Page 15 of 134
Re: Royals
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:23 pm
by jfish26
Cascadia wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:14 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 6:24 am
Cascadia wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2020 10:38 pm
That’s fucking dope. Hope it happens. Don’t really care about fountains and the crown. Fine with them either way
I suspect it's a nearly-foregone conclusion that baseball will be downtown within a decade's time.
The question - that matters a lot! - is exactly
where. I worry some that they'll try to build it with a sort of pre-packaged entertainment area (not unlike Truist/Battery Park in Atlanta), somewhere downtown-adjacent, rather than just sort of drop it in (like Target Field/1st Ave./Warehouse District in Minneapolis).
Totally agree. A downtown stadium can easily be fucked up. If done correctly, they can change the entire dynamics of a city.
Especially a baseball stadium that has
80+ events during the best weather of the year.
Spoken like a true Portlander. One of the things that doesn't get talked about all that much is that Kansas City has, like, bottom quartile weather among mid-size to large US cities. While it doesn't have the extremes of, say, Minneapolis on one hand or Atlanta on the other, it is hot and gross in the summer, and cold and gross in the winter. Spring and fall last a combined 20 days.
Very shitty weather city.
Re: Royals
Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:50 pm
by Cascadia
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:23 pm
Cascadia wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 4:14 pm
jfish26 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2020 6:24 am
I suspect it's a nearly-foregone conclusion that baseball will be downtown within a decade's time.
The question - that matters a lot! - is exactly
where. I worry some that they'll try to build it with a sort of pre-packaged entertainment area (not unlike Truist/Battery Park in Atlanta), somewhere downtown-adjacent, rather than just sort of drop it in (like Target Field/1st Ave./Warehouse District in Minneapolis).
Totally agree. A downtown stadium can easily be fucked up. If done correctly, they can change the entire dynamics of a city.
Especially a baseball stadium that has
80+ events during the best weather of the year.
Spoken like a true Portlander. One of the things that doesn't get talked about all that much is that Kansas City has, like, bottom quartile weather among mid-size to large US cities. While it doesn't have the extremes of, say, Minneapolis on one hand or Atlanta on the other, it is hot and gross in the summer, and cold and gross in the winter. Spring and fall last a combined 20 days.
Very shitty weather city.
That’s why I left!
Re: Royals
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:36 am
by jfish26
I don’t think you can beat LA for weather, particularly when you take the mountains into account. I’ve surfed and snowboarded on the same day!
Re: Royals
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 10:33 am
by Deleted User 141
jfish26 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:36 am
I don’t think you can beat LA for weather, particularly when you take the mountains into account. I’ve surfed and snowboarded on the same day!
Yeah, but what a shitty political climate
Re: Royals
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 1:35 pm
by Cascadia
LA is just too much of a human cesspool for me. The PNW is basically a dream world for me. There really isn’t much that I don’t like.
And it can’t be stated enough. KC is a very shitty weather city. Maybe the worst in the US (w/ St. Louis)
Re: Royals
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 3:03 pm
by jfish26
Cascadia wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 1:35 pm
LA is just too much of a human cesspool for me. The PNW is basically a dream world for me. There really isn’t much that I don’t like.
And it can’t be stated enough. KC is a very shitty weather city. Maybe the worst in the US (w/ St. Louis)
I think like Memphis and Nashville are marginally worse, but yes.
Re: Royals
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 2:21 pm
by Sparko
The tornadoes make it all worthwhile.
; )
Re: Royals
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:04 pm
by Sparko
Royals looking decent this Spring. Good to have Salvy back.
Re: Royals
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2020 4:09 pm
by CrimsonNBlue
Not great, Bob.
Re: Royals
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2020 4:18 pm
by jfish26
Honestly, I don't hate betting on U 29.5 and YES on HR Champ.
If he's healthy enough to hit 30, he's got a decent chance at champ (especially with Judge's injury).
Re: Royals
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 8:27 pm
by Sparko
Was looking forward to baseball.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:55 am
by jfish26
Draft Day!
Who ya got???
I'm good with Zac Veen or Max Meyer (and obviously one of Torkelson, Martin or Lacy, should they fall).
I would lose my shit if they took Nick Gonzales.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 9:40 am
by CrimsonNBlue
I was ecstatic about taking Starling over Lindor, Rendor and Springer. I wanted Appel over Zimmer.
But, I'll take Lacy.
It will be either Veen or Gonzales.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 10:12 am
by jfish26
CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 9:40 am
I was ecstatic about taking Starling over Lindor, Rendor and Springer. I wanted Appel over Zimmer.
But, I'll take Lacy.
It will be either Veen or Gonzales.
I'd personally prefer Meyer, just because if he was 6'3" he'd be a clear 1-1. I think he's Oswalt or Lincecum.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:12 am
by NewtonHawk11
Rany Jazayerli dropped this fun nugget.
The Royals last picked #4 in 2010. The top 3 prospects in that draft? Bryce Harper, Jameson Tailon and Manny Machado. They picked Colon as there was no guaranteed #4.
The Royals pick #4 this year. Top 3 are almost guaranteed to be Torkelson, Martin and Lacy. No clear #4.
Hope this year's #4 ends up much better.
Keith Law has them getting Veen. I'd love Meyer or Veen. Meyer most MLB ready pitcher. Think it'll be Veen. I wish there was a good INF prospect they could get. I know Gonzales can be that, but I think they really like Veen. They seem a bit low on INF in the system.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:34 pm
by jfish26
NewtonHawk11 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 11:12 am
Rany Jazayerli dropped this fun nugget.
The Royals last picked #4 in 2010. The top 3 prospects in that draft? Bryce Harper, Jameson Tailon and Manny Machado. They picked Colon as there was no guaranteed #4.
The Royals pick #4 this year. Top 3 are almost guaranteed to be Torkelson, Martin and Lacy. No clear #4.
Hope this year's #4 ends up much better.
Keith Law has them getting Veen. I'd love Meyer or Veen. Meyer most MLB ready pitcher. Think it'll be Veen. I wish there was a good INF prospect they could get. I know Gonzales can be that, but I think they really like Veen. They seem a bit low on INF in the system.
You can't draft for need like that, though.
Gonzales just feels like Colon all over again.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 1:03 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Yeah that's a good point. It's different than every other sport.
Just go get the best guy.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 6:37 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Lacy! Love that pick. Absolutely love it.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 7:51 pm
by jfish26
I would have preferred Martin. But it’s a good pick.
Re: Royals
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 8:33 pm
by NewtonHawk11
Yeah Martin did slide a bit. And I get it. But Lacy the most college ready pitcher. That 2022 Royals rotation is going to be NAAAASTY