

What is the actual issue if not the flood of illegals coming across the border?

My point is that none of these publicity stunts are intended to result in any movement on the actual issues.

That’s what makes them publicity stunts.

Which you agree they are.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 2:03 pm

jfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 1:58 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 12:03 pm

What is the actual issue if not the flood of illegals coming across the border?

My point is that none of these publicity stunts are intended to result in any movement on the actual issues.

That’s what makes them publicity stunts.

Which you agree they are.

I guess we disagree on the nature of the actual issue, then, which is fine.

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 3:06 pm easier and more politically expedient than actually doing something of substance

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 3:06 pm easier and more politically expedient than actually doing something of substance

JKLivin wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 5:16 pm

KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 3:06 pm easier and more politically expedient than actually doing something of substance

I would argue that closing the entrance is substantive.

zsn wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 8:40 pm Under the misconception that the likes of randy and psych actually care about facts or principles……..

Here’s an actual true example of something that’s not rare. Wonder what they think or how they address the problem. When my daughter was in elementary school she had a classmate from an Eastern European country. Her dad and mom worked in tech and helped the mom’s brother immigrate. He owned a business which had cleaning contracts for office buildings. He had contracts for numerous buildings.

His business was thriving because of the way he hired and paid workers. He brought friends and family and family of friends from the home country. They entered the country legally on the Schengen tourist visa. They were allowed to remain for six months but not allowed to work. He packed them in an apartment and paid them about third/half of minimum wage. They worked for about five and a half months and returned. They were replaced by a new crew. I think he had three or four teams which rotated. They didn’t raise any flags because they were all white.

“Closing the entrance”……..as DC would say, LulZ!

zsn wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:43 pm I didn’t say that you said it was OK. Just pointing out that “closing the entrance” or Build The Wall or razor wire buoys wouldn’t even be a start to addressing actual problems. And that’s what you’re focusing on. Have any one of you called your Red State/District office holders and asked how they are going to handle the demand side of the equation?

JKLivin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:16 am

zsn wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:43 pm I didn’t say that you said it was OK. Just pointing out that “closing the entrance” or Build The Wall or razor wire buoys wouldn’t even be a start to addressing actual problems. And that’s what you’re focusing on. Have any one of you called your Red State/District office holders and asked how they are going to handle the demand side of the equation?

It’s going to be a situation where the cure is painful at first. All I know is that we can’t keep going like we have been. Living in a Texas border city was a little slice of Hell, but it was also a preview of what is in store for the rest of the country if something isn’t done soon.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2023 7:16 am

zsn wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 9:43 pm I didn’t say that you said it was OK. Just pointing out that “closing the entrance” or Build The Wall or razor wire buoys wouldn’t even be a start to addressing actual problems. And that’s what you’re focusing on. Have any one of you called your Red State/District office holders and asked how they are going to handle the demand side of the equation?

It’s going to be a situation where the cure is painful at first. All I know is that we can’t keep going like we have been. Living in a Texas border city was a little slice of Hell, but it was also a preview of what is in store for the rest of the country if something isn’t done soon.