Re: Uncle Joe
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 10:15 am
This is fine.
This comes off an snarky but isn't meant to: do you object to investment in improved intra-African rail transportation?
My guess is DC may have ALSO meant to post the rest of what he said. Which of course was indeed a large gaffe.jfish26 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 10:20 amThis comes off an snarky but isn't meant to: do you object to investment in improved intra-African rail transportation?
Because the analysis I've read suggests that - particularly with the involvement of partners that are not viewed on the continent as colonialist - the thinking is that improved infrastructure will serve to lower-case-d democratize the minerals industry, which (as a general matter) reduces corruption and power concentration.
Why don't we try investing in our own country insteadjfish26 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 10:20 amThis comes off an snarky but isn't meant to: do you object to investment in improved intra-African rail transportation?
Because the analysis I've read suggests that - particularly with the involvement of partners that are not viewed on the continent as colonialist - the thinking is that improved infrastructure will serve to lower-case-d democratize the minerals industry, which (as a general matter) reduces corruption and power concentration.
(I have this image of you trying, and always failing, to walk and chew gum at the same time.)randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:54 amWhy don't we try investing in our own country insteadjfish26 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 10:20 amThis comes off an snarky but isn't meant to: do you object to investment in improved intra-African rail transportation?
Because the analysis I've read suggests that - particularly with the involvement of partners that are not viewed on the continent as colonialist - the thinking is that improved infrastructure will serve to lower-case-d democratize the minerals industry, which (as a general matter) reduces corruption and power concentration.
Is this any more, or any less, relevant than the clips of Trump not knowing how stairs or cups work, etc.?randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:04 am You must have a better opinion of me then biden then. He can't even seem to get the walking part down, without tripping. I wouldn't want to know what would happen if he tried to chew gum
Our economy is global so that seems to be a good thing.randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:54 am Biden is a damn globalist. Bought and paid for by globalists
Amazing that the inflation and border hawks would also seem to be in favor of pure economic isolationism...twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:41 amOur economy is global so that seems to be a good thing.randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:54 am Biden is a damn globalist. Bought and paid for by globalists
Yes, because limiting ourselves to the confines of our borders won't have any negative impact on costs...jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:45 amAmazing that the inflation and border hawks would also seem to be in favor of pure economic isolationism...twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:41 amOur economy is global so that seems to be a good thing.randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:54 am Biden is a damn globalist. Bought and paid for by globalists
wut?
Sorry. I wrote a longer response to this, but PDub's hamster was on break or something...so it disappeared into the ether. My understanding is that both current projects are largely Belt and Road financed.jfish26 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 10, 2023 10:20 amThis comes off an snarky but isn't meant to: do you object to investment in improved intra-African rail transportation?
Because the analysis I've read suggests that - particularly with the involvement of partners that are not viewed on the continent as colonialist - the thinking is that improved infrastructure will serve to lower-case-d democratize the minerals industry, which (as a general matter) reduces corruption and power concentration.
One of the issues we have in engineering right now is a lack of qualified/educated job candidates. This is for jobs that average $85k salaries. With 10 plus years of experience, that number can double. The number of Canadien engineering resumes in my email seems to grow all the time.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:41 amOur economy is global so that seems to be a good thing.randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:54 am Biden is a damn globalist. Bought and paid for by globalists
I guess I'm confused - what would you call withdrawing the US from global economic programs and initiatives? And how is that different from isolationism?randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 10:14 am The fuck? When did anyone mention isolation?
All I hinted at was not funding other countries
Whether economics or actual war, the betaboy cultists do not ever seem to understand why someone in the position of strength (being us) would want to fight battles on others' turf.japhy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 10:56 amOne of the issues we have in engineering right now is a lack of qualified/educated job candidates. This is for jobs that average $85k salaries. With 10 plus years of experience, that number can double. The number of Canadien engineering resumes in my email seems to grow all the time.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:41 amOur economy is global so that seems to be a good thing.randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 8:54 am Biden is a damn globalist. Bought and paid for by globalists
The US exports around $250B in professional services a year to the rest of the world.
The two things might be related.
The service fees we collect on services sold outside the US is taxed at a lower rate than services sold in the US. So if one was to document their "time" on a US project and thereby lower the profit while lowering their "time" on lower taxed foreign projects raising those profits, you get to keep more of the collective profits. One thing engineers are good at is figuring out how to work formulas and spreadsheets.
If building wealth in the US is "globalist", fucking count me in bitches!
If the betaboy cultists can't compete in a worldwide economy, maybe they could spend less time building muscles for a fantasy competitive gun show and more time building marketable skills that will allow them to compete in economic reality.
Or they can just whine and bitch....don't make me no nevermind what self defeating activities the rubes engage in.
I thought that was an odd premise, too. But his point that "they want you to believe that Joe Biden's age is just as severe as Donald Trump's fascism", was spot on.DCHawk1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 11, 2023 10:06 amwut?
This isn't "both sidesism." It's "one guy is president and the other guy is not." They focused plenty on Trump's issues -- which, I agree, are real and should be disqualifying -- when he was president. And they'll do so again if/when necessary. The truth is that neither man could be trusted to make his own breakfast without burning the house down, and neither should be trusted with anything more consequential either.