Misinformation

Ugh.
Overlander
Contributor
Posts: 6354
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm

Re: Misinformation

Post by Overlander »

DeletedUser wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm
BiggDick wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:24 pm
Why do you think going "further left" is so odd?
Because I am yet to see compelling data that supports your conclusion.

It's another one of your "gut feeling" or "eye test" type opinions.
Is this ride due to stop anytime soon?
“whatever that means”
Mich
ads arent a big deal User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 21254
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by twocoach »

BiggDick wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:02 pm in today's edition of, Holy Fuck!

yes, maybe if dems DID coach up some young stars* then they wouldn't have lost to a 78 year old felon!

For real, I'm surprised that take is controversial. What do you think the move is otherwise, to NOT coach up some young stars and prop any old schmuck up there on the chance they'll win the messaging game anyway?








*and also give those stars a chance to shine in an actual primary, rather than doubling down on an even older 81yo candidate until it was too late, only to then have to hastily pinch-hit a never-was-popular veep as candidate instead
It's not controversial. It's just word vomit.
DeletedUser
Posts: 5188
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:35 pm

Re: Misinformation

Post by DeletedUser »

Overlander wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:53 pm
DeletedUser wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm
BiggDick wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:24 pm
Why do you think going "further left" is so odd?
Because I am yet to see compelling data that supports your conclusion.

It's another one of your "gut feeling" or "eye test" type opinions.
Is this ride due to stop anytime soon?
No end in sight.
User avatar
BiggDick
Contributor
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:09 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by BiggDick »

I mean, one way it COULD end is to just like, stop engaging me.

It's pretty silly to prompt a response, then fuss about it if I respond.
User avatar
BiggDick
Contributor
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:09 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by BiggDick »

DeletedUser wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm
BiggDick wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:24 pm
Why do you think going "further left" is so odd?
Because I am yet to see compelling data that supports your conclusion.

It's another one of your "gut feeling" or "eye test" type opinions.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/4708/healt ... ystem.aspx

59% think it's the responsibility of the federal government to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage

78% worry a fair or great deal about the availability and affordability of healthcare

61% somewhat or very dissatisfied with the availability of affordable healthcare

81% are dissatisfied with the total cost of healthcare

69% describe the state of healthcare as either in a state of crisis or having major problems.

71% say the cost of their healthcare has gone up a little to a lot in the last year.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/4708/healt ... ystem.aspx

of course, this is just one source of polls. Lord knows there's plenty of other data out there worth discussing. And this is just on the issue of healthcare, and healthcare costs in particular. An issue which, despite what these polls indicate, was somehow hardly discussed this election BESIDES among the progressive "left."


And there's a few more gems worth discussing even within this source! I just obviously cherry picked a few I thought were most interesting. Some of the polls seem like they can be drawn along partisan lines. At least one specifically stands out as worth discussing in this particular thread. And, gee, I wonder why some of the polls didn't show any data collected since 2020?
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 14077
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by KUTradition »

DeletedUser wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 9:10 pm
Overlander wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:53 pm
DeletedUser wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm

Because I am yet to see compelling data that supports your conclusion.

It's another one of your "gut feeling" or "eye test" type opinions.
Is this ride due to stop anytime soon?
No end in sight.
y’all keep feeding him
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 12642
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

BiggDick wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:18 pm
DeletedUser wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:35 pm
BiggDick wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 8:24 pm
Why do you think going "further left" is so odd?
Because I am yet to see compelling data that supports your conclusion.

It's another one of your "gut feeling" or "eye test" type opinions.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/4708/healt ... ystem.aspx

59% think it's the responsibility of the federal government to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage

78% worry a fair or great deal about the availability and affordability of healthcare

61% somewhat or very dissatisfied with the availability of affordable healthcare

81% are dissatisfied with the total cost of healthcare

69% describe the state of healthcare as either in a state of crisis or having major problems.

71% say the cost of their healthcare has gone up a little to a lot in the last year.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/4708/healt ... ystem.aspx

of course, this is just one source of polls. Lord knows there's plenty of other data out there worth discussing. And this is just on the issue of healthcare, and healthcare costs in particular. An issue which, despite what these polls indicate, was somehow hardly discussed this election BESIDES among the progressive "left."


And there's a few more gems worth discussing even within this source! I just obviously cherry picked a few I thought were most interesting. Some of the polls seem like they can be drawn along partisan lines. At least one specifically stands out as worth discussing in this particular thread. And, gee, I wonder why some of the polls didn't show any data collected since 2020?
Talk to me like I am 6 years old. What does all that have to do with going "further left"?
Gutter wrote: Fri Nov 8th 2:16pm
New President - New Gutter. I am going to pledge my allegiance to Donald J. Trump and for the next 4 years I am going to be an even bigger asshole than I already am.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18840
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by jfish26 »

I think the point is essentially to suggest that "left" positions on health care are broadly popular. And I think the inference we're supposed to draw is that, if "left" positions are outpolling "left" candidates, then "left" candidates should be leaning harder into "left" positions.

Or something like that.

The problem is that this dichotomy is hardly unique to healthcare; go do gun control, for example.

Or, look at states like Missouri, which somehow - schizophrenically - just voted in favor of abortion rights AND an increase in the minimum wage AND and legally-protected paid leave...AND...

...you know where I'm going...

...AND Donald Trump.

Yes, one of the lessons to learn from all this is just how doggone effective Republican gerrymandering and voter suppression efforts have been.

But at least as important a lesson is that, well, cults are powerful. And they're powerful because they overwhelm reason and rationality.

(It is here I will just sigh, deeply, reflecting on the fact that our Constitution provides for a guardrail that seemed tailor-made for the exact situation we found ourselves in...and the hold Trump has on our system is so strong that we just sort of shrugged aside the Constitution.)
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 14077
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by KUTradition »

but, didn’t you hear about Cornell West’s policies?
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
BiggDick
Contributor
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:09 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by BiggDick »

jfish26 wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:56 am I think the point is essentially to suggest that "left" positions on health care are broadly popular. And I think the inference we're supposed to draw is that, if "left" positions are outpolling "left" candidates, then "left" candidates should be leaning harder into "left" positions.

Or something like that.
this isn't a bad take. Folks tend to be further left on many issues than they'd say out loud, depending on how it's phrased and such...and bear in mind, much of "the left" is rooted in the sort of "treat others the way you wanna be treated" sort of basic decency we learn in like kindergarten (then are basically taught to unlearn as we get older)
But at least as important a lesson is that, well, cults are powerful. And they're powerful because they overwhelm reason and rationality.
I'm sitting here wondering if it ever occurs to a cult member that they're even in a cult.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 18840
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by jfish26 »

BiggDick wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2024 9:32 am
jfish26 wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2024 5:56 am I think the point is essentially to suggest that "left" positions on health care are broadly popular. And I think the inference we're supposed to draw is that, if "left" positions are outpolling "left" candidates, then "left" candidates should be leaning harder into "left" positions.

Or something like that.
Folks tend to be further left on many issues than they'd say out loud, depending on how it's phrased and such...
I think you're right on top of a fundamental truth about our politics: for lots and lots of reasons, voters are much more willing to associate themselves with progressive policies than they are with progressiveness.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 16813
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by Shirley »

President Harry Truman began the Democratic Party's effort(s) to provide health care to the American people over three-quarters of a century ago, and he failed. Democratic President LBJ somehow managed to overcome the charges of "socialized medicine" and predictions that "all the physicians will stop practicing medicine", to pass Medicare and Medicaid benefits for the elderly, disabled, and poor, in 1965. Democratic President Obama passed the Affordable Care Act in 2010.

During that same 3/4ers of a century, Republicans did everything they could to stop them. "Everything", multiple times, in multiple ways.

If health care is a panacea for getting Democrats elected, whence* Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, GHWB, GWB, and Trump?

In addition to the previous mention of gun control being a popular leftist policy, the right of a woman to choose is also "leftist" and polls favorably by a large majority.

Considering how those popular leftest policies, including national health care, have nonetheless failed to elect Democrats on a number of occasions going back decades, I think your analysis and recommendation could use some tweaking.


*"whence"

adverb
from what place or source.
"whence do they derive those powers?"

adverb
from which; from where.
"the Ural mountains, whence the ore is procured"
"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Frank Wilhoit
User avatar
zsn
Contributor
Posts: 3825
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: Misinformation

Post by zsn »

Have you read “What’s the Matter with Kansas?” - therein lies the answer. Still relevant 20 years later, if not more so!!
User avatar
BiggDick
Contributor
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:09 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by BiggDick »

I did read that in college, but don't recall much...something about how heartland economic progressivism got hijacked by the conservative culture war issues?
User avatar
zsn
Contributor
Posts: 3825
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 7:39 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Re: Misinformation

Post by zsn »

Pretty much. Basically, rural people will vote against their own interests in order to stick it to the “elitists”.

As far as healthcare goes, we’re the only “civilized”** nation that hasn’t figured this out. But not because we can’t; it’s because there are many people who don’t want it fixed. Similar to immigration.

**not sure how much longer we can use this term to describe the USA
User avatar
BiggDick
Contributor
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:09 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by BiggDick »

Shirley wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2024 10:49 am President Harry Truman began the Democratic Party's effort(s) to provide health care to the American people over three-quarters of a century ago, and he failed. Democratic President LBJ somehow managed to overcome the charges of "socialized medicine" and predictions that "all the physicians will stop practicing medicine", to pass Medicare and Medicaid benefits for the elderly, disabled, and poor, in 1965. Democratic President Obama passed the Affordable Care Act in 2010.

During that same 3/4ers of a century, Republicans did everything they could to stop them. "Everything", multiple times, in multiple ways.

If health care is a panacea for getting Democrats elected, whence* Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, GHWB, GWB, and Trump?

In addition to the previous mention of gun control being a popular leftist policy, the right of a woman to choose is also "leftist" and polls favorably by a large majority.

Considering how those popular leftest policies, including national health care, have nonetheless failed to elect Democrats on a number of occasions going back decades, I think your analysis and recommendation could use some tweaking.


*"whence"

adverb
from what place or source.
"whence do they derive those powers?"

adverb
from which; from where.
"the Ural mountains, whence the ore is procured"
good post!

I enjoy the historical context provided.

I'd like to respond to a couple of your points in particular:

- if health care is a panacea for getting Democrats elected, whence President McCain? Oh wait, that's right, he lost the election to a dood who campaigned on more progressive ideals such as, among other things, universal healthcare.

(contrast that with Kamala's campaign, which was largely just "moving to the middle" AKA largely just rebranding conservative positions but in blue.)


- "Considering how those popular leftest policies, including national health care, have nonetheless failed to elect Democrats on a number of occasions going back decades, I think your analysis and recommendation could use some tweaking."

I'm tempted to expand, but for now, let's just contrast Kamala's campaign with Barack's.

So with that said, I think this one is more like, considering how democrats have failed to leverage any momentum by actually pursuing otherwise-popular "leftist" policies, I think your analysis and recommendation could use some tweaking.
User avatar
BiggDick
Contributor
Posts: 1288
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2024 11:09 am

Re: Misinformation

Post by BiggDick »

zsn wrote: Wed Dec 04, 2024 11:48 am Pretty much. Basically, rural people will vote against their own interests in order to stick it to the “elitists”.

As far as healthcare goes, we’re the only “civilized”** nation that hasn’t figured this out. But not because we can’t; it’s because there are many people who don’t want it fixed. Similar to immigration.

**not sure how much longer we can use this term to describe the USA
yea!

Re: "rural people will vote against their own interests" and the whole culture war thing - I can't find the exact stat. now, but in the early 20th century, some significant portion of U.S. preachers identified as socialist. I think one big thing that since changed, maybe, is the Cold War?

Re: healthcare, yea, it's another one of those "no way to possibly fix this says the only nation where this happens" sorts of Oniony headlines.
Post Reply